LSLS
Well-Known Member
LOL, ok....
Of course it's not threat. It's mainly due to the fact that the group Disney caters to is not interested in Universal. Those with kids under 36 inches and those who bring their entire family to Disney who can't ride the rides Universal has. That's a big group.This is for all the people who don't latch onto the whispers of an echo chamber as truth, and who aren't ready to believe the worst out of aggrieved schadenfreude, and who question sources and want facts:
Epic Universe is not a threat to WDW
Yeah, there are people who *believe* it. But there are people who *believe* the earth is flat. And repeating a belief over and over again is not the same as reality.
Don't get me wrong. I think EU will be great (hopefully, we don't want another F&F). It will be great for Universal, and it will be great for Disney.
But it doesn't have the ability to make a dent in WDW overall attendance, and most importantly for Disney execs: It won't make a significant dent in its profits. And the dent will be smoothed out in just a few years. WDW will still make billions of dollars each year.
EU is a park with 11 rides. You know what WDW fans call WDW parks with that many rides? "A half-day park." Will it give Universal guests an extra day in their parks and hotels? Yes... A day.
"But it will take away a day from WDW!!" Sure. Or, it will take away a day from Islands of Adventure or Universal Studios or SeaWorld.
Disney has been raising prices to reduce attendance to avoid overcrowding. It didn't work. They still haven't found the tipping point that will drive away guests. And so, the Park Reservation System established during pandemic distancing protocols is staying around. And how do I know this? Because two CEOs have said as much during quarterly business calls, during which, misleading their investors can result in huge fines and/or jail. But you know, the *believers* still believe they lie.
The *believes* say that Disney execs are "shaking in their boots!" Oh, really. And they know that... how? They don't. They have no inside contacts to the C Suite. Someone *presumes* they surely must be shaking in their boots and the echo chamber takes that as the gospel truth and repeats it over and over again... without any evidence.
In fact, our insiders here tell us Disney isn't worried. But the believers scoff at that because... because of what? They have no inside information to counter with. They're just presuming they're right because the echo chamber keeps saying it.
I know this little rant won't change the minds of the believers. But for all you rational folk out there, keep in mind that they don't have the facts to back them up.
Strategic yes, but there are lots of complicated reasons behind these announcement decisions, all the way through to the current business climate and the economy. Even something as simple as announcing a data for Tron, can disrupt bookings. If business is good today, and demand is exceptionally high, there's no need to announce anything just yet.
Additionally the cost to borrow money right now is high, and while they have abated a bit, recession fears and supply chain issues still persist. Disney typically won't want to announce new attractions until they are ready to turn on the money (and usually even after that). It makes sense that they are not ready to turn on the money right now.
I don't know if this is necessarily true and it might even be a dangerous place for fan thinking to go. We've sort of been here a couple times before: people thinking that IOA was going to sink WDW and that Potter was going to force their hand, and netiher of those instances really played out the way people thought they would. Epic Universe could be a great thing for Universal, but make almost no noticeable impact on WDW.
Although I support one could argue that the doubling down on IP in the parks might be somewhat related to that. Maybe.
But all indications are that WDW wants to pare down attendance and stop pushing so many people through. There definitely won't be a fifth park anytime soon, and it's doubtful they will want to make any commitment on attractions to drive attendance until attendance has significantly decreased (of their own accord).
Please, do try to remember that there are multiple definitions of theme park fans. Yes some of them just want more attractions and environments and yet some of them are simply content with character meet and greets and IP content. Not everyone was disappointed and the key for Disney to keep making profits, is to keep the majority of people happy and coming back, even if that spurns the people on the edges.
Some of us are just super excited about Porto's being announced for Downtown Disney for the simple reason that maybe the lines in Buena Park will go down... maybe.
This is for all the people who don't latch onto the whispers of an echo chamber as truth, and who aren't ready to believe the worst out of aggrieved schadenfreude, and who question sources and want facts:
Epic Universe is not a threat to WDW
Yeah, there are people who *believe* it. But there are people who *believe* the earth is flat. And repeating a belief over and over again is not the same as reality.
Don't get me wrong. I think EU will be great (hopefully, we don't want another F&F). It will be great for Universal, and it will be great for Disney.
But it doesn't have the ability to make a dent in WDW overall attendance, and most importantly for Disney execs: It won't make a significant dent in its profits. And the dent will be smoothed out in just a few years. WDW will still make billions of dollars each year.
EU is a park with 11 rides. You know what WDW fans call WDW parks with that many rides? "A half-day park." Will it give Universal guests an extra day in their parks and hotels? Yes... A day.
"But it will take away a day from WDW!!" Sure. Or, it will take away a day from Islands of Adventure or Universal Studios or SeaWorld.
Disney has been raising prices to reduce attendance to avoid overcrowding. It didn't work. They still haven't found the tipping point that will drive away guests. And so, the Park Reservation System established during pandemic distancing protocols is staying around. And how do I know this? Because two CEOs have said as much during quarterly business calls, during which, misleading their investors can result in huge fines and/or jail. But you know, the *believers* still believe they lie.
The *believers* say that Disney execs are "shaking in their boots!" Oh, really. And they know that... how? They don't. They have no inside contacts to the C Suite. Someone *presumes* they surely must be shaking in their boots and the echo chamber takes that as the gospel truth and repeats it over and over again... without any evidence.
In fact, our insiders here tell us Disney isn't worried. But the believers scoff at that because... because of what? They have no inside information to counter with. They're just presuming they're right because the echo chamber keeps saying it.
I know this little rant won't change the minds of the believers. But for all you rational folk out there, keep in mind that they don't have the facts to back them up.
But the resorts and restaurants at WDW are full, meaning there are people who want to go but can't.I will say, I don't think it's a threat to take over Disney as the top place in the world, but I do think it could sway some folks to change plans. Not by itself, but for the people who think Potter looks cool, but doesn't think that is enough to justify spending almost the same money to go to Universal over Disney, this could push them over.
Now, from what you and others with knowledge say, they don't think that number will be nearly enough to justify a response. I have 0 reason to question what everyone is saying (just because I of course believe companies respond to others doesn't mean I think that always happens, or that WDW ever does). I do wonder if there is a number where there would be concern, or if they aren't even following Universal. I will say, 11 rides seems small, but it also does depend on what else they have. Are there other things like Meet and greets, shows, etc. If they have those things, the number of rides pretty much lines up with everything other than MK.
Everything said, I did think we would get a lot more from D23. Another crazy conspiracy, did they intentionally completely slight WDW just as a show of "Universal means so little to us, we will show absolutely NOTHING to combat." I doubt it, but no idea.
This is for all the people who don't latch onto the whispers of an echo chamber as truth, and who aren't ready to believe the worst out of aggrieved schadenfreude, and who question sources and want facts:
Epic Universe is not a threat to WDW
Yeah, there are people who *believe* it. But there are people who *believe* the earth is flat. And repeating a belief over and over again is not the same as reality.
Don't get me wrong. I think EU will be great (hopefully, we don't want another F&F). It will be great for Universal, and it will be great for Disney.
But it doesn't have the ability to make a dent in WDW overall attendance, and most importantly for Disney execs: It won't make a significant dent in its profits. And the dent will be smoothed out in just a few years. WDW will still make billions of dollars each year.
EU is a park with 11 rides. You know what WDW fans call WDW parks with that many rides? "A half-day park." Will it give Universal guests an extra day in their parks and hotels? Yes... A day.
"But it will take away a day from WDW!!" Sure. Or, it will take away a day from Islands of Adventure or Universal Studios or SeaWorld.
Disney has been raising prices to reduce attendance to avoid overcrowding. It didn't work. They still haven't found the tipping point that will drive away guests. And so, the Park Reservation System established during pandemic distancing protocols is staying around. And how do I know this? Because two CEOs have said as much during quarterly business calls, during which, misleading their investors can result in huge fines and/or jail. But you know, the *believers* still believe they lie.
The *believers* say that Disney execs are "shaking in their boots!" Oh, really. And they know that... how? They don't. They have no inside contacts to the C Suite. Someone *presumes* they surely must be shaking in their boots and the echo chamber takes that as the gospel truth and repeats it over and over again... without any evidence.
In fact, our insiders here tell us Disney isn't worried. But the believers scoff at that because... because of what? They have no inside information to counter with. They're just presuming they're right because the echo chamber keeps saying it.
I know this little rant won't change the minds of the believers. But for all you rational folk out there, keep in mind that they don't have the facts to back them up.
Yup. I think the prime example is DVC. People love Disney with all their heart and soul. Universal is like SeaWorld and Busch Gardens, it's entertainment, it's not a lifestyle.But the resorts and restaurants at WDW are full, meaning there are people who want to go but can't.
If Joe decides to cancel his Disney trip and go to Universal instead, that means Stacy (who had been previously unable to book because everything was sold out) can take his place. Stacy's money is just as green as Joe's money, so Disney is no worse off.
I don't think anyone really thinks epic u is a threat to Disney. At least not in the short term. Nintendo is the X factor in all this. It alone could pull a day from Disney. My son, age 13, said he would rather do EU to see Nintendo rather than animal kingdom or the studios. I can't believe he's the only one.But it doesn't have the ability to make a dent in WDW overall attendance, and most importantly for Disney execs: It won't make a significant dent in its profits. And the dent will be smoothed out in just a few years. WDW will still make billions of dollars each year.
Well 11 rides would beat out half the WDW parks and tie Epcot. So that would make it more than a half day park by this boards standards. The only 2 parks that are called half day are studios and animal.EU is a park with 11 rides. You know what WDW fans call WDW parks with that many rides? "A half-day park." Will it give Universal guests an extra day in their parks and hotels? Yes... A day.
True, it's very possible that Disney sees no decline for that reason. I honestly have no idea. All I know is the visitor numbers in 2025-2026 could be really fun to watch.But the resorts and restaurants at WDW are full, meaning there are people who want to go but can't.
If Joe decides to cancel his Disney trip and go to Universal instead, that means Stacy (who had been previously unable to book because everything was sold out) can take his place. Stacy's money is just as green as Joe's money, so Disney is no worse off.
Most 13 year old boys would already rather go to Universal than Disney. They don't need Nintendo for that, and they didn't need Potter for that. Disney has never been cool, isn't cool now, and will never be cool.I don't think anyone really thinks epic u is a threat to Disney. At least not in the short term. Nintendo is the X factor in all this. It alone could pull a day from Disney. My son, age 13, said he would rather do EU to see Nintendo rather than animal kingdom or the studios. I can't believe he's the only one.
That’s because they need some REAL, Jersey cement guys down there…trust me, THEY know how to pour cement quickly…Was there this week. The ride may be running (we saw the cycles go a few times while on People Mover), but they definitely still have a solid amount of work to do around the outside to make it work for flow. Ton of concrete looks like it needs laid still.
Agreed. Disney does well with families that have little kids or those families that bring the older generation. They have rides the whole family can enjoy together. That's where Disney excells. Epic Universe isn't going to change that. IMO the impact is going to be felt in the families with teens and older. Adding Epic Universe those families might opt for Universal for 5 days and Disney for 1-2 days.Most 13 year old boys would already rather go to Universal than Disney. They don't need Nintendo for that, and they didn't need Potter for that. Disney has never been cool, isn't cool now, and will never be cool.
I think it depends on when they first went. If they went to WDW as a kid, then as a Teen, WDW has some cache. Yes, Uni is way cooler for teens/adults, but so is Busch Gardens. Nostalgia and details are what separates WDW from the others.Most 13 year old boys would already rather go to Universal than Disney. They don't need Nintendo for that, and they didn't need Potter for that. Disney has never been cool, isn't cool now, and will never be cool.
Agreed. As a 13 year old I would’ve chosen Disney over Universal.I think it depends on when they first went. If they went to WDW as a kid, then as a Teen, WDW has some cache. Yes, Uni is way cooler for teens/adults, but so is Busch Gardens. Nostalgia and details are what separates WDW from the others.
Cachet*I think it depends on when they first went. If they went to WDW as a kid, then as a Teen, WDW has some cache. Yes, Uni is way cooler for teens/adults, but so is Busch Gardens. Nostalgia and details are what separates WDW from the others.
I think I've made that mistake a zillion times on here. Thank you.Cachet*
I think the normal trajectory is: Loves Disney as a child... gets "too cool" for Disney as a teenager... comes to re-appreciate Disney as an adult.
*I'm so sorry... pet peeve.
In terms of no expansion announcements, you have to remember the current plan is "less people, who spend more." This does not require expansion to achieve.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.