What are you upset about, then? The comments here are primarily aimed at the article, not
you -- and should not be regarded as a personal affront.
When any poster on this forum makes an error like that, they are flamed for it -- in good fun, of course. I have been corrected and flamed (in a joking manner) on numerous occasions for all kinds of stuff and we all just laugh about it.
Why put up an article when no one is allowed to critique it? Overall, it's a really bad article and some of the poorest writing I have ever seen -- but, that is what also makes it so funny, IMO. Again, that has *nothing* to do with you, no one is laughing at you or judging you-- stop looking for little things to get offended about.
I disagree.
http://fortune.com/2014/12/29/disney-ceo-bob-iger-empire-of-tech/
http://fortune.com/2014/12/29/millennium-falcon-bob-iger/
- http://fortune.com/2015/08/30/disney-infinity-critics/
- http://fortune.com/2015/08/26/star-wars-toys/
- http://fortune.com/2015/08/02/5things-july-employment-disney/
- http://fortune.com/2015/05/26/disney-walking-robot/
- http://fortune.com/video/2014/12/19...l&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
There's plenty more -- but, you get the point.
Disney should take a page from the high end fashion designers. If any fashion publication goes out of their way to insult the designer or the models they will be banned from attending the shows and previews the next season.
Disney and Bob Iger have been so kind to Fortune Magazine -- granting them exclusives and previews. The article doesn't reflect poorly on Disney at all, it reflects poorly on Fortune.
I know Disney PR isn't going to ban them but I would, which is why I am not in PR. LOL.
Agreed.
The wait times for the smaller rides have slightly increased while the wait times for the popular E tickets rides have substantially decreased -- it's a nice trade off.
It hasn't for me. OMG, I *love* FP+ so much -- way more than legacy fp.
Very well said and I couldn't agree more.
LOL. Funny post.