Disney Stock Approaching 9 Year Low

Chef Mickey

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
At $85, Disney is nearing a 9 year low.

Over 5 years, Disney stock has returned an embarrassing -23% while the S&P500 is +52%. Inexcusable.

What a shame that a leader can be this mismanaged to the point of struggling to even grow their business.

TV is a shambles and shrinking, Disney+ is still hemorrhaging money, movies are flopping, and the parks bright spot is only through pricing increases which showed to be slowing the the last report.

Disney has the some the worst management in the S&P500. I'm devastated Iger got more time after shortly being happy he was back over Chapek. Iger is just as bad. Overpaid for Fox, ruined the parks, and allowed politics to run his company. The Board is clueless and corrupt too. All of them need to go.

As a shareholder, I'm disappointed, but as a fan I'm actually sad.

I'm holding as a takeover or activist target. What a piece of trash.
 

el_super

Well-Known Member
We are witnessing the end of the Walt Disney company. It will close soon, as I very well predicted.

Makes sense. All goods things come to an end right?

We knew linear TV wasn't going to last. With video games, social media and YouTube, why would anyone need scripted TV or live sports any more?

Movie theaters have been dying since home video came out and the parks? In 10 or 20 years, climate change will make Florida uninhabitable. Being outside will be too uncomfortable for most people and keeping the parks staffed will become financially impossible.

If Iger was smart he would be selling off WDW for a solar farm while he can still get some.money for it.
 

Dranth

Well-Known Member
The whole movie and TV industry has been getting smacked around for years because they all face the same issues.
  • Streaming is hard to make profitable and will take a good while, if ever, to fully replace the amount of money linear was bringing in.
  • Linear itself is plummeting and will be a distant memory before long as people are done with that model.
  • Movies are failing more often across the board at the box office. Just this year, something like 40% of domestic releases have made any money at all. Only a hand full have made enough to move the needle for a company. You basically need a Mario to cover all the rest of your losses at the box office and end the year with a single digit profit margin.
  • Studios can often make up those losses in the aftermarket through streaming agreements, rentals, digital purchases, and some physical sales. In some cases, they can even merchandize their way to profits but they are still starting in a larger hole than the past.
Just for comparison, pure entertainment companies over that same time have fared just as bad and often worse than Disney:
  • Paramount is down 72%
  • Lionsgate is down 69%
  • Fox no longer exists as a studio
  • Warner is down 47% and it has only been split off from AT&T for a bit over a year.
  • IMAX is down 22%
  • AMC is down 78%
  • Regal filed bankruptcy
The only ones that have done well are the ones that have additional products or services to offset the nose dive entertainment has been going through.

Comcast is a great example. They are up 26% over the last five years but they are the largest provider of internet in the US having over 32 million customers. That is a massive amount of income each month to help offset any entertainment issues. Even so, the stock has significantly underperformed the S&P over that same time.

Bottom line, all entertainment stocks stink. They have for a while and they are going to until answers are found for replacing the massive losses in income from traditional sources.

I am not a fan of Iger but no entertainment company is going to get great results in the current environment.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
The whole movie and TV industry has been getting smacked around for years because they all face the same issues.
  • Streaming is hard to make profitable and will take a good while, if ever, to fully replace the amount of money linear was bringing in.
  • Linear itself is plummeting and will be a distant memory before long as people are done with that model.
  • Movies are failing more often across the board at the box office. Just this year, something like 40% of domestic releases have made any money at all. Only a hand full have made enough to move the needle for a company. You basically need a Mario to cover all the rest of your losses at the box office and end the year with a single digit profit margin.
  • Studios can often make up those losses in the aftermarket through streaming agreements, rentals, digital purchases, and some physical sales. In some cases, they can even merchandize their way to profits but they are still starting in a larger hole than the past.
Just for comparison, pure entertainment companies over that same time have fared just as bad and often worse than Disney:
  • Paramount is down 72%
  • Lionsgate is down 69%
  • Fox no longer exists as a studio
  • Warner is down 47% and it has only been split off from AT&T for a bit over a year.
  • IMAX is down 22%
  • AMC is down 78%
  • Regal filed bankruptcy
The only ones that have done well are the ones that have additional products or services to offset the nose dive entertainment has been going through.

Comcast is a great example. They are up 26% over the last five years but they are the largest provider of internet in the US having over 32 million customers. That is a massive amount of income each month to help offset any entertainment issues. Even so, the stock has significantly underperformed the S&P over that same time.

Bottom line, all entertainment stocks stink. They have for a while and they are going to until answers are found for replacing the massive losses in income from traditional sources.

I am not a fan of Iger but no entertainment company is going to get great results in the current environment.
You think Disney is more comparable to Paramount, AMC, and Lionsgate than, say, Comcast, Netflix, or Amazon?
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
86isFine.jpg
 

Mmoore29

Well-Known Member
I don't know if this is the end of Disney. They most likely will survive, but it will take alot of upheaval; and selling off assets as well.
Disney isn't going to retrench to unwind mergers. The idea that it would be better off returning to its 1995 size is ludicrous. You need scale to survive the modern age. Sacrificing ABC, Pixar, Marvel, Lucasfilm and Fox just for one-time cash flow is shortsighted and self-destructive.
 
Last edited:

flynnibus

Premium Member
You think Disney is more comparable to Paramount, AMC, and Lionsgate than, say, Comcast, Netflix, or Amazon?

Netflix and Amazon are not legacy entertainment companies nor do they have a large component of their company based on theatrical releases and linear TV
Comcast bought/merged with a legacy entertainment company... but it's all less than 1/3rd of the company's business
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Disney was $20 at the end of Eisner's era. It's 4.25 times that. Disney's market cap was $28 billion in 2004. Disney's market cap now is over $160 billion. This is a perfectly healthy company, and it's nowhere near the Eisner lows.
Just joking. The fact is TWDC has too many institutional investors to be allowed to fail.
 

Dranth

Well-Known Member
You think Disney is more comparable to Paramount, AMC, and Lionsgate than, say, Comcast, Netflix, or Amazon?
Netflix is a reasonable comparison and over the last five years their stock is up 12% so also lagging behind the S&P. No doubt significantly better than Disney but again, not great. Give Netflix linear programming and their stock drops.

Comcast is more diversified than Disney and has a built-in revenue generator in what essentially amounts to a utility at this point that Disney does not and will never have. I think people severely underestimate how big that is. Basically 20ish% of all US households must pay Comcast every month to stay online. Without that do you think their stock would be doing as well? Even with that it is trailing the S&P by a healthy amount which is what the original poster was using as a measure.

Amazon is not comparable. It is a massively profitable store and tech giant with AWS offerings. Sales on the website alone bring in more money than the entire Disney company makes in a year and so does AWS. Prime video is the only thing they really have that is comparable and if Amazon suddenly was left with just that, they wouldn't be doing great either.

So yes, when looking at the entire company, I think Disney is more comparable to pure entertainment companies as that is all they offer. It still isn't a great comparison but it is the closet in terms of product diversification. Now if you are looking at individual segments, that is a whole other story. Want to just look at parks, Comcast is the best comparison. Looking at studios, any of the major ones. Streaming, again, any of the major ones. Same with TV or merch sales.

The whole point is that any company that has a significant portion of its business squarely in the entertainment industry is going to be underperforming the market at large. How much depends on what else the company has to balance out the panic from the street.
 

SpectreJordan

Well-Known Member
The whole movie and TV industry has been getting smacked around for years because they all face the same issues.
  • Streaming is hard to make profitable and will take a good while, if ever, to fully replace the amount of money linear was bringing in.
  • Linear itself is plummeting and will be a distant memory before long as people are done with that model.
  • Movies are failing more often across the board at the box office. Just this year, something like 40% of domestic releases have made any money at all. Only a hand full have made enough to move the needle for a company. You basically need a Mario to cover all the rest of your losses at the box office and end the year with a single digit profit margin.
  • Studios can often make up those losses in the aftermarket through streaming agreements, rentals, digital purchases, and some physical sales. In some cases, they can even merchandize their way to profits but they are still starting in a larger hole than the past.
Just for comparison, pure entertainment companies over that same time have fared just as bad and often worse than Disney:
  • Paramount is down 72%
  • Lionsgate is down 69%
  • Fox no longer exists as a studio
  • Warner is down 47% and it has only been split off from AT&T for a bit over a year.
  • IMAX is down 22%
  • AMC is down 78%
  • Regal filed bankruptcy
The only ones that have done well are the ones that have additional products or services to offset the nose dive entertainment has been going through.

Comcast is a great example. They are up 26% over the last five years but they are the largest provider of internet in the US having over 32 million customers. That is a massive amount of income each month to help offset any entertainment issues. Even so, the stock has significantly underperformed the S&P over that same time.

Bottom line, all entertainment stocks stink. They have for a while and they are going to until answers are found for replacing the massive losses in income from traditional sources.

I am not a fan of Iger but no entertainment company is going to get great results in the current environment.
I wonder if there's any way for them to go back to what we used to have or are audiences too far gone into the digital age? Audiences still crave TV shows & movies, I imagine they consume them more now than ever with the ease of access. But they want them in specific ways that are clearly harder to monetize.
 

Chef Mickey

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Netflix is a reasonable comparison and over the last five years their stock is up 12% so also lagging behind the S&P. No doubt significantly better than Disney but again, not great. Give Netflix linear programming and their stock drops.

Comcast is more diversified than Disney and has a built-in revenue generator in what essentially amounts to a utility at this point that Disney does not and will never have. I think people severely underestimate how big that is. Basically 20ish% of all US households must pay Comcast every month to stay online. Without that do you think their stock would be doing as well? Even with that it is trailing the S&P by a healthy amount which is what the original poster was using as a measure.

Amazon is not comparable. It is a massively profitable store and tech giant with AWS offerings. Sales on the website alone bring in more money than the entire Disney company makes in a year and so does AWS. Prime video is the only thing they really have that is comparable and if Amazon suddenly was left with just that, they wouldn't be doing great either.

So yes, when looking at the entire company, I think Disney is more comparable to pure entertainment companies as that is all they offer. It still isn't a great comparison but it is the closet in terms of product diversification. Now if you are looking at individual segments, that is a whole other story. Want to just look at parks, Comcast is the best comparison. Looking at studios, any of the major ones. Streaming, again, any of the major ones. Same with TV or merch sales.

The whole point is that any company that has a significant portion of its business squarely in the entertainment industry is going to be underperforming the market at large. How much depends on what else the company has to balance out the panic from the street.
Good points. I'd agree an entertainment company may underperform the broader index, but Disney is still a fantastic brand with unbelievable assets, consumer credibility, diversified entertainment options, products, and a huge streaming platform.

It's a travesty Disney is worth less than Netflix as Disney has many other businesses and much more IP than NFLX. The fact the market values them more than Disney is proof of Disney's ineptitude.

NFLX at +13% isn't good for 5 years, but it's a hell of a lot better than -23% from Disney with what should be a far better company. Disney has problem assets, but those have been poorly managed.

You can say Disney's linear networks are an anchor all you want, but it's poor management. They are still profitable and should be managed with careful decision making to continue to make them profitable as they shrink and other businesses grow. That's management which Disney doesn't have. They paid ESPN talent far too much and stopped being a sports channel. ABC has awful content in general. They overpaid for sporting rights too.

Prior to 2020, Disney is fully capable of $12B+ net income annually while Netflix is making $4-5B. Now Disney is making $3B. I get it, some TV challenges exist and margins have changed, but it's just been handled so poorly. Every quarter they have some "special item" that kills their profitablity. They did a decent job with Disney+ but failed to control spending and implement a profitable pricing model so now that's a drain too.

Amazon isn't "massively profitable" on the retail side. From memory, they literally have 1% margins and most of their profit is AWS and Prime. Not arguing they are comparable with Disney, they aren't.

Disney is unique and a leader in entertainment. They have the highest quality assets by far. They have parks which have been extremely profitable. They have consumer products, a worldwide brand, ESPN, Hulu, Fox, Disney+, and others which they continually overspend and fail to promote a decent strategy. They lose money consistently and only make money at parks through pricing power.

I just really think Disney's board and management team is lost. The fact they even made Chapek CEO shows they are idiots but when they finally realized he was terrible, they brought back another dinosaur that had his run because they didn't know what else to do. I think Iger is horrible for Disney at this time. They need a younger, hungrier CEO with more energy and can play both sides.
 

Dranth

Well-Known Member
Good points. I'd agree an entertainment company may underperform the broader index, but Disney is still a fantastic brand with unbelievable assets, consumer credibility, diversified entertainment options, products, and a huge streaming platform.
Agreed.

It's a travesty Disney is worth less than Netflix as Disney has many other businesses and much more IP than NFLX. The fact the market values them more than Disney is proof of Disney's ineptitude.

NFLX at +13% isn't good for 5 years, but it's a hell of a lot better than -23% from Disney with what should be a far better company. Disney has problem assets, but those have been poorly managed.
Agreed but I think this is mostly due to the tech company craze that has gripped Wallstreet for a good while now. Rightly or wrongly, Netflix was viewed as a growth company while Disney was not. That is part of Iger's mistake in my book, trying to treat Disney as a tech company and get the stock benefits that come along with that.

You can say Disney's linear networks are an anchor all you want, but it's poor management. They are still profitable and should be managed with careful decision making to continue to make them profitable as they shrink and other businesses grow. That's management which Disney doesn't have. They paid ESPN talent far too much, focused way too much on politics, and stopped being a sports channel. ABC has awful content in general. They overpaid for sporting rights too.
Maybe, but the core problem in terms of stock price isn't that they don't make money, it is that it is a shrinking market and THAT is a non-starter for the types of investors that actually move pricing. Disney gets punished for it despite them still being profitable. They could bring in the best management team to ever exist and while it would help across the board, it wouldn't stop the decline in viewers.

Amazon isn't "massively profitable" on the retail side. From memory, they literally have 1% margins and most of their profit is AWS and Prime. Not arguing they are comparable with Disney, they aren't.
Fair point. I should have been clearer and noted when talking about revenue or profit. Let's just say Amazon, as a company, is massively profitable and not a good comparable.

Disney is unique and a leader in entertainment. They have the highest quality assets by far. They have parks which have been extremely profitable. They have consumer products, a worldwide brand, ESPN, Hulu, Fox, Disney+, and others which they continually overspend and fail to promote a decent strategy. They lose money consistently and only make money at parks through pricing power.
Agreed, though to be fair I think Iger already addressed one of the main problems with the studios where they are now once again responsible for their profitability. As for streaming, it is on pace to meet their goals so should stop being a drag on the rest of the company soon. Unless I am missing something, everything else already makes money.

I just really think Disney's board and management team is lost. The fact they even made Chapek CEO shows they are idiots but when they finally realized he was terrible, they brought back another dinosaur that had his run because they didn't know what else to do. I think Iger is horrible for Disney at this time. They need a younger, hungrier CEO with more energy and can play both sides.
Agreed though I will still take a horrible Iger over the travesty that was Chapek.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom