I'm starting to get PTSD from that thread about cuts coming because of A RECESSION or because disney is cheap.
Good. The more people that do this, the more incentive Disney will have to bring back the perks and add some new ones in there as well. I know I have an offsite stay coming up. Disney's hotels were too expensive and no good deals for passholders either.Other than bus service to and from parks I can't think of any benefit that can explain the high cost. If I'm already staying off site, I'll likely just start using Uber to get around (what I save is room costs will likely pay for that, plus it's more reliable) and I'll probably be eating more meals off property too; most likely breakfast and lunch, since those are easy things I could pick up at a grocery without needing a kitchen to eat. When it comes to shopping, I'm more likely to head to an outlet now because even though I love the restaurants in DS the shops either don't appeal to me or are too expensive. It's not necessarily the removal of ME that caused this, more the removal of all the key perks that made it worth staying onsite being removed.
The transportation one, would add to front line cost. Which would mean more bodies to see you have a ticket which means more CM pay and lesser revenue.
The parking fee is easier to mandate because they just have to assume your there. Simple.
This isn't going to impact the general public who visit the place once a decade or lifetime.
Most of us here have a sensitivity to the historical decrease in service/ increase in price over the last two decades. Of course, that's not going to stop most people here from doling out cash. I swear, Disney could bolt live children in Small World and most folks here wouldn't blink an eye with their wallets.
I agree in part, but does Disney have enough parking lots to accommodate large increases in cars at the onsite hotels? I doubt Disney wants to invest in that construction and maintenance costs, not to mention the additional costs to create proper stormwater systems and retention areas to offset the amount of impermeable pavement, plus the requirement to offset "developed" land with additional greenspace.It makes lots of sense. They can't charge you a parking fee if you don't have a car and used the bus, but this way they can charger you every night you are there letting your rental car just gather dust in the parking lot of the resort. My guess is they decided they made more from the parking fees than they would make from insuring you couldn't sneak off and get a reasonable priced meal once in a while.
The straw that broke the camels back is a perfect way to put it.I think this is what a lot of people saying this is no big deal and won't cause anyone to cancel a trip isn't getting. It might not cause cancelled trips, but there's a big opportunity for a ripple effect here. Just as an example; this is the straw that broke the camel's back for me when it comes to staying onsite. Other than bus service to and from parks I can't think of any benefit that can explain the high cost. If I'm already staying off site, I'll likely just start using Uber to get around (what I save is room costs will likely pay for that, plus it's more reliable) and I'll probably be eating more meals off property too; most likely breakfast and lunch, since those are easy things I could pick up at a grocery without needing a kitchen to eat. When it comes to shopping, I'm more likely to head to an outlet now because even though I love the restaurants in DS the shops either don't appeal to me or are too expensive. It's not necessarily the removal of ME that caused this, more the removal of all the key perks that made it worth staying onsite being removed. And when people aren't staying onsite, spending the entire vacation at Disney is no longer the most convenient option. It's not inconvenient, exactly. But it's just not the no-brainer it used to be.
Death by a thousand cuts is an accurate description here. Just one of the recent cuts would not have been a huge deal, but all the things added together are really hurting the value of the resorts' premium cost.
I agree in part, but does Disney have enough parking lots to accommodate large increases in cars at the onsite hotels? I doubt Disney wants to invest in that construction and maintenance costs, not to mention the additional costs to create proper stormwater systems and retention areas to offset the amount of impermeable pavement, plus the requirement to offset "developed" land with additional greenspace.
I really think another option will be introduced, but it will involve a fee.
That’s just funny.This isn't going to impact the general public who visit the place once a decade or lifetime.
Most of us here have a sensitivity to the historical decrease in service/ increase in price over the last two decades. Of course, that's not going to stop most people here from doling out cash. I swear, Disney could bolt live children in Small World and most folks here wouldn't blink an eye with their wallets.
There is a lot of parking at Boardwalk too. I just had to walk what feels like a half a mile from the parking lot to my hotel room.Some of the older resorts probably do because of how spread out they are. There's a tons of parking at Port Orleans Riverside, for example -- there are decent sized lots at every single building. Both times I've had my car there in the last few years the parking lots weren't even remotely close to being full; they were at less than 50% capacity.
The posts are still moderated.They fired the person who moderated comments.
Yes, but, for me personally, my nostalgic fondness was formed when I was the child (back in the 80’s and early 90’s) and not the overstressed father trying to maneuver the logistics in making this all work.I haven't gone through every single post, but I have to laugh a little about this. So many of us reminisce about how amazing Disney once was and how it's gone downhill. All of my trips as a kid and young adult were in a time with...
- No fast passes
- No extra magic hours
- No real park hopping
- No dining plan
- No Magical Express
Disney is starting to sound a lot like "the good ole days." Yes, I know a version of hopping is being brought back and resort parking fees are being assessed, but still...it's just kind of funny (not in the ha ha way) of how this all looks. That being said, I used the feature when we would fly to WDW, and while it saved some costs, it always kind of frustrated me. So, I'm mixed on it being cut.
The posts are still moderated.
Oh, so the recession is why they are "retheming" Splash Mountain, one of Disney's most popular rides. They have money to spend where they want to spend it.Fixed that for you...
Interestingly it seems that post pandemic travel planning is extremely hot right now. I guess there is much pent up demand. But as to the reality of when that pent up demand can be transformed into actual travel is anyone's guess. If so, this change most affects the repeat guests that know about MDE and frequent WDW, and who are probably yearning to get back to WDW. As to whether it changes anyones eventual plans, who know...But it certainly doesn't help build the WDW brand....right now anway.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.