VJ
Well-Known Member
no ideaAny clue as to why he said that?
no ideaAny clue as to why he said that?
Gringotts with a tamer queue sounds more correct, I'll agree with that.I think expecting GotG to be comparable to Hagrids is unrealistic. A Gringotts that doesn’t stop with a more lackluster queue - also seems fair.
Well, I disagree... They've hit the nail on the head with a lot of their recent additions. Hagrid's and the new stunt show included.They will always be sub par to disney.
Coasters are my thing if they are thematic. Hagrid's, Everest, Rockin' Roller Coaster, Thunder Mountain, Space Mountain... Over at Dollywood, the firetruck coaster and the sawmill coaster ring bells too.Just come out and say coasters aren’t really my thing.
Masterfully integrated? It’s a giant exposed roller coaster that almost goes through HP world. It’s a good coaster but I wouldn’t say it’s well integrated.
Wouldn’t call that masterfully integrated.It's a rollercoaster that isn't trying to be something it isn't. The theming of the rollercoaster is that it IS a rollercoaster, just put among raptors
You will probably be disappointed. Velocicoaster kicks serious posterior. It is objectively one of the best coasters in the world and is easily one of the two best coasters in Central Florida, right next to Hagrid’s.Let’s not go comparing generic outdoor coasters with a couple of Dino statues to a giant indoor omnimover coaster with a reverse launch and potentially a lot more thematic elements both in queue and in ride (hopefully) unlike velocicoaster.
I sincerely hope this coaster is better than velocicoaster.
That’s the part I don’t understand, there is a limit to the amount of times I want to do non interactive dark rides a day, any more after 2ish times in a day and it’s just not going to thrill me.Generic coasters are just boring to me, I've ridden them so many times that "new" roller coasters with no theming have nothing to offer for me.
That’s the part I don’t understand, there is a limit to the amount of times I want to do non interactive dark rides a day, any more after 2ish times in a day and it’s just not going to thrill me.
For $450 mil it better be! At that cost it should knock my socks off and buy me a new pair! 6x the cost of RnRC.It will…obviously…be better than RnRC.
How is this a discussion?
I think it will be a great ride.For $450 mil it better be! But the real question is it 6 times as good as RnRC, adjusting for inflation.
For $450 mil it better be! At that cost it should knock my socks off and buy me a new pair! 6x the cost of RnRC.
Sure - and honestly I think that's a reasonable opinion from the guest-facing perspective. If an attraction is sufficiently entertaining, the money is generally the furthest thing from your mind as you ride it.Quite frankly, I never think about or care what a budget is. If it’s a good attraction it’s a good attraction.
And I am sure this will be an absolute blast.
Sure - and honestly I think that's a reasonable opinion from the guest-facing perspective. If an attraction is sufficiently entertaining, the money is generally the furthest thing from your mind as you ride it.
That said, if you found out Dumbo somehow cost more than Rise of the Resistance, I think it would also be reasonable to deduce that there's something screwy in the process by which these things are made.
Add to it that we as guests are increasingly being asked to foot the bill for these expensive endeavors, and the returns seem (in many cases) to be diminishing . . . it's fair to suggest that Guardians being one of the most expensive attractions of all time *should* mean that it's MASSIVELY entertaining. Like, next level. But will it?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.