Creations Shop opening this summer

G00fyDad

Well-Known Member
Yes, buy Bell, Buy Exxon, Buy GM, Buy Kodak, Buy Kraft. The way to that better future was through consumerism.
My dream EPCOT has a Pavillion on Evolution. One of the Beginning of the Universe. One on Comparative Religions and the Power of Myth. One on Art History. Break the bonds of sponsorship and commercialism and stick to true ideals and knowledge. I don't expect it to happen, but it has a better chance through IP than past models.
R.jpg
 

Inspired Figment

Well-Known Member
Yes, buy Bell, Buy Exxon, Buy GM, Buy Kodak, Buy Kraft. The way to that better future was through consumerism.
My dream EPCOT has a Pavillion on Evolution. One of the Beginning of the Universe. One on Comparative Religions and the Power of Myth. One on Art History. Break the bonds of sponsorship and commercialism and stick to true ideals and knowledge. I don't expect it to happen, but it has a better chance through IP than past models.
Except Spaceship Earth basically covered most of that through how Communication evolved. despite it being sponsored by AT&T and everyone else. Hence why it was a mission statement attraction of what you’d experience in the rest of the park.

Plus, the way the attraction’s were executed were not to be extremely blatant with the advertising. You may have gotten hints of it simply due to the fact they dealt with those very subjects. But it wasn’t the mission statement nor was it what you mainly got from those attractions. It was the subjects that were at the forefront, not the companies sponsoring it

i also say, you could cover some of the various religions of the various countries through the World Showcase. One big one being the Israel pavilion that was supposed to be built, which would’ve gone over their beliefs aswell as the countries cultural achievements & history.

There are many ways EPCOT could have new pavilions and attractions to better celebrate mankind’s achievements and culture. Constantly using Film IP rides that make little effort to tie into real world culture & subjects isn’t one of them
 
Last edited:

sedati

Well-Known Member
Here's the problem with that - not only is that not really true of the original EPCOT Center (Journey Into Imagination as it was in 83 could run today as a crowd-pleaser with only minimal updates), but there are also two more levels on which that doesn't pass.

1) Parks need updates no matter what. The Magic Kingdom is the most visited park in the world and is constantly being updated, even if not always in the ways we want or as often as we like. Disney still spends millions every year updating all of their parks, and EPCOT isn't unique in that regard.

2) Rocket to the Moon wasn't outdated because we all go to the Moon so often. It was outdated because the presentation felt stale. That update had nothing to do with the "ever-changing future" because we STILL haven't caught up to it. It was the execution that was failing, not the concept. Disney has *barely* touched Space Mountain since 1975 and it's the most popular thing in Tomorrowland by miles. Because the Space Mountain concept isn't one that we can "catch up" to - it riffs on Space Travel to such an extent that one day when the real thing becomes casually accessible Space Mountain will still be unique from it. And we're really not close to catching up anyway.

That has always been true of the attractions that worked best in both Tomorrowland and Future World - that they dabble in futuristic subjects doesn't automatically set them racing towards an expiration date. Not any more than any other attraction. If the core of what you're doing is both fun and far-flung enough that reality won't catch up you can still inspire guests with notions of the future without it becoming "Today-land". They've just got to act on some sort of wish-fulfilment for the guest that is tangential to the subject at hand.

They could do it - they HAVE done it - but instead they now chose not to.
Imagination, I heartily agree.

1) I think you confuse maintenance and updates. EPCOT would need both. Pirates needs expensive maintenance to keep it mostly the same. Now imagine not only needing to keep it going, but now make it cowboys instead.

2) EPCOT relied on slow-moving diorama attractions. What about that is easy to update when found stale? I don't know if the argument of the timelessness of coasters in the dark is the best here.

3) Yes, the attractions only dabbled in futuristic subjects, but what of the park/land itself? Spaceship Earth and Space Mountain seem eternal, but the rest is just bland beyond what paint can really fix. As for wish fulfillment, Mission Space does it for me- I went up in a rocket instead of just watching a clip of one (see SE, UoE, H.) Who doesn't want to explore the Galaxy with the Guardians? See how far we'll go with Moana? Learn about the Seas with Mr. Ray? Tour Scandanavia with Anna and Elsa? (I do find the execution somewhat less than fulfilling, but the concept isn't as flawed as some make it out to be.)
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
Who doesn't want to explore the Galaxy with the Guardians? See how far we'll go with Moana? Learn about the Seas with Mr. Ray? Tour Scandanavia with Anna and Elsa? (I do find the execution somewhat less than fulfilling, but the concept isn't as flawed as some make it out to be.)

I think this is much harder to pull off than you're insinuating. For the people that loved original EPCOT and its attractions, it's hard to imagine an IP ride coming close to offering the same experience. The very nature of having IP means they're going to want to showcase it; a Guardians ride about space is going to focus on the Guardians themselves to some extent.

And on the other side, if there's too much focus on learning, science, whatever in an IP ride, it will just annoy or even anger the people who are solely interested in the IP. If Frozen Ever After was a ride that's actually about Norway just with Anna and Elsa as tour guides, there would be a huge number of guests unhappy that the Frozen ride wasn't actually about Frozen.

That doesn't mean they couldn't pull it off, just that there's a very fine line to walk between those opposing viewpoints. Some are easier than others, of course -- learning about the ocean with Mr. Ray would be pretty easy to pull off without even deviating from what people seeking the IP would expect.
 
Last edited:

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
Imagination, I heartily agree.

1) I think you confuse maintenance and updates. EPCOT would need both. Pirates needs expensive maintenance to keep it mostly the same. Now imagine not only needing to keep it going, but now make it cowboys instead.

2) EPCOT relied on slow-moving diorama attractions. What about that is easy to update when found stale? I don't know if the argument of the timelessness of coasters in the dark is the best here.

3) Yes, the attractions only dabbled in futuristic subjects, but what of the park/land itself? Spaceship Earth and Space Mountain seem eternal, but the rest is just bland beyond what paint can really fix. As for wish fulfillment, Mission Space does it for me- I went up in a rocket instead of just watching a clip of one (see SE, UoE, H.) Who doesn't want to explore the Galaxy with the Guardians? See how far we'll go with Moana? Learn about the Seas with Mr. Ray? Tour Scandanavia with Anna and Elsa? (I do find the execution somewhat less than fulfilling, but the concept isn't as flawed as some make it out to be.)
I'm not at all confusing maintenance and updates. In the last decade alone every Disney park has recieved significant, expensive updates. That is on top of the regular maintenance, which is more or less regular depending on which park you're visiting.

I never said "slow-moving diorama attractions" were easy to update - but keep in mind that in the last 30 years Disney has spent real cash on upgrading and updating even the MOST perennially popular attractions around the world, often more than once - Every Pirates, every Mansion, Spaceship Earth, many Fantasyland Dark Rides, several Tower of Terrors, not to mention entire lands that have been replaced . . . it's part of the life-cycle of a theme park. The need for that wasn't unique to EPCOT.

The myth that guests didn't like the Future World Dark Rides because "the future caught up with them" is just that - recall that most of those attractions spent 80% of their scenes showcasing the history of their subject, anyway. They only got to the Future parts at the end. Their "failure" is much more myth than it was reality. People cite short lines as an indicator of their unpopularity, but these attractions were designed as people-eaters, and eat people they did. EPCOT actually peaked in terms of popularity AND profitability in the early 90's.

Unfortunately, 90's Disney management wanted to get out of the large, expensive, Audio Animatronics extravaganza game in favor of Thrill Rides that were cheaper to maintain. It wasn't because guests were demanding Horizons be razed for a Simulator. It was because Disney knew the simulator would be cheaper in the long run and hoped guests would go for it. The Future World Dark Rides left us because of financial greed. So they mowed down most of them and set up less dramatic replacements, and look - the park has bottomed out in terms of popularity and profitability, only being propped up with foodie festivals and needing a hugely expensive near-top-down relaunch. The bait and switch didn't work.

Now Spaceship Earth continues to get an update every 10-15 years that lightly refreshes the ascent and makes bigger changes to the descent, and no one bats an eye because that's just something that's done to keep most long-running attractions feeling fresh. I'm not saying that all of the OG Future World attractions should still be with us in 2021, but many of them could have easily connected with an audience without being taken down to the studs. But, as with The Great Movie Ride, it seemed cheaper to start from scratch, so they never tried. And now they're paying for it anyway.
 

HauntedPirate

Park nostalgist
Premium Member
IIRC, the original FW attractions were designed to be updated. The Imagineers knew what they were building would eventually need to be refreshed and built them accordingly. It’s almost as if they knew what they were doing.

At least I won’t use the laughing emoji on a serious post for no reason, because that would probably get someone banned.
 

Sir_Cliff

Well-Known Member
Fairs continue to do just fine. There’s a big one opening later this year. The US even rejoined the BIE a few years ago.
I don't think I am being too controversial in arguing that the cultural and political relevance that international expositions/world's fairs enjoyed beginning around mid- to late-nineteenth century was already fading by the early 1980s. They're still held around the world and I guess must be viable, but, for example, I doubt many of us outside of Dubai will ever hear anything about that exposition nor would many people out there have the foggiest idea what a world's fair looks like in the 21st century. I wouldn't be surprised if a sizeable chunk of WDW guests today don't know what a world's fair even is, and for younger guests I would venture a significant majority wouldn't know.

In short, I don't know the trajectory of actual world's fairs supports the argument that a "permanent world's fair" is a timeless concept. That doesn't mean I like what they are doing, but I also think people can idealise the enduring appeal of the original EPCOT Center a little too much.
 

Communicora

Premium Member
I don't think I am being too controversial in arguing that the cultural and political relevance that international expositions/world's fairs enjoyed beginning around mid- to late-nineteenth century began to fade away significantly during the 1980s. They're still held around the world and I guess must be viable, but, for example, I doubt many of us outside of Dubai will ever hear anything about that exposition nor would many people out there have the foggiest idea what a world's fair looks like in the 21st century. I wouldn't be surprised if a sizeable chunk of WDW guests today don't know what a world's fair even is, and for younger guests I would venture a significant majority wouldn't know.
Minneapolis/St. Paul and Houston are both in the mix for future world's fairs and I'm looking forward to attending the 2025 fair in Osaka. I'm sure it will be as fun as they one I attended in 2005 in Aichi.
 

Sir_Cliff

Well-Known Member
Minneapolis/St. Paul and Houston are both in the mix for future world's fairs and I'm looking forward to attending the 2025 fair in Osaka. I'm sure it will be as fun as they one I attended in 2005 in Aichi.
Looking at the website you linked to, though, I would note that the last one held in the English-speaking world was Brisbane, Australia in 1988. That doesn't mean there is no market for them anywhere in the world, but it may not be the same market to which WDW is mostly catering.

I guess we'll see what happens with future US bids. Maybe I'm wrong and people and it's some kind of market or bureaucratic failure that they disappeared from North America and suddenly people will be clamouring to go to the Minneapolis/St. Paul world's fair in a few years while Bob Chapek fumes.
 
Last edited:

Communicora

Premium Member
Looking at the website you linked to, though, I would note that the last one held in the English-speaking world was Brisbane, Australia in 1988. That doesn't mean there is no market for them anywhere in the world, but it may not be the same market to which WDW is mostly catering.

I guess we'll see what happens with future US bids. Maybe I'm wrong and people and it's some kind of market or bureaucratic failure that they disappeared from North America and suddenly people will be clamouring to go to the Minneapolis/St. Paul world's fair in a few years while Bob Chapek fumes, unable to accept his massive error.
Oh, I don't expect Disney or its typical visitors to pay them much attention. I just have to stand up for my beloved world's fairs while I quietly bemoan how much Epcot has changed. Cheers!
 

mightynine

Well-Known Member
Da Zack Attack said:
These will serve as some of our first completed elements in the new World Celebration neighborhood (boldly announced in the blue of our new popcorn kiosk).

I honestly can’t believe this sentence made it through the PR vortex.

Nothing boldly announces a neighborhood like the color of a popcorn kiosk! Poor trash cans just get left out.
 

Inspired Figment

Well-Known Member
A shop named “Creations” is okay and different in a good way. A store named “Creations Shop” is awful.
And even worse than that… a shop named “Creations”/“Creations Shop” that does to little to nothing to evoke or truly theme or tie it into the topic of creation, creativity, or EPCOT’s creations for that matter (considering it’s supposed to be the main store for the park) is just nonsensical & pointless.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom