ToTBellHop
Well-Known Member
I think people who don’t like it just suck at the game
I think people who don’t like it just suck at the game
Good choice. Figment popcorn bucket?I love how we can expect several years of complaints over whether these rides fit because their actual construction will be out of sight.
I’m going with white cheddar popcorn btw.
I understand why they don’t retell the stories 1 to 1, but if you aren’t going to at least recreate the most iconic and memorable parts of the IP, then why use the IP at all?For many years now Disney has been trying to stray away from book report rides and retelling the story of films on their attractions. As a sort of compromise to the IP mandate, many Imagineers would rather write a new story for these universes and characters instead of regurgitating what Hollywood has already put out. This is why we got Batuu instead of Tatooine; it's why Pandora, FEA, and Tiana's are all set years after their respective films.
Good choice. Figment popcorn bucket?
China has a vast species of animals and an incredibly landscape. That doesn't mean they should add a Mulan ride to Animal Kingdom.Your example doesn't make any sense since Sleeping Beauty takes place in France which doesn't have any connection to Animal Kingdom. Encanto "having animals in the film" isn't the reason why Encanto is a good fit. The characters live in Colombia, a South American country that's so rich in agriculture, it's landscape, and has a vast species of animals. All of South America ("Tropical Americas") has so much to explore that aligns with Animal Kingdom's mission.
Do you really expect Disney to build an Encanto ride that teaches people about animals? They could've had the Nemo ride in the Living Seas teach parkgoers about fish, but they didn't. They could've used the Ratatouille ride to teach parkgoers about France, but they didn't. They could've used the Guardians of the Galaxy ride to teach parkgoers about energy like the ride it was replacing, but they didn't. Disney doesn't do "edutainment" anymore, I see no reason to believe they'd do it here.Using the characters of Encanto is one way to teach us about all of it.
Frozen Ever After takes place after Frozen, but it still repeats many of the film's plot elements. Anna says "They were born ready!" at one point for no reason other than because she says something similar in the movie. Elsa is in her ice palace singing "Let It Go" for no reason other than because it's the most popular song from the movie. Olaf sings "In Summer" with all of the same lyrics from the movie for no reason other than because it's a song from the movie. The trolls appear simply because they were in the movie. Anna and Elsa randomly wear their Frozen Fever outfits for no reason other than because hey, people liked Frozen Fever, right?For many years now Disney has been trying to stray away from book report rides and retelling the story of films on their attractions. As a sort of compromise to the IP mandate, many Imagineers would rather write a new story for these universes and characters instead of regurgitating what Hollywood has already put out. This is why we got Batuu instead of Tatooine; it's why Pandora, FEA, and Tiana's are all set years after their respective films.
an eticket is also reportedly in the works....a 300 space Imagineering parking lot is not going backstage just for Indy and Encanto.Looks like AK is about to suffer the same fate DHS did 5 years ago.
Get an expensive overhaul for a section of the park that doesn't do much to increase overall capacity or solve the issue of a lack of rides with a height requirement. Encanto will be the only net gain in that sense.
The park will still need more than this, but will it get it in the next 5-10 years?
That simply isn't the goal of this project.Is there a net gain of attractions here??
We had TriceraTop Spin, Primeval Whirl, Dinosaur
Good! I was scared for a moment they would cheap out.I’ve always heard it’s a ride…
This has been repeated ad nauseum, but since you still deny it I'll keep throwing it at the wall for you.Y'know what's funny? When they wanted to put Moana in Animal Kingdom and I pointed out that it didn't fit in Animal Kingdom because, like Encanto, it is not about animals, others on here were claiming "Animal Kingdom's theme isn't actually animals, it's conservation". And yet here we have people insisting that an Encanto ride could be about animals because there's a minor character in the movie with a lot of animals. If Animal Kingdom's theme is actually conservation and not animals, doesn't that mean Encanto still doesn't fit? Or will the attraction actually have Mirabel going all Lorax and lecturing us about saving the rainforest?
This has been repeated ad nauseum, but since you still deny it I'll keep throwing it at the wall for you.
Joe Rohde (the lead designer of Disney's Animal Kingdom since its inception) has explicitly stated the themes of the park are as follows, "the intrinsic value of nature, psychological transformation through adventure, and a personal call to action." You can deny it all you'd like and you can even dislike it, but that doesn't change the fact that this is officially documented as the original artistic vision. "Animals" isn't a theme in the literary sense, it's a loose narrative thread. Kali River Rapids is a ride which came to the park in its early years and features no references to animals of any kind, but the ride does speak to the three main themes of Animal Kingdom as intended by the designers. Guests see the effect that deforestation can have on an ecosystem and are swept over a waterfall because of it. All themes present with no animals in sight.
I’d like the Mystic Manor ride with a Encanto theme of the house. No idea how possible that is.
Does Encanto have any of these themes? Isn't the plot of the movie actually about the house falling apart because everyone is at odds and all the pressure being put on them with their magic powers?the intrinsic value of nature, psychological transformation through adventure, and a personal call to action.
Well, actually, it was supposed to have animals, but then Disneyland Paris was a financial failure and the budget cuts started pouring in.Kali River Rapids is a ride which came to the park in its early years and features no references to animals of any kind, but the ride does speak to the three main themes of Animal Kingdom as intended by the designers. Guests see the effect that deforestation can have on an ecosystem and are swept over a waterfall because of it. All themes present with no animals in sight.
And once again, do you really expect Disney to do that? Disney doesn't do "edutainment" anymore - just look at what they're doing to EPCOT. I'd be shocked if the characters in the ride didn't sing "We Don't Talk About Bruno" at any point, even if the ride takes place after the movie.That said, it is genuinely not hard at all to imagine a version of this narrative where the characters of the film are actively saving or protecting an animal or its habitat, all while not going on a Lorax soapbox like you mentioned.
I keep forgetting, more attractions may reduce demand for Geine+ and ILL. Got it.That simply isn't the goal of this project.
Genuine expansion to WDW is coming, but Disney wants something on the docket that can open in the meantime.
That's this.
Moana also seems to be a more popular film than EncantoMoana is a conservation story...much like Pandora. The heart of T'fiti was stolen which put the world at odds...Restoring the heart of T'fiti puts the plundered sick world back in order... It is also about a love and respect for the Sea. Moana was not a difficult theme to bring into the Animal Kingdom...certainly an easier fit than Encanto...
Im not sure either one is really, both may have had a moment, but its just Disney pushes them at everybody.Moana also seems to be a more popular film than Encanto
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.