lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
Just being different didn’t make it good.Yeah it looked very different which is good, esp being so close to WD on Bay Lake.
Just being different didn’t make it good.Yeah it looked very different which is good, esp being so close to WD on Bay Lake.
I meant it's good that it at least seemed different from the other two lodges at WDWJust being different didn’t make it good.
We’ll always have those memories...I suppose?I doubt we will ever see another effort along the lines of Wilderness Lodge or the Grand Floridian coming from Disney. The time, care, attention to details and craftsmanship are something Disney pre-covid would not pay for, certainly they won't pay for them now. Someday perhaps they will return to quality.
DAKL and WL were the same architect...and paid for by the “awful” Michael Eisner...who we love to punch.Animal Kingdom Lodge is close to the same craftmanship as Wilderness Lodge.
Also its applied in a different way, but the Art of Animation does have a high level of detail, the buildings housing the rooms are concrete boxes, but the pool areas and theming are pretty fantastic as well as the lobby and the art in it. Also there are elements of Pop Century such as the memory boxes in the lobby area which are very detailed.
The Value Resort model of a decorated box is very much the problem as it has been exported to the higher level hotels and even the parks. Hotels like the Lodges and the Grand Floridian were wholly conceived of as a themed experience. They’re form, space, organization and movement through them were all shaped by their story, by competent architects who understood the styles they were emulating to create a strong design. The Value resorts, Grand Floridian Villas, Gran Destino, Riviera and evening many park projects are boxes to be decorated with anything. They’re not distinct forms but boxes to be slathered in ornament. At times they can be highly ornamental but they’re never really detailed as a themed experience one enters.
It’s atrocious...still can’t believe how hideous it is. They’re just seeing how far you’ll let them go...ThEmEd eXpErIeNcE
View attachment 477365
View attachment 477366
Whenever I get back down, I'll have to get more pictures of the hotel. I didn't take much on the last trip. There's a lot more places like those. It's a shame because the surrounding grounds are nice.
Peter Dominick brought new meaning to what an architect should be. Basically, he was to Disney resorts what Joe Rhode is to Animal Kingdom, researching every last detail by visiting the areas over and over again to go so far as to define which materials/patterns were to be used in rooms.
I was not omitting AKL by any means but was simply stating that the Disney we once knew that cared about quality in the resorts is gone (for now). Perhaps this drop in quality is due to them not having him to turn to, but I doubt it. To me it all screams an unwillingness to go the extra mile up front.
and... I disagree with you on the values. They're horrible, all of them. But each to their own.
You have a somewhat romantic idea about what “imagineers” do on that type of bland block. Fast and cheap has been the DVC mandate more and more as time goes on. Squares with chotsky ala Saratoga doesn’t need herb Ryman or John hench to design.Well an imagineer still needed to ensure it looked like the movie and forwarded the story they wanted to tell, what extra details took effort to make the pool area at other resorts, they would have still also had an imagineer think about the story they wanted to tell. Rockwork around the pool at Wilderness Lodge is still a shell, there isn't much to it, but someone still put time and effort into designing it.
Indeed. I toured it twice just before opening. If was and is amazing. Old Mikey was very proud of it.Animal Kingdom Lodge is 19 years old (and change). That isn't at all recent.
Wait while I process that and drink my regrets.
I’ll take more lodges anyday...they are absolutely the finest in Disney hotel designs...not paid for by OLC at least.I meant it's good that it at least seemed different from the other two lodges at WDW
AoA is just basically high priced Allstars...let’s stay sane on this.
That Fantasy Springs “Luxury” hotel looks awful though.I’ll take more lodges anyday...they are absolutely the finest in Disney hotel designs...not paid for by OLC at least.
But I guarantee it won’t be a cheap concrete prefab like the last 5 or so wdw DVC’s not named “kidani”That Fantasy Springs “Luxury” hotel looks awful though.
View attachment 477644
I know the product will be quality. Their attempt to create a Gaudiesque structure in the middle of a fantasyland doesn’t work for me.But I guarantee it won’t be a cheap concrete prefab like the last 5 or so wdw DVC’s not named “kidani”
Disney hasn’t used prefab anything for hotels since Walt Disney World Phase 1 and those buildings remain amazing for their uniformity and precision.But I guarantee it won’t be a cheap concrete prefab like the last 5 or so wdw DVC’s not named “kidani”
I know the product will be quality. Their attempt to create a Gaudiesque structure in the middle of a fantasyland doesn’t work for me.
Sorry...I misspoke...Disney hasn’t used prefab anything for hotels since Walt Disney World Phase 1 and those buildings remain amazing for their uniformity and precision.
All DVC add ons or conversionsRiviera and Destino Tower are the most recent Disney hotels, right? What hotels were built before those? I guess I'm curious of the progression between the lodges that so many love and the most recent two that so many dislike.
Ground breaking for Pop was a couple years before 2001.All DVC add ons or conversions
Last ground breakings prior were pop in 2001 and DAKL/gch in 98
Nope.The official one was in 2001...I was there
There might have been site studies prior
Theres a lot off in your post here.Ok...I checked my dates
I was attached to the front office at Caribbean At the time and they did a dog and pony show in March or so of 2000. I was off by a year.
The 2001 date was already scrapped at that time (2001 was a really bad year at that point), the plan was to open in 2002. Eventually that was pushed to around 1/1/2004?
I think that is the sequence.
It was absolutely not ready by 9/2001...it was a dirtbog and concrete stalls at that point. I believe a pause was put in the construction prior to 9/2001. Again...that was an awful year.
Where were you at this time, exactly?Theres a lot off in your post here.
In June of 2001 they opened reservations for the property for a December opening. They would not have done this if they had already decided a year earlier that the resort would not open in 2001.
They officially announced that the opening would be delayed in October 2001 and that’s when they began canceling reservations that had been booked for the resorts December opening.
The resort was much further along than dirt and concrete stalls by the fall of 2001.
Classic Years sat until eventually opening in December of 2003.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.