Considering how high the prices are now, they are probably still making as much or more on these sales. We'll see if they continue the rise. If they level off for a few years, that might be an indication that they feel that they have reached the tipping point for prices. Resale prices are also going up as well. We bought into SSR at under $90/point, and they are selling for $84-90 right now. We could sell (though we never will ), and actually break even or even make a small profit on our original outlay. And we have had 17 DVC vacations just in the last 6 years, and over 30 over-all.
I think if the prices remains fairly stable with minimal increases, the points will stabilize as well. I think they are very close to the tipping point already. We have 40 more points to purchase direct, to keep our contracts even for our 2 sons and their wives when we pass them along. After that, we will probably purchase additional points resale. DVC would have to come up with a significant discount for us to even consider direct in the future.How much longer can they raise prices so they can keep profits the same as points slide? Do you think the tipping point is around the corner or years away? Disney keeps moving towards a more upscale set of guests.
The only 2 "full" DVC resorts are SSR and OKW. I'm not sure how you can call the DVC offerings around MK as "niche". All other DVC offerings at WDW are part of a larger resort, so all of them could be called "niche" then.Could the drop be due to the focus on building niche DVC offerings around MK resorts? When was the last theme park based full DVC resort built?
Good point. We owned at SSR. For some reason I was thinking BW, BC were stand alone DVC.The only 2 "full" DVC resorts are SSR and OKW. I'm not sure how you can call the DVC offerings around MK as "niche". All other DVC offerings at WDW are part of a larger resort, so all of them could be called "niche" then.
look at the last three DVC properties... all very high end costs.. and Poly isn't that big in number of units.
Add to that the incredible climb in costs...
DVC doesn't have to worry about the points trend if they can keep the real numbers where they need them. They aren't reporting that kind of metric to the street.
I don't believe it's a matter of "lower occupancy" or "less people coming". Disney reported record theme park attendance in 2015 while hotel occupancy was nearly at pre-recession levels.Won't lower point trends lead to lower occupancy? It's a question, not a statement. If so, does that call into question the long term strategy of the DVC prioritzation? Sure you can hit revenue targets by jacking up prices, but won't that be offset if in the future, less people are coming? It's kind of what started the DVC swing into high gear. Hotel occupancy falls, Disney raises prices to make up for lost revenue. Then they sell DVC as a discount on future trips. What happens if points trends deplete due to higher costs and DVC occupancy stagnates?
Won't lower point trends lead to lower occupancy? It's a question, not a statement. If so, does that call into question the long term strategy of the DVC prioritzation? Sure you can hit revenue targets by jacking up prices, but won't that be offset if in the future, less people are coming? It's kind of what started the DVC swing into high gear. Hotel occupancy falls, Disney raises prices to make up for lost revenue. Then they sell DVC as a discount on future trips. What happens if points trends deplete due to higher costs and DVC occupancy stagnates?
My big question is how long doc can continue with one big pool of properties where everyone's points are equal value... While prices continue to climb.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.