Kman101
Well-Known Member
IP in DAK is not blasphemy.
The nearest thing to UPcharged Flights of Wonder is the old Pocahontas show, which I think was cute. Fluff and a filler perhaps, but a fun way to show some animals combined with a way to see a princess in a more dignified way for adults than the kiddie theater of Belle or awkward meet&gropes.
But Pocahontas was part of a toon-ishy land, and FoW is part of Asia.
Also, IP-fication (UP-fication?) is destroying Disney at an alarming rate, this is another nail in the coffin of the WDW the world fell in love with. So by default this plan is a blow to the old skool fans.
I agree with this, to some degree. But you do realize the hundreds of thousands (millions?) of guests who only want IPs and will probably think this is the best thing ever. I sadly believe most of us here are in the minority. Most just won't care. Doesn't make it right, just how I think it is. Many guests think things without characters "isn't Disney enough" and it's a shame they seem to be listening to those fans.
UP in Flights of Wonders doesn't bother me TOO much. But it's a symptom of a bigger problem. I don't think using Russell is the worst idea. There are bigger IP shove-in's that just don't work so I'm not going to get too worked up over this (Guardians comes to mind in Epcot. They can show me as many concept art "pictures" of Star-Lord in Epcot all they want, and even if the ride is fun, it will NEVER fit to me. But I don't have an issue with Ratatouille, for example).
But, if this isn't proof of the "IP's everywhere" concept ... than I don't know what is. Again, I don't mind this too much as I hope it's well done and it doesn't seem like a big deal to me, but again, it's a symptom of a bigger problem.
And it's a shame the exterior of the theater is left like it is. I think it's really ugly. I miss how it was.