Computer Magic
Well-Known Member
Very valid and good point. But I I don't think we can down play 41% no confidence vote. That was a HUGE slap in the face to Eisner and his ego. You don't see that very often and It was mentioned in ever major business magazine. That was a major accomplishment for Roy and Stan to pull that off.speck76 said:I guess this is a major issue for me.
Roy's efforts have all been based on argumentum ad misercordiam and much false to the theory of untestability.
In other words, Roy has been very good at an apeal to pity....the FANS like him, he is a Disney. He offers "sunshine and rainbows", and the fans feel that if they support him, all will be better. Yet really, what has he offered....he has bashed a lot, but where are the solutions, and anything he points out to be "wrong", may only be wrong from a fan point of view. Sure, Eisner got a 41% no confidence vote......funny, this would mean the most of the financial institutions voted to keep him on (WDC is 67.85% owned by banks and brokers).
Roy was on the board for a LONG time. He had the ability to make a difference, he did not. (Roy was also Chairman of the Animation Division for a long time......not much success there either)
To what Woody stated, Eisner cannot be under estimated. He countered Roy and Stan and avoided a coup.