Dinosaur conversion to Indiana Jones

[wm49rs]

aye but they all look a little silly now. It was on purpose from me. After the first thread I came to on this site where a guy was ripped by the so called experts only to be proven right I thought It would be a giggle to get the experts in a tizz again. Sure as eggs are eggs out came the pomposity as they all engaged in a p1$$ing contest. Now they all looklike mugs TBH.

Easy:sohappy:

Save for the fact all that was proven was the Indy ride and Dinosaur are essentially the same, in terms of their track. Not that they're ever going to change out one for the other....

Anything else you've looked to prattle on about is mere opinion and your own pomposity. But, if that's what gets you trolls through the day.....

 

[David Roberts]

Isn't there an Indy rollercoaster at Disneyland Paris? If I'm correct it seemed like a pretty basic ride. If you added a little to it and put that in one of the other lands in DAK I think it would make that park that much better. DAK needs something, and I need more Indy..perfect fit

 

[imagineer boy]

Isn't there an Indy rollercoaster at Disneyland Paris? If I'm correct it seemed like a pretty basic ride. If you added a little to it and put that in one of the other lands in DAK I think it would make that park that much better. DAK needs something, and I need more Indy..perfect fit

The ride at DLP other than the archeology theme has nothing to do with Indy. And Indy really doesn't fit the theme of AK.

 

[Conrad]

Save for the fact all that was proven was the Indy ride and Dinosaur are essentially the same, in terms of their track. Not that they're ever going to change out one for the other....

Anything else you've looked to prattle on about is mere opinion and your own pomposity. But, if that's what gets you trolls through the day.....

Since you seemed tomiss the point I will make it again.

I am not, was not and never will be @rsed if they are the same. I was on the wind up with something that I knew certain people wouldnt be able to help theselves diving into to critisise.

 

[wm49rs]

Since you seemed tomiss the point I will make it again.

I am not, was not and never will be @rsed if they are the same. I was on the wind up with something that I knew certain people wouldnt be able to help theselves diving into to critisise.

So all you were trying to do is purposely aggravate people? Nothing more?

 

[lebeau]

What a brilliant plot.

1. Say a bunch of stupid things.

2. When people point out the flaws in your argument, say more vague, stupid things.

3. When it finally becomes clear that the original idea was beyond ridiculous, claim you knew it all along and just wanted to get people worked up.

He was...

Brilliant!

I'll say this, for a troll, you've been entertaining.

:lol:

 

[Conrad]

So all you were trying to do is purposely aggravate people? Nothing more?

not quite.

I found it quite distastefull in the other thread where there seems to be a clique of know alls ready to pounce on anyone who says anything that might be speculation. If it ok for them to demean and ridicule others I thought it ok that I join in just in a way that ridicules them. Just a bit of harmless fun and richly deserved.

 

[lebeau]

not quite.

I found it quite distastefull in the other thread where there seems to be a clique of know alls ready to pounce on anyone who says anything that might be speculation. If it ok for them to demean and ridicule others I thought it ok that I join in just in a way that ridicules them. Just a bit of harmless fun and richly deserved.

Yes, I'm so embarassed....

You don't look silly at all.

Maybe next time you could actually contribute to the thread that so offended you rather than concocting some elaborate plan that makes you look like you don't know what you're talking about. Cause I gotta be honest with you, I'm not really buying the dumb act after the fact.

 

[wm49rs]

not quite.

I found it quite distastefull in the other thread where there seems to be a clique of know alls ready to pounce on anyone who says anything that might be speculation. If it ok for them to demean and ridicule others I thought it ok that I join in just in a way that ridicules them. Just a bit of harmless fun and richly deserved.

Well that was another thread. This one has been nothing but respectful to the OP and his question, which was answered more than adequately by some of the same "insiders." All you've done is come in and throw in some smarmy BS about a change that is not, nor will not, ever happen, and call it amusement. You're the reason threads get locked down. You want to participate, fine. But don't come from the angle of looking to do nothing more than aggravate people for your own personal amusement. If you think you can accomplish that, you may actually rise to something more than a poncey little troll. But I doubt it.....

 

[lebeau]

Well that was another thread. This one has been nothing but respectful to the OP and his question, which was answered more than adequately by some of the same "insiders." All you've done is come in and throw in some smarmy BS about a change that is not, nor will not, ever happen, and call it amusement. You're the reason threads get locked down. You want to participate, fine. But don't come from the angle of looking to do nothing more than aggravate people for your own personal amusement. If you think you can accomplish that, you may actually rise to something more than a poncey little troll. But I doubt it.....

Well said.

But come on, we both know the guy is just trying to save face now.

 

[Conrad]

Well that was another thread. This one has been nothing but respectful to the OP and his question, which was answered more than adequately by some of the same "insiders." All you've done is come in and throw in some smarmy BS about a change that is not, nor will not, ever happen, and call it amusement. You're the reason threads get locked down. You want to participate, fine. But don't come from the angle of looking to do nothing more than aggravate people for your own personal amusement. If you think you can accomplish that, you may actually rise to something more than a poncey little troll. But I doubt it.....

To be fair I would rather be a poncy little troll than to have so little in my life I have to play the billy big @rse on an internet board and make myself feel big by ridiculing others. That was kinda my point.

 

[Conrad]

Yes, I'm so embarassed....

You don't look silly at all.

Maybe next time you could actually contribute to the thread that so offended you rather than concocting some elaborate plan that makes you look like you don't know what you're talking about. Cause I gotta be honest with you, I'm not really buying the dumb act after the fact.

~Couldnt give a stuff if you buy it or not. Thats what I did. If you doubt me look at the other thread that I was on about.

 

[Conrad]

. You're the reason threads get locked down. .....

Feel free to find so much as a single solitary thread that has been closed because of me

 

[wm49rs]

To be fair I would rather be a poncy little troll than to have so little in my life I have to play the billy big @rse on an internet board and make myself feel big by ridiculing others. That was kinda my point.

And yet you just came off as both in this thread. Learn to pick your timing a little better in the future........

But at least you admitted to being nothing that a bothersome troll. Good for all to know.....

 

[Conrad]

And yet you just came off as both in this thread. Learn to pick your timing a little better in the future........

But at least you admitted to being nothing that a bothersome troll. Good for all to know.....

maybe so but You and I know I could stroll up and do exactly the same in another thread and still get the bites because some people just cant resist trying to make out that they are better than everyone else.

To be fair, If I was selling hotdogs to tourists all day, I too would be on message boards pretending to be a high ranking Disney insider

 

[wm49rs]

maybe so but You and I know I could stroll up and do exactly the same in another thread and still get the bites because some people just cant resist trying to make out that they are better than everyone else.

Too bad no one did that here. Again, carrying a fight over from another thread (where a number of posts were deleted, many of them yours) to this one for nothing more than your own amusement is pathetic. The OP asked a question, and it was answered, politely and with a good deal of detail from those same "insiders" you decry. Anything else from you is self-serving prattle.....

 

[Conrad]

Too bad no one did that here. Again, carrying a fight over from another thread (where a number of posts were deleted, many of them yours) to this one for nothing more than your own amusement is pathetic. The OP asked a question, and it was answered, politely and with a good deal of detail from those same "insiders" you decry. Anything else from you is self-serving prattle.....

oh, I see.

So the rules are that the insiders decide when a thread can degenerate into slating someone? So in the last thread that was ok because a so called insider did it. However when I do it in this thread, its not ok? Gotcha

 

[wm49rs]

oh, I see.

So the rules are that the insiders decide when a thread can degenerate into slating someone? So in the last thread that was ok because a so called insider did it. However when I do it in this thread, its not ok? Gotcha

I'm not sure what your comprehension defunct is, but this is a separate thread altogether. No one has been insulting towards the OP or anyone else here, except for starting with you. And in case you've forgotten, the Mods cleaned up that other thread (including many a post by you). Or did you decide to ignore that fact as well?

 

[lebeau]

~Couldnt give a stuff if you buy it or not. Thats what I did. If you doubt me look at the other thread that I was on about.

I gotta ask. Are you actually English or are you just cribbing lines from Spike on Buffy the Vampire Slayer?

I see two possibilities. Either

1. You really are a Disney novice and now you're trying to save face for your ignorance.

or

2. You're a really big troll who didn't think out your plan very well.

You're claiming it's #2, but I think #1 is more likely. And frankly, you come off better under #1 as well. Situation #2 is just so sad.

Really, neither profile is especially flattering.

I'll tell you what, if you find the company here so objectionable why don't you go post on one of the hundreds of other Disney forums out there?

So long, chap? :wave:

 

[David Roberts]

The ride at DLP other than the archeology theme has nothing to do with Indy. And Indy really doesn't fit the theme of AK.

Thats why I said they could add more to it, and I don't see how it wouldn't easily fit into AK considering the movies always took place in jungles much like what is found in AK.