Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
Ask yourself (for academic purposes):
What makes more sense -
1. A gut of existing pavilions with high costs for IP retrofits?
2. New pavilions that haven’t been added for 31 (and counting) years?
One options has been done already 3 times in the last 15 years ...and the other is where “insiders” have been trying to trap a unicorns (unsuccessfully) for decades.
Maybe both will happen? Maybe neither? But start from the place that makes sense and then judge your rumors.
What makes more sense -
1. A gut of existing pavilions with high costs for IP retrofits?
2. New pavilions that haven’t been added for 31 (and counting) years?
One options has been done already 3 times in the last 15 years ...and the other is where “insiders” have been trying to trap a unicorns (unsuccessfully) for decades.
Maybe both will happen? Maybe neither? But start from the place that makes sense and then judge your rumors.