Just released...Tell that to Luck, which he produced with his "magic", as it got absolutely shredded by both critics and audiences.
So guess his pulse on the audience has flatlined....
Just released...Tell that to Luck, which he produced with his "magic", as it got absolutely shredded by both critics and audiences.
So guess his pulse on the audience has flatlined....
That is debatable depending on your point of view. Pixar has had 6 releases since his departure, and again depending on your point of view, only 1 of them was considered a "bomb". The other 5 were seen as either critical or audience successes or both.Alright… but no one… and I mean zero people have stepped up to replace what he once was.
So we can agree that everyone at Pixar sucks as much as he does now.
That isn’t helping Pixar.
Maybe this news will bring in Disney+ viewers.
I used to respect John Lasseter, but now I know that he’s a predator, a wuss, a coward, and a loser.Tell that to Luck, which he produced with his "magic", as it got absolutely shredded by both critics and audiences.
So guess his pulse on the audience has flatlined....
Disney needs to reduce costs. Indy at 300 million is ridiculous, break even is 800Thank goodness I didn’t made that thread. Also, let’s just calm down and let Disney try to change strategies to turn things around. After all, they laid off a lot of problematic employees so there’s a chance that Disney will turn things around for the next few years. So, give then some time. And I agree that Warner Bros have more problems than Disney does.
He brought up some great points with the box office numbers…. Where did he go wrong in your opinion?
He brought up some great points with the box office numbers…. Where did he go wrong in your opinion?
Seems like?His math seems to pencil out, and is grounded in reasonable industry sources.
It's not like the movie industry is brand new, it's been around for 100 years. If a film has a budget of $200 Million, it needs to get to $500 Million to break even depending on the domestic/overseas box office mix, etc.
I get it that he seems like a typical Clicky Baity YouTube guy who may not vote for the approved candidate. But math is math.
Seems like?
This means one analyst for one financial services company, in their opinion, thinks that Disney stocks will remain low for the near future.Disney Stock Gets a Downgrade After Analysts Cite These Five Worries ---Barrons
Any economists out there who can explain what this means ?
And their primary concern was the feasibility of ESPN being a standalone streaming service.This means one analyst for one financial services company, in their opinion, thinks that Disney stocks will remain low for the near future.
Meanwhile, a handful of other well-known financial services companies are still recommending a 'buy' since they believe the stock is cheap now and will go up in the long run.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.