Hobnail Boot
Well-Known Member
I'd pay for their plane tickets to come storm TDO as well if I thought it would help.They wouldn't dare! The locals would storm TDA with pitchforks and torches.
I'd pay for their plane tickets to come storm TDO as well if I thought it would help.They wouldn't dare! The locals would storm TDA with pitchforks and torches.
Ya think?i have a sneaky suspicion that WDW is targeting the 12 and under set to its parks
Ok, so, while I would personally greenlight probably a million things before a big-buck Frozen attraction, if THIS, the BIGGEST HIT the company has seen in DECADES doesn't justify SIGNIFICANT capital expenditure, WHAT FREAKIN' DOES, DISNEY???I agree. Supposedly the most successful animated movie of all time and it's getting the laziest, lamest execution possible for theme park use.
Not that anyone should expect any different. After all, it's Walt Disney World.
I'm all for a Frozen attraction, in MK or HS!!!!! A Frozen attraction taking over Maelstrom is an abomination!!
Why so hostile?
Still trolling? Kevidently so....(Enjoying the posts yet? )
I would still be upset at the thought of a cruddy frozen overlay of maelstrom. Removing mention of an entire country in world showcase is just ignorance though.. I laugh about how out of touch they are but come on, they need to wake the hell up!None of this is a surprise, the proposed Matterhorn overlay is just laughable.
I can't say I'm all that upset about Maelstrom, its no less than I would expect from the decision-makers at TDO these days. Did anyone really expect them to understand and respect the premise and purpose of Epcot?
Can't disagree one but.You watch this isn't the end of it, they will continue to shoehorn more and more cartoon characters in EPCOT to drive attendance and capacity away from MK. Kiddie-fy EPCOT. Just unbelievable. This truly is blasphemes.This isn't what EPCOT was designed to be. Please don't anyone of the usaual suspects come on here and try to spin this. There isn't anyway to spin it. Maelstrom was ( is) extremely popular and now they want to ruin the essence. Just unbelievable!
You watch.....you watch what EPCOT will look like in ten years. It will be MK 2.0....I am telling you. They wont build another gate....they will just transform this one. Go ahead TDO....keep pi$$ing off your base....BRILLIANT!
You mean the imagination pavilion that is only 1/3 in use or the wonder of life that is in use once a year... odyssey just sits there looking silly.. apologists, please speak up. I'm really dying to know why this is ok.Here's the part that really baffles me: according to the article announcing Tom Fitzgerald's new appointment, "Disney is poised to begin a major re-Imagineering of Epcot, looking to restore the original intent of the park in both Future World and World Showcase." Granted, I was a rather young whippersnapper in Epcot's early days, but this is most decidedly not what I remember as the original focus of Epcot. And again I say, "Can we please concentrate on filling the holes instead of fixing what's not broken?"
Norway isn't "Disney."I just don't understand why they have to replace Norway. Why can't they just make this in MK or HS? Is it really THAT much cheaper to replace Norway??? W T F!!!!
I would love to see a Russia Pavilion, and as the 15th century ice slides were the predecessors of modern day coasters, I've always thought they'd make the basis of a perfect E-ticket attraction. This would be a perfect example of "filling a hole".I am just wondering... and while I don't agree with adding Frozen to Norway...If the Russian pavilion had been built, the attraction was to be a sleigh ride through Russian fairy tales...And that sparked no controversy... So if Frozen had been based on an actual Norwegian tale would we feel adding an attraction based on that tale would still be out of place? In general I do not care for standard Disney Princesses invading World Showcase, but if they are integrated in a meaningful way...showcasing culture and heritage, is it still such a bad thing? If in adding Frozen to Maelstrom the ride is lengthened and has a completed storyline....which seamlessly blended with a new film... I don't know... Initially I hated the idea, but the more I think of the possibilities...Maybe it would not be so bad....as long as they use the characters as a window into Norwegian culture...
I know everyone hates the idea of Ratatouille in France, but again, any new attraction in World Showcase that integrates into the theme of the pavilion...and is a window into the culture would not be bad...and truly that film was all about being in the culinary world of Paris...which is appropriate... As long as they do not remove things like Impressions De France to do that... so there is still a full cultural picture of France and it's culture...
The Morocco Pavilion is state funded and Disney loved to discuss King Hassan II's interest in the design of the Pavilion. I do not know if King Mohammed VI is similarly interested but would think the state maintains some continued say in the Morocco Pavilion. My guess is that the argument for including Aladdin would be that the umma, the global community of Muslims, is to come before the nation state. As an Islamic state and culture, Moroccan culture is thus also to a degree pan-Islamic.
And why Norway? What was wrong with Denmark as a source of visual design? Would Finnish styling have hurt the story?
I am just wondering... and while I don't agree with adding Frozen to Norway...If the Russian pavilion had been built, the attraction was to be a sleigh ride through Russian fairy tales...And that sparked no controversy... So if Frozen had been based on an actual Norwegian tale would we feel adding an attraction based on that tale would still be out of place? In general I do not care for standard Disney Princesses invading World Showcase, but if they are integrated in a meaningful way...showcasing culture and heritage, is it still such a bad thing? If in adding Frozen to Maelstrom the ride is lengthened and has a completed storyline....which seamlessly blended with a new film... I don't know... Initially I hated the idea, but the more I think of the possibilities...Maybe it would not be so bad....as long as they use the characters as a window into Norwegian culture...
I know everyone hates the idea of Ratatouille in France, but again, any new attraction in World Showcase that integrates into the theme of the pavilion...and is a window into the culture would not be bad...and truly that film was all about being in the culinary world of Paris...which is appropriate... As long as they do not remove things like Impressions De France to do that... so there is still a full cultural picture of France and it's culture...
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.