StarWarsGirl
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
I would think that has to violate SOME sort of Copyright law.
Not copyright. Trademark.I would think that has to violate SOME sort of Copyright law.
I think, though, that it has to be a work of art for that rule to apply. Unless they found a loophole.Not copyright. Trademark.
And, odds are, it's fair use (parody).
True. Rather, that's not really Darth Vader, it's Darth Carwash.I think, though, that it has to be a work of art for that rule to apply. Unless they found a loophole.
http://money.cnn.com/2014/02/10/news/companies/dumb-starbucks-prank/index.html
Either that, or the operation is too small to be noticed by the Empire (or the lawyers...)True. Rather, that's not really Darth Vader, it's Darth Carwash.
So, not trademark infringement.
I find your lack of paralegals disturbing...Either that, or the operation is too small to be noticed by the Empire (or the lawyers...)
They all called in sick today...I find your lack of paralegals disturbing...
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.