-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
Donald Donald Donald.. Another Disney Law Suit
- Thread starter hrcollectibles
- Start date
Grizzly Hall 71
New Member
Well I guess they'll re consider the whole FLE won't they?
Joking. But come on, really you've waited all this time and now want to bring it to the light?
Joking. But come on, really you've waited all this time and now want to bring it to the light?
wizards8507
Active Member
My favorite part is the "physical injury" she claims to have sustained. This must have been some hard-core gropage to inflict "physical trauma."
I guess Donald likes it rough.:lookaroun
Tom
Beta Return
He's always had a little anger/aggression problem. It doesn't take much to set him off, I've noticed.
GrumpyFan
Well-Known Member
This is going a whole different direction, but I would love to hear Donald's response to these allegations. Somebody should make a mashup video or something and post it to YouTube, "unofficially" of course. I think it would make for some major hilarity. I'm sure he's not able to respond though, due to the corporate lawyers, in fact I wouldn't be surprised if he's been suspended without paying pending a full investigation. :lol:
Tom
Beta Return
I like your idea. A clip-video could be funny!
In all seriousness though, I bet they don't even know "who" Donald was at the time of the alleged incident. At least I hope that's the case, because whoever the CM was does NOT deserve to go through the same B.S. that Tigger did. Thats a lot of wasted time in the judicial system he'll never get back.
There is a good possibility that he/she no longer even works for Disney.
Another potential reason they waited two years to file the suit....
Tom
Beta Return
Right. Nobody to defend themselves. I guess that's why the suit is against "Disney" this time, and not an individual, like Tigger.
xtina72
New Member
Years ago, I was probably 18, MAYBE 19, I was taking a picture with one of the chipmunks (either chip or dale) and my father who IS and WAS the worst at taking pictures was taking forever to get the camera right and so as Im standing there with the chipmunk he starts rubbing my back and then he put it around my waist and squeezed, it was pretty sexual, not terribly so, but not something a stranger should do to ANYONE, I turned to him and I said "Are you done? Now take your damned hand off me." and he did, quickly I might add, my dad took the pic and it was done.
Was I SCARRED? No, Im perfectly fine, it happens, its life. Not everyone is very nice, get the frig over it.
Was I SCARRED? No, Im perfectly fine, it happens, its life. Not everyone is very nice, get the frig over it.
Tom
Beta Return
Interesting....because the chipmunks are also very "small" individuals, like Donald. :lookaroun
Yup!! Looking for money
People who file these types suits years after an event must honestly believe
the general population as a whole is ignorant, let alone lawyers for Disney.
It appears the only evidence is the "victims" testamony. Why wait two years.....movtive MONEY.:hammer: :brick:
People who file these types suits years after an event must honestly believe
the general population as a whole is ignorant, let alone lawyers for Disney.
It appears the only evidence is the "victims" testamony. Why wait two years.....movtive MONEY.:hammer: :brick:
Tom
Beta Return
When you're that stupid, your little mind can only assume that everyone else is that stupid too.
Again, Natural Selection is failing us!
stuart
Well-Known Member
The woman is quite clearly a mentalist.
If she lists all those phyiscal / psychological complaints because of what she alleges happened with Donald - i would ideally like to know what she would list if there was something like a workplace 'incident' - even if it was something such as a humiliating incident / practical joke.
She can't perform her 'daily duties' yet she manages to get in touch with a lawyer and file a lawsuit?
And you would think at the meet and greet they would have been in the company of fellow guests, who you would imagine would have perhaps said something to a cast member (or the nutter concerned) if they had concerns about the behaviour of donald.
If she lists all those phyiscal / psychological complaints because of what she alleges happened with Donald - i would ideally like to know what she would list if there was something like a workplace 'incident' - even if it was something such as a humiliating incident / practical joke.
She can't perform her 'daily duties' yet she manages to get in touch with a lawyer and file a lawsuit?
And you would think at the meet and greet they would have been in the company of fellow guests, who you would imagine would have perhaps said something to a cast member (or the nutter concerned) if they had concerns about the behaviour of donald.
stewdog1
Active Member
He probably thought you just turned 18 and was excited you were legal.
But you never know, it could have just been something innocent and that person not really paying attention.
Still not appropriate though.
Timekeeper
Well-Known Member
This reminds me that being in-costume is too often an excuse to commit acts that would otherwise qualify as a battery (offensive touching). There's something about wearing a costume that psychologically affects a person's behavior. Ask any person who has worked in costume, OR, remember the last time that you [anyone] wore a Halloween costume. We all behave differently, whether we are trying to get "in character," or are merely acting in a different manner because no one knows our true identity.
Although characters are usually well behaved, we must all admit that many of them (furry more than face) touch guests in a way that, although not inappropriate, would not be acceptable if coming from a complete stranger on a bus, subway, sidewalk, or anywhere else. Characters are, in actuality, complete strangers, but we let down our guard because the character being portrayed is familiar, or at least not threatening. In a similar vein, the news media likes to point out that a [character name] committed the crime, with less emphasis on the identity of the actor. It makes for better [more dramatic] news to point the finger at a familiar face, even if that face is animated.
Lastly, I hesitate to accept the "it happens, it's life" justification for offensive (immoral or illegal) behavior.
mp2bill
Well-Known Member
"Magolon said that she is traumatized two years after the incident and suffers from anxiety, headaches, nausea, cold sweats, insomnia, nightmares, flashbacks and digestive problems."
Really? Digestive problems from being "groped?" Also, insomnia and nightmares? Isn't kind of hard to have the latter when you have the former? She sure does have a lot of problems from having the equivalent of a hockey glove put on her .
mp2bill
Well-Known Member
Oh yeah, I hadn't thought about that.
EaglesfanNJ
Active Member
:ROFLOL: I go into Wawa this morning, grab my coffee, and the Philadelphia Daily News. It was early so when i saw Donald Duck on the frong page, you can imagine my surprise
. Too bad it was not a nice story though.