mahnamahna101
Well-Known Member
Well that's why they've got to fix up the other 3 parks. Once that's done, they need to do little things for MK (increase Peter Pan's capacity, fix up IASW/Splash/Space/Big Thunder, replace Stitch with something worthwhile, make PeopleMover a worthwhile attraction, bring back all of the cut entertainment, rework backstage infrastructure for post 2021 expansion, etc)I don't track Universal's attendance. (That's other people's wheelhouse) However.... in the past 10 years, MK & the resort as a whole have grown 20%. Epcot at 16%, DAK at 26%. Out of those 10 years, the previous 3 are showing a troubling trend in how the Disney parks are growing; MK's growth rate is double that of the other parks. Since 2011, MK grew 13% while the other parks are right around 6%, resort as a whole is around 8.5%.
Its a troublesome trend.
Then, once the 50th celebration has worn, they can start expanding with some major high-capacity people-eaters to replace low-capacity areas (Princess Fairytale Hall, Tomorrowland Speedway, the tents in Storybook Circus) and to ease tension on older headliners (Big Thunder/Splash/HM, POTC/JC, Space) ... 2,500+/hr minimum.
If TDO were smart, they'd start to figure out how to do 3,000-4,000/hr for all future E-tickets. PeopleMover-esque capacity levels are what MK desperately needs for any major additions, here on out.
NFL is partially why MK has increased far more than the other 3, since the other 3 haven't added anything since Star Tours II. MK will start to stay flat or even slightly decline once Pandora and the DHS redo start to take effect.
It is troublesome to some degree, but, everything has got to be factored in. I have said before and I will repeat... percentages mean absolutely nothing. It depends on where it started. For example, revenue wise what would be better 13% of 19,000,000 or 20 percent of 10,000,000? Everything has a ceiling someplace. If Mk is crowded now, what would happen if it continued at 13%? Just the numbers will automatically reduce the percentage if everything remained the same actual, count wise. The comparison (Uni) was much smaller to begin with and had a lot more room for growth. Percentages do not pay the bills, head counts do. It only represents a decline in percentage not in business. There has to be a place where it is not only unreasonable to expect the same percentage of growth and even where it becomes unwise to even try due to the inability to take care of the additional.
Take the 19 mil. and add another 13% increase. That would be a head count of 2.5 million. At this stage in the game would that even be doable. In my opinion MK does not have a enough room to continue even on the pace it is at, much less increase it. That is why it is wise to concentrate on the other 3 parks to disperse whatever additional growth and spread them out a bit. Also, I believe, the main motivation for MM+... control of crowd locations.
Indeed... fix Epcot and get it to 17-18 million a year (with room for 100,000+ at any given time, Epcot could sustain those level of numbers far better than MK), get DHS/AK to 14-15 million each, while doing little things to increase MK's current capacity (Stitch replacement, PeopleMover overhaul with actual show scenes/AAs, return of cut entertainment like Golden Horseshoe, somehow increasing Peter Pan's hourly capacity, etc)
After the other 3 parks are up to speed, start working on high-capacity expansions for MK (all semi-major/major attractions from here on should have 2,500/hr minimum, 3,000-4,000/hr should be the goal). This would be further down the road, though. MK's fine until 2020/2021.
40-45%? That's quite a lofty goal... especially if AK, Epcot and DHS increase over the next 10 years. I'd love to see it, thoughUniversal has gone from 14% market share in 2007 to 22.4% market share now. They are aiming at 40%-45%.
There is absolutely no reason for Disney to even notice what Un i is doing up the road.