Splash4eva
Well-Known Member
They can “plan” all they want but history has told us otherwise not to mention what Disney over spends on projects
They can “plan” all they want but history has told us otherwise not to mention what Disney over spends on projects
When the $17 billion number came out, didn't Len show some numbers that showed that was really not a large increase from what they currently were spending on just general upkeep? Or am I remembering this wrong? It'd be interesting to see if this could be interpreted similarly, or if there is a real possibility of significant expansion for the parks (I definitely think they are going in harder on Cruise lines, and I bet the new island is a part of this).
Disney has been dumping billions and billions and BILLIONS into Disney Plus and it has not even given $.01 cent back in return! Even when Disney Plus reaches it's first break-even year...maybe in 2-5 years? (if ever??) How long many more years will it take to recoup and recover the initial tens of billions of dollars that were CARELESSLY dumped into it? Decades?
To each is their own. If you are satisfied as to what they built and done over the last 10 years so be it but its been underwhelming waste of resources and placements to say the least.They have built quite a bit at WDW over the last 10 years. There isn't much going on right now nor planned for the very near future, but if they match the last 10 years in the next 10 years, that is pretty significant, especially if there is a 25% bump like Len's analysis showed
My family has more fun in all four parks in 2023 than we did in 2013. I guess that’s the only metric I care about. Meanwhile, we had less fun on Wish than Dream and like to cruise with a WDW trip, so we will be spending less with DCL.To each is their own. If you are satisfied as to what they built and done over the last 10 years so be it but it’s been underwhelming waste of resources and placements to say the least.
Sorry, DHS has “halved in size”? That is patently false. Could they have been more efficient in their space utilization? Sure. But there is more guest space in DHS and the under-utilized backlot area is now packed as SWGE and TSL.The issue they had with what they added to WDW over the last 10 years is that parks like Hollywood studios was essentially Halved in size and capacity which they build the new lands.
Behind Thunder Mountain, Encanto and Indy lands wouldn’t have anyway near the same intrusion on day to day operations, so they’re better off start digging now and go at their usual slow pace.
They’re already falling into the same trap they had with Tron. Massive and exciting announcement and then talk about it for years before the building starts.
By the time they open, excitement is gone
Sorry, DHS has “halved in size”? That is patently false. Could they have been more efficient in their space utilization? Sure. But there is more guest space in DHS and the under-utilized backlot area is now packed as SWGE and TSL.
I suspect Dinoland closes once TBA is open.
From the first article (second is behind a paywall),Respectfully, what on earth are you talking about?
I lost very little of my vacation when LMA and the BLT closed, honestly. GMR was a bummer but they actually built MMRR quickly and TSL opened soon after GMR closed.I meant when they were building the lands. OK, maybe not 50% but it massively cut capacity of things to do and it was a half day park for most back then
To each is their own. If you are satisfied as to what they built and done over the last 10 years so be it but its been underwhelming waste of resources and placements to say the least.
And ladders!What we really need is less talking, and more shovels in the ground And sooner, rather than later.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.