Frozen ride replacing Maelstrom?

Status
Not open for further replies.

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
I agree. Supposedly the most successful animated movie of all time and it's getting the laziest, lamest execution possible for theme park use.

Not that anyone should expect any different. After all, it's Walt Disney World.
Ok, so, while I would personally greenlight probably a million things before a big-buck Frozen attraction, if THIS, the BIGGEST HIT the company has seen in DECADES doesn't justify SIGNIFICANT capital expenditure, WHAT FREAKIN' DOES, DISNEY???



*le sigh*
 

Matt_Black

Well-Known Member
I'm all for a Frozen attraction, in MK or HS!!!!! A Frozen attraction taking over Maelstrom is an abomination!!

Which planned attraction would be the stupidhead, then?

Me+with+comebacks_3aa37c_5080739.png
 

FrankLapidus

Well-Known Member
None of this is a surprise, the proposed Matterhorn overlay is just laughable.

I can't say I'm all that upset about Maelstrom, its no less than I would expect from the decision-makers at TDO these days. Did anyone really expect them to understand and respect the premise and purpose of Epcot?
 

bhg469

Well-Known Member
None of this is a surprise, the proposed Matterhorn overlay is just laughable.

I can't say I'm all that upset about Maelstrom, its no less than I would expect from the decision-makers at TDO these days. Did anyone really expect them to understand and respect the premise and purpose of Epcot?
I would still be upset at the thought of a cruddy frozen overlay of maelstrom. Removing mention of an entire country in world showcase is just ignorance though.. I laugh about how out of touch they are but come on, they need to wake the hell up!
 

Hakunamatata

Le Meh
Premium Member
You watch this isn't the end of it, they will continue to shoehorn more and more cartoon characters in EPCOT to drive attendance and capacity away from MK. Kiddie-fy EPCOT. Just unbelievable. This truly is blasphemes.This isn't what EPCOT was designed to be. Please don't anyone of the usaual suspects come on here and try to spin this. There isn't anyway to spin it. Maelstrom was ( is) extremely popular and now they want to ruin the essence. Just unbelievable!

You watch.....you watch what EPCOT will look like in ten years. It will be MK 2.0....I am telling you. They wont build another gate....they will just transform this one. Go ahead TDO....keep pi$$ing off your base....BRILLIANT!
Can't disagree one but.
 

xdan0920

Think for yourselfer
That slippery slope so many were concerned about, seems to be turning into a full on mudslide.

Maybe un-themed napkins/cups/plates, weren't such a big deal in and of themselves.

Maybe turning off rows and rows of popcorn lights on the GF isn't a big deal to many.

Maybe routing guests off stage and off theme at the MK isn't a big deal to folks.

Maybe parking a food truck in the middle of Epcot isn't a big deal.

Maybe some people don't care that there is a Starbucks on Main Street or that there are flying carpets and spitting camels in AdventureLand.

But, now, the WORLD. The real WORLD Showcase, is about to lose a REAL country, in favor of a make believe one.

Brand defenders, please, find a way to justify this........



ps. I am taking @pheneix at his word. He has been a reliable source around here for a long time, couple that with that fact that @WDW1974 also dropped hints on this one, and @Lee isn't saying they are wrong, and we have a pretty good idea that this idea is coming(at the moment, at least).
 

TeriofTerror

Well-Known Member
Here's the part that really baffles me: according to the article announcing Tom Fitzgerald's new appointment, "Disney is poised to begin a major re-Imagineering of Epcot, looking to restore the original intent of the park in both Future World and World Showcase." Granted, I was a rather young whippersnapper in Epcot's early days, but this is most decidedly not what I remember as the original focus of Epcot. And again I say, "Can we please concentrate on filling the holes instead of fixing what's not broken?"
 

docandsix

Active Member
If true, then this decision ranks among the worst TDO has ever made, testifying to both their low standards and their utter inability to honor the design principles which made the parks great in the first place. No longer visionaries, they have become unimaginative tightwads and money-grubbing opportunists.

My family and I are scheduled to visit WDW this summer. After that, I don't anticipate returning for a very long time. I'm even beginning to think of unloading our DVC points.

Where the $#%@* is John Lasseter in all of this? Evidently, he lacks either the power I had hoped he was given or the vision I believed he commanded.
 

bhg469

Well-Known Member
Here's the part that really baffles me: according to the article announcing Tom Fitzgerald's new appointment, "Disney is poised to begin a major re-Imagineering of Epcot, looking to restore the original intent of the park in both Future World and World Showcase." Granted, I was a rather young whippersnapper in Epcot's early days, but this is most decidedly not what I remember as the original focus of Epcot. And again I say, "Can we please concentrate on filling the holes instead of fixing what's not broken?"
You mean the imagination pavilion that is only 1/3 in use or the wonder of life that is in use once a year... odyssey just sits there looking silly.. apologists, please speak up. I'm really dying to know why this is ok.
 

Bocabear

Well-Known Member
I am just wondering... and while I don't agree with adding Frozen to Norway...If the Russian pavilion had been built, the attraction was to be a sleigh ride through Russian fairy tales...And that sparked no controversy... So if Frozen had been based on an actual Norwegian tale would we feel adding an attraction based on that tale would still be out of place? In general I do not care for standard Disney Princesses invading World Showcase, but if they are integrated in a meaningful way...showcasing culture and heritage, is it still such a bad thing? If in adding Frozen to Maelstrom the ride is lengthened and has a completed storyline....which seamlessly blended with a new film... I don't know... Initially I hated the idea, but the more I think of the possibilities...Maybe it would not be so bad....as long as they use the characters as a window into Norwegian culture...
I know everyone hates the idea of Ratatouille in France, but again, any new attraction in World Showcase that integrates into the theme of the pavilion...and is a window into the culture would not be bad...and truly that film was all about being in the culinary world of Paris...which is appropriate... As long as they do not remove things like Impressions De France to do that... so there is still a full cultural picture of France and it's culture...
 

TeriofTerror

Well-Known Member
I am just wondering... and while I don't agree with adding Frozen to Norway...If the Russian pavilion had been built, the attraction was to be a sleigh ride through Russian fairy tales...And that sparked no controversy... So if Frozen had been based on an actual Norwegian tale would we feel adding an attraction based on that tale would still be out of place? In general I do not care for standard Disney Princesses invading World Showcase, but if they are integrated in a meaningful way...showcasing culture and heritage, is it still such a bad thing? If in adding Frozen to Maelstrom the ride is lengthened and has a completed storyline....which seamlessly blended with a new film... I don't know... Initially I hated the idea, but the more I think of the possibilities...Maybe it would not be so bad....as long as they use the characters as a window into Norwegian culture...
I know everyone hates the idea of Ratatouille in France, but again, any new attraction in World Showcase that integrates into the theme of the pavilion...and is a window into the culture would not be bad...and truly that film was all about being in the culinary world of Paris...which is appropriate... As long as they do not remove things like Impressions De France to do that... so there is still a full cultural picture of France and it's culture...
I would love to see a Russia Pavilion, and as the 15th century ice slides were the predecessors of modern day coasters, I've always thought they'd make the basis of a perfect E-ticket attraction. This would be a perfect example of "filling a hole".
 

morningstar

Well-Known Member
The Morocco Pavilion is state funded and Disney loved to discuss King Hassan II's interest in the design of the Pavilion. I do not know if King Mohammed VI is similarly interested but would think the state maintains some continued say in the Morocco Pavilion. My guess is that the argument for including Aladdin would be that the umma, the global community of Muslims, is to come before the nation state. As an Islamic state and culture, Moroccan culture is thus also to a degree pan-Islamic.

I believe the story of Aladdin predates Islam. So it's a story from a land that later became Muslim, and Morocco is different land that also became Muslim. Aladdin in Morocco fits like Hercules would in Germany. Hercules is from Greece. Greece was not then, but is now, a Christian country. Germany is also now a Christian country. So Hercules fits in Germany?

And why Norway? What was wrong with Denmark as a source of visual design? Would Finnish styling have hurt the story?

Because Norway is awesome. They don't have fjords quite like that in the other Scandinavian countries.
 

Nemo14

Well-Known Member
I am just wondering... and while I don't agree with adding Frozen to Norway...If the Russian pavilion had been built, the attraction was to be a sleigh ride through Russian fairy tales...And that sparked no controversy... So if Frozen had been based on an actual Norwegian tale would we feel adding an attraction based on that tale would still be out of place? In general I do not care for standard Disney Princesses invading World Showcase, but if they are integrated in a meaningful way...showcasing culture and heritage, is it still such a bad thing? If in adding Frozen to Maelstrom the ride is lengthened and has a completed storyline....which seamlessly blended with a new film... I don't know... Initially I hated the idea, but the more I think of the possibilities...Maybe it would not be so bad....as long as they use the characters as a window into Norwegian culture...
I know everyone hates the idea of Ratatouille in France, but again, any new attraction in World Showcase that integrates into the theme of the pavilion...and is a window into the culture would not be bad...and truly that film was all about being in the culinary world of Paris...which is appropriate... As long as they do not remove things like Impressions De France to do that... so there is still a full cultural picture of France and it's culture...

I think the biggest objection is that WS is not Fantasyland. Make-believe characters have their place in Magic Kingdom, but WS is about real places and real culture. Children can handle that, and child-like adults can too!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom