Coronavirus and Walt Disney World general discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jwink

Well-Known Member
I just looked it up, you’re correct on the $275.
If WDW employees are furloughed or laid off, many will actually be bringing home more than if they were working.

What a genius bill. 🙄
Well I think you only get $275 if you make over a certain amount so a lot of them could be making around the same or less. In my husband’s case because he has been furloughed from his second job and he actually makes more than $275 +600 per week he will be taking a pay cut. Plus it is the $600 become automatic for everybody? He would rather just keep his job LOL
 

Kevin_W

Well-Known Member
Random question: were you forced to make fastpasses for morning, mid-day, and afternoon? A friend is going at the same time and she told me that's what it made her do. I'd never heard that and it didn't sound right to me. They have military tickets, but I don't imagine that would matter.

It was exactly like normal (except the Mickey & Minnie wasn't an option, wasn't it supposed to be?). It had you select morning/afternoon/evening and then it showed you available times in that general timeframe. But you could click the attraction and pick anything available that day.
 

Rich Brownn

Well-Known Member
I just looked it up, you’re correct on the $275.
If WDW employees are furloughed or laid off, many will actually be bringing home more than if they were working.

What a genius bill. 🙄
Florida's minimum wage is $8.46/hr. And if people are getting paid more on unemployment (a whopping $1000 a month for 3 months) and trying to survive -- well, that says more about how corporations treat their employees rather than the people.
 

Parker in NYC

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
That is not a valid analogy. People who commit crimes like murder and rape harm others intentionally. However, people who are deemed mentally incompetent are treated instead of sent to prison.

In the case of this disease, it is acceptable to order me to be quarantined if I have the disease and am known to be able to spread it. If I disobey the quarantine order I am essentially choosing to purposely put others at risk.

The measures being taken to control this disease order people that are not infected to give up their freedom because they might become infected. Only after they become infected can they put others at risk.

Before somebody brings up asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic transmission, in the past few briefings, Dr. Birx has basically said that they still don't know the methods of transmission. She speculated that there was a possibility that the spread in NYC is due to heavily touched metal surfaces.

The measures that are being taken assume that there is essentially an invisible cloud of virus surrounding every person infected that will easily spread to another person breathing within 6 feet of them. None of this has been proven or explained by leading infectious disease experts.

If these measures are to continue, extreme effort must be put into quickly understanding the transmission, especially amongst the asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic. Significant spread by those categories of patients is the only justification for any of the current measures. If spread is determined to be almost completely by symptomatic (however mild) patients and surface transmission, none of these measures are justifiable. If the latter is the case, screening people for symptoms when entering any publicly accessible building with large capacity and workplace and then isolating and testing anybody with a symptom until they test negative would be the proper way to control it.

While it would be unsettling to be temperature screened and observed before entering Walmart, it would be far preferable to being holed up in my house trying to avoid insanity by arguing about it on this forum.

No one but you is deciding that you should avoid insanity by arguing about the virus on this forum. Write a book, take up a hobby, donate money and whatever resources you can muster remotely to help ease our situation. But you're bored, boo hoo.
 

easyrowrdw

Well-Known Member
It was exactly like normal (except the Mickey & Minnie wasn't an option, wasn't it supposed to be?). It had you select morning/afternoon/evening and then it showed you available times in that general timeframe. But you could click the attraction and pick anything available that day.

Thank you. I told her that I hadn't heard anything like that before and that she should try to modify them. She hasn't been in a long time so she's not very familiar with the process.
 

21stamps

Well-Known Member
Florida's minimum wage is $8.46/hr. And if people are getting paid more on unemployment (a whopping $1000 a month for 3 months) and trying to survive -- well, that says more about how corporations treat their employees rather than the people.

How are you coming up with $1000 per month? They’re going to be making over $20 per hour on unemployment. Much more than they were making before. Meanwhile, people who were making, let’s use an even $2000 per week and laid off or furloughed due to coronavirus, they’re seeing a drastic decrease. Not saying that pay should be $2000 per week for the unfortunate people who were furloughed or laid off, but it’s so horrible to me that too many people will end up making more.. and then add in their $1200 checks and dependent checks.

The government is throwing money at people where it didn’t need to be thrown, and we’ll all pay for it. Again though, Andrew is correct that it would have taken too long to do it differently, it’s still a bit gross though.
 

GoofGoof

Premium Member
I just looked it up, you’re correct on the $275.
If WDW employees are furloughed or laid off, many will actually be bringing home more than if they were working.

What a genius bill. 🙄
Many of the people making less than $875 a week work more than one job. You only get the $600, not $600 per job. There are probably some younger workers who may still live at home who could benefit. It’s not perfect, but in a time like this that’s far from the biggest problem. It’s also capped at 4 months. Nobody is going to turn down long term employment to gain some extra money for a few months.
 

21stamps

Well-Known Member
Many of the people making less than $875 a week work more than one job. You only get the $600, not $600 per job. There are probably some younger workers who may still live at home who could benefit. It’s not perfect, but in a time like this that’s far from the biggest problem. It’s also capped at 4 months. Nobody is going to turn down long term employment to gain some extra money for a few months.
Do the math on 4 months, or even 1 month, or all of the stimulus checks to people who never lost income or shouldn’t qualify due to not enough income.
2 trillion dollars is what was spent, printed. That number could have been drastically cut down. People who are drastically affected will still be drastically affected, while many others will make more than they were making before this happened.
It is what it is though. Unfortunately.
 

Jwink

Well-Known Member
Florida's minimum wage is $8.46/hr. And if people are getting paid more on unemployment (a whopping $1000 a month for 3 months) and trying to survive -- well, that says more about how corporations treat their employees rather than the people.
Whoa whoa... I thought it was $275+$600 a WEEK... omg is it a month?! My family and I will be in trouble. I thought it was $600 a week
 

Virtual Toad

Well-Known Member
I know. It’s just a bit sickening nonetheless. A percentage of income would have been better than needlessly throwing money away.. but I understand that would have taken too long...repeat sentence 2.
I'm sure given a choice most WDW cast would gladly give up their newfound-- and in your words "sickening"-- windfall of $275 a week and go back to work at the place we all love. Unfortunately there's this thing out there, you know, a pandemic. Which is making everyone's lives a challenge. Some apparently more of a challenge than others.
 

trainplane3

Well-Known Member
Florida's minimum wage is $8.46/hr. And if people are getting paid more on unemployment (a whopping $1000 a month for 3 months) and trying to survive -- well, that says more about how corporations treat their employees rather than the people.
And here I was in 2010 getting paid $10.25 to literally scoop ice cream at a Ben & Jerry's. That's...wow...
 

21stamps

Well-Known Member
I'm sure given a choice most WDW cast would gladly give up their newfound-- and in your words "sickening"-- windfall of $275 a week and go back to work at the place we all love. Unfortunately there's this thing out there, you know, a pandemic. Which is making everyone's lives a challenge. Some apparently more of a challenge than others.

It’s $875 per week. Not $275. Look, there are people who will need to make major adjustments in their lives, and some who may not bounce back for years if so many of the companies who did mass layoffs, do not choose to rehire for quite some time.

It’s sad to me, extremely sad, that many people will experience that, while many more end up profiting off the situation at what will end up being all of our expense.

I don’t want to say any more about it, as I don’t know if that’s considered political or not. I really just wanted to point out what’s going to happen, and why Disney may have waiting to decided until the bill had passed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom