News Disney announces strategic restructuring of media and entertainment divisions.

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
It looks like he doesn’t have the background after all, and Chapek continues to put business/salespeople in charge of creative divisions. This never works at entertainment companies.


I suspect it doesn't really matter who is at the top, the overall output of Disney will continue to be sequels, remakes and brand pushing.
 

spock8113

Well-Known Member
"Strategic Restructuring" [strəˈtējik] [rēˈstrək(t)SHəriNG] ADJECTIVE NOUN

1. a reorganization of a company when they are floundering and bleeding millions everyday and want you to think they're ok.

Sounds like an Imagineer term thought up like utlilidors or strategery.
 

tirian

Well-Known Member
"Strategic Restructuring" [strəˈtējik] [rēˈstrək(t)SHəriNG] ADJECTIVE NOUN

1. a reorganization of a company when they are floundering and bleeding millions everyday and want you to think they're ok.

Sounds like an Imagineer term thought up like utlilidors or strategery.
I know you’re kind of joking, but you’re also kind of right about the terminology. ;)
 

tirian

Well-Known Member
Anyone else get the feeling this the beginning of the end of Disney. Not meaning they are going to go bankrupt but it going back to what is was before Covid.

Even though they’re not going out of business, Iger’s strategy of “Buy It and Milk It Dry” doesn’t work anymore.

His version of the Walt Disney Company exploited everything that created its sterling reputation in the first place. For the first time in the company’s history, jokes about how the Mouse steals your wallet and worships the dollar were actually true instead of cynical teases.
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
It looks like he doesn’t have the background after all, and Chapek continues to put business/salespeople in charge of creative divisions. This never works at entertainment companies.

Not sure what in the article you linked would lead you to believe that Kareem Daniel ”doesn’t have the background.“

His business strategy experience will help, as his role is not to manage the creative stuff, it’s to determine the best distribution of the content once it’s been created.
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
I suspect it doesn't really matter who is at the top, the overall output of Disney will continue to be sequels, remakes and brand pushing.
What makes you think this? I mean, obviously Disney does a lot of these, but they’re also doing a lot of new stuff. I think the success of the Mandalorian (which is relatively low budget and a solid win for the company using a huge IP investment) has shown Disney that “this is the way.”
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
"Strategic Restructuring" [strəˈtējik] [rēˈstrək(t)SHəriNG] ADJECTIVE NOUN

1. a reorganization of a company when they are floundering and bleeding millions everyday and want you to think they're ok.

Sounds like an Imagineer term thought up like utlilidors or strategery.
What’s the alternative? Stay the course while the company flounders? Restructuring means they’re investing in trying something different in hopes that they will see a better outcome.
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
What makes you think this? I mean, obviously Disney does a lot of these, but they’re also doing a lot of new stuff. I think the success of the Mandalorian (which is relatively low budget and a solid win for the company using a huge IP investment) has shown Disney that “this is the way.”

To Disney, the success of The Mandalorian means that the assembly line output of franchise content is a good idea. That's why they're working on several other Star Wars shows for Disney+. Disney thinks people want more Star Wars instead of thinking broadly about how people want good quality shows.
 

Jrb1979

Well-Known Member
What’s the alternative? Stay the course while the company flounders? Restructuring means they’re investing in trying something different in hopes that they will see a better outcome.
Maybe work better in investing into the cash cow that is the parks. Instead of delaying or canceling all the projects they did, finish them. Streaming isn't as a big a money maker as they think it is. Too many options out there and when many get it free its hard to make big bucks.
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
I don’t see how streaming will ever make them money. I paid $150 for 3 years. How’s that going to pay Chapeks bonus?

Plus Netflix is willing to fight. And Peacock and Apple TV are in the running now too.

Heck... Apple has the money... they should just buy Disney+.
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
So wait... Disney would rather focus on my $150 for 3 years than focus on my $2,000 per year Annual Pass? (Plus food and lodging).

Chapek doesn’t like passholders but he’s going to focus on Disney+.
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
So wait... Disney would rather focus on my $150 for 3 years than focus on my $2,000 per year Annual Pass? (Plus food and lodging).

Chapek doesn’t like passholders but he’s going to focus on Disney+.
How many potential AP holders do you think there are compared to potential Disney+ subscribers?
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
Maybe work better in investing into the cash cow that is the parks. Instead of delaying or canceling all the projects they did, finish them. Streaming isn't as a big a money maker as they think it is. Too many options out there and when many get it free its hard to make big bucks.
The parks aren’t exactly a cash cow right now, are they? And streaming isn’t a big money maker?
 

Jrb1979

Well-Known Member
The parks aren’t exactly a cash cow right now, are they? And streaming isn’t a big money maker?
Right now they aren't a cash cow but doesn't mean they won't be again. Streaming is a big money maker when you add all the services together but individually they aren't. Look at how many give trials away for free or allow sharing of accounts. Like I said with so many options its hard to stand out.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom