s8film40
Well-Known Member
To be fair we're not really talking about night time. This happened around sunset. It's a popular time to take a stroll along a beach. I'm sorry photos do not equal rules. I'm not saying a photo implies it's okay but rather a photo vaguely illustrates the amenities they are choosing to advertise their property with. I personally do a lot of marketing photography for homes and resorts. I choose the time of day for photographing the property based on how I and my clients want the photo to look, I've never shot photos based on rules of the resorts. If the beach is an amenity the client wants to advertise they will ask me to photograph it, if the beach is not accessible to the public this will not be what they want me to focus on. It's a marketing decision plain and simple.Stroll along the beach during the day (like your photo) is not the same thing as strollling along the water or using a sail boat AT NIGHT. That's my point, don't gloss over the important distinctions.
The photo also doesn't show life preservers... are we to assume from those promotional images that they aren't needed when playing on the sailboat? Or how about sailing at night... that cool too from what you see in your photo?
Or maybe we should infer we can bring our own sail boat and park it on the beach!
Nothing about this incident really plays to what that image shows or conveys what measures someone takes in an activity. But instead you then want to take leaps from that to expand upon those to mean 'well its fine for night time too' -- this is your leap that my analogy was exposing. The daytime photo does not infer or project that there are no different dangers involved when you do something like.. make it nighttime.
It's ridiculous to point at these (dated) images and try to infer what is allowed or not from them. Besides, we all know Disney's quagmire about the beachfront and its identity has been a problem for AGES. They are part of the design, yet Disney has tried to relegate them down to be visual features only for a long time now. Disney's bipolar approach to resort recreation and resorts vs simple hotels has created this 'hung in the middle state' of the resorts for almost two decades.
I would expect a slow migration away from the beach concepts as the properties evolve... Disney has been half-pregnant on this topic for a long time... certainly this kind of incident will be impetuous to get over the hump. Much like the fencing topic around the existing pools was a similar topic that languished, yet found new life after incidents.
No body walks the grounds of the Poly or GF, sees wildlife, and says 'OMG, I can't believe that bird is actually here.. this is all an artificial environment Disney fully controls!'.. because we all have the common sense to recognize the managed and manicured grounds are all wide open and surrounded by open spaces. Disney manages pests, they don't create a Biosphere.