Family kicked off ship because 4 month old too young

sweetpee_1993

Well-Known Member
@sweetpee_1993 those are great points! When I buy travel insurance, I always make sure that I do have a lot of cover for the worst case scenario - like being stranded in a foreign country without being able to be transported back home. There was recently a story about a couple from the UK who travelled to New York. She was pregnant and had her baby prematurely. The baby needs to stay in the hospital in New York for 3 months. The story was about that the couple was faced with costs of 200.000 $ and problem with the travel insurance that only covered the mother, not the baby. Made me think twice about traveling while pregnant...
Both times I was pregnant the LAST thing I wanted to do was travel. I was in sheer misery. I'd rather be as comfortable as possible at home. Even before the boys were 1 or so, it was mind-boggling enough just to make a trip to Nana's house. My hat is off to parents who vacation with babies. I couldn't & didn't. :)
 

Phonedave

Well-Known Member
I read an article a few years ago about a guy on a shore excursion in like Turkey or something who tripped and hit his head. Had stitches. But then he ended up with a more extensive brain injury that required medical evac from some other far-away country. Just the medical flight was something like a quarter of a million bucks. If you look at your health insurance you'll see that often there's not coverage in other countries AND the medical transport coverage isn't all that much. Aside from the injury itself, the financial repercussions are potentially devastating to a family. It makes an unfortunate to tragic occurance even worse. So for my family, travel outside the country must include travel insurance. I buy mine from a secondary source, not Disney, because I can get better coverage for less $$. Definitely worth shopping! Also, check your credit cards. I've heard some offer travel insurance or options to buy travel insurance for reduced cost. ;)

@sweetpee_1993 those are great points! When I buy travel insurance, I always make sure that I do have a lot of cover for the worst case scenario - like being stranded in a foreign country without being able to be transported back home. There was recently a story about a couple from the UK who travelled to New York. She was pregnant and had her baby prematurely. The baby needs to stay in the hospital in New York for 3 months. The story was about that the couple was faced with costs of 200.000 $ and problem with the travel insurance that only covered the mother, not the baby. Made me think twice about traveling while pregnant...

It is part of the attitude that many people have: "Something went wrong with my life, and now it is up to others to make it better".

Guess, what, crap happens, and sometimes it sucks. You either plan ahead for it, or deal with the outcome. That is why they invented insurance.

If something happens (someone gets sick or hurt) and you did not get trip insurance, then that is your issue to deal with.

If your car gets banged up and you decided not get get collision insurance, than that is your issue to deal with.

If your apartment gets robbed, and you did not get renters insurance, then that is your problem to deal with.

Too often people expect to be "made whole" as if the universe somehow has to be "fair". Nope, it doesn't (and very often is not). In cases of real tragedy, society does tend to pull together and help out (natural disasters, horrible accidents, etc) but for a messed up vacation - not likely.

As an aside, I carry $1,000,000 in personal liability insurance. One close call was more than enough. The $150 or so extra a year it costs me is well worth protecting me and my family from the crazy lawsuits that are out there. I am sure there are many people out there who say "$150, I'm not spending that" but all it takes is one person to slip on some ice in front of your house, or a kid to ride a bike into your mailbox, or for the UPS guy to trip going down your stairs. Then you you are looking at a lawsuit where you could loose your house, and all of a sudden you wish you had spent $150.

-dave
 

Ralphlaw

Well-Known Member
I was once involved in a lawsuit where an infant died very suddenly after such symptoms. During the expert consultation process, dozens of potential diagnoses and symptoms were thrown around, including: Vaccine reaction, dehydration, SIDS, Rhys syndrome, medication allergies, hole in the heart, heart valve issues, viruses, thrombocytopenia, spinal cord problems, etc . . . Babies can indeed go downhill very quickly. Disney did the right thing because even a perfectly equipped children's hospital may not have been enough to save the baby in that case.

I wonder how well equipped the infirmaries on the Disney ships are. I assume they can deal with hundreds of different and moderately predictable medical issues, but obviously the specific issues of the very very young are better left onshore. Too bad for the family, but given the information available at the time, it appears that most of us on the boards agree that the right decision was made. Yeah, ultimately it was just a fussy tummy, but it could have been so much worse given the limited available info at the time.
 
Last edited:

SnarkyMonkey

Well-Known Member
Yes, I do believe that it is for the reasons of not being adequately equipped to deal with infant medical issues that Disney has changed the age limit for babies on their cruises.
 

LAKid53

Official Member of the Girly Girl Fan Club
Premium Member
Why would any parent bring a 4 month old on a cruise ship? And the mother even said her grandparents are very ill - did they also go on the cruise? I'm sure the ship's medical center can handle many medical issues but a sick 4 month old? Have parents lost their minds?

IMO, Disney shouldn't allow children under the age of 1 on any cruise.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom