flynnibus
Premium Member
You keep saying this - but it doesn't match reality.In order to compromise you first have to have a genuine, good faith disagreement. You also need mutual concessions. One side making concessions in response to a proxy concern isn’t compromise.
Not all negotiations start from a 'good faith disagreement' - Who cares if you call it, you're ing into the wind with this definition of compromise. Compromise is how one finds a way OUT of a disagreement, no matter its origins.
Compromise of 1820 manipulating slavery
Compromise of 1877
or Britian's concessions to Germany in the 30s..
These were not 'good faith disagreements' - you often had one side heavily abusing the other. But we still use the word 'compromise' when talking about how the parties negotiated settlements.
It's about finding a solution both sides agree to, not about who was legitimaltely wronged or not.