I never complain about the liberal media. I don't think they're nearly liberal enough ... if they had been doing their jobs right, then a lot of what went down in the last decade might not have.
Before you use this as an opportunity to get this thread deleted by yet again violating the rules on political discussion, it was an analogy to illustrate how your comments about what websites should be covering mirror those who claim the media don't cover what is important either.
It was an illustration, nothing more.
Jake, you care or you wouldn't waste your time posting about it. I'd say you have an unhealthy obsession about something that is simply a concern of mine and a very small one in the fabric of my life.
Yet you spend 1-2 hours every night posting about it and attempt to weave it into every conversation you have here.
And inability to act? What would you like me to do ... get Meg Crofton on the phone and suggest she keep folks like Lou Mongello, Tom What's His Face, Ricky Brigante, Jeff Lange and about 200 others out of the parks? Disney likes what these folks are doing ... whoring for the company.
I stated quite clearly what actions you could take below.
Jake, anyone can challenge me on anything I post. That's what DISCUSSION boards are for. I have no desire to start a blog, anymore than I have to be on a podcast (and believe me, I know you'll say you won't, but I'd have all sorts of very important folks listening if I ever opted to tell some tales about what Disney doesn't want its fans and consumers to know).
So you have the ear of the company to influence change and you choose not to?
I'm not looking to do anything more than stimulate discussion, interest and thought. It's very simple.
So again, you really aren't interested in correcting the problem or making any sort of effort to provide a balance viewpoint in the same format that others are getting their misinformation?
And the only thing I really see from you is complaining about my complaining.
Who does that?
~I got nothin~
There it is. I actually do present an opinion and discussion that challenges you to act on your long winded diatribes about the evils of social media, and the only thing you can do ultimately is pigeonhole.
I don't see is as complaining about your complaining, I see it as a question as to why do you choose not to act on something that you clearly see as a problem?
The tools are available to more effectively present your case to the public than you are doing now, yet you choose not to use them. It's like you are holding a bucket of soapy water, standing in front of a dirty car and yelling that the people washing it are doing it wrong.
