Coronavirus and Walt Disney World general discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
And your anti vaccine mandate TX governor is now asking for federal assistance to combat covid? I find that back to normal very hard to believe and I have friends who live and work in Houston that would agree.
Which means absolutely nothing.

New York has the highest cases per 100,000 in the country… despite having the most strict safeguards in place.

Does that mean it’s the Governors fault? Absolutely not.

I’m so tired of people trying to make this political so it’s “the other sides fault”. Covid doesn’t care! It doesn’t care if you are a Rep or Dem, it doesn’t care if you have mask mandates, it doesn’t care if you have vaccine passports, it doesn’t care if you have vaccine mandates… Covid doesn’t care what your governor says or thinks.

I wish it were as easy as politics but clearly it isn’t, we want to think we can control this but we can’t. We can have an impact but that’s a far cry from control. Get vaccinated (because it’s the best option we have) and live your life. Trying to find someone to blame for a natural phenomenon does nothing.

Edited to add… this isn’t directed at Lilofan, we have all been arguing about this for so long it was just the post that set me off.
 
Last edited:

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
I would think natural immunity and vaccinations are the only way out. I’m not entirely sure it ends any other way, certainly doesn’t look like vaccinations only will do it. (Got my vaccination debating the booster currently.)
Let's be clear about "natural immunity." I know it is often uses as a shorthand for "getting infected with a virus and surviving due to the body's immunological system."

But that natural immune response of the body is also the very same natural immune response from a vaccine. A vaccine causes a "natural" immune response.

Yes, the vaccine isn't "natural." But neither are most medications or surgeries. Getting monoclonal antibody infusions or anti-viral medications ain't natural either. In the end, the body needs to respond "naturally" to get better.

And it's a heck of a lot better to create that natural immune response from a vaccine, which has a minuscule risk, than having a virus replicating in your body, destroying cells and organs, and giving one good odds of being hospitalized or dying.

And the "natural immune response" from catching the virus can wane over time, just it can from the vaccine. The only way to boost the immune system "the natural way" from getting infected *again* is to risk serious illness or death over and over again. With the vaccine, that is accomplished with a booster shot and avoiding possible death.

And so... the plan to rely on both vaccinations and actually getting infected is a bad idea compared to everyone getting vaccinated. Because then you avoid all the stays in ICU and the pile up of dead human beings.
 

mmascari

Well-Known Member
To be quite honest, here in TX life has been back to normal for a long time and has not changed in any meaningful way with Omicron.
I will admit to not following TX very directly. However, didn't the governor ask for a bunch of federal help to deal with COVID in just the last week? If things are back to normal, why is the help needed?

Not a debate on him, his prior actions, or federal actions, as none of that matters for how we got to here and now. But, "we need federal help" and "everything is normal" don't sound like the same thing. Which makes me think everything is not normal.
 

sullyinMT

Well-Known Member
While I agree that we aren't putting this one back in the box, and that some member along this viral family tree will be with us ongoing or for a very long time, does that mean we have to deal with the uncertainties in social, economic, and healthcare well being, also? Or should businesses and governments be doing everything in their respective power to squeeze every last vaccination possible out of people? In my opinion, that answer is yes. If we could get to a point where the guidance changed to "only test if symptomatic," and healthcare systems weren't at risk of being overrun, then we could care as little as the virus does. Currently, our only options are a return to blunt force lockdowns and all of that disruption or a further tightening of the screws on the unvaccinated. Not because it will eliminate the virus, but because we want the decoupling of cases and hospitalization/death that seems possible with this variant. Heck, it would have been possible even with the more violent Delta if we would have had another 20% of people vaccinated before each region's respective wave (based on the huge disparity of vaxxed/unvaxxed hospitalizations).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

maui2k7

Well-Known Member
Currently, our only options are a return to blunt force lockdowns and all of that disruption or a further tightening of the screws on the unvaccinated. Not because it will eliminate the virus, but because we want the decoupling of cases and hospitalization/death that seems possible with this variant. Heck, it would have been possible even with the more violent Delta if we would have had another 20% of people vaccinated before each region's respective wave (based on the huge disparity of vaxxed/unvaxxed hospitalizations).

Omicron Cases Are Hitting Highs, But New Data Put End in Sight​

Data suggest hospitalizations are now decoupled from case numbers, and the variant causes less severe disease

Bloomberg Article
 
Last edited:

matt9112

Well-Known Member
Quality stuff. Great to hear an intelligent field report from the front lines. We really gotta get testing sorted out so people aren't going to the friggin ER for a covid test. What a travesty.

This article to me just says what i think we already knew...covid is everywhere...if you get sick stay home and get well and only specific groups of people actually need to be in the ER. Stop clogging that place up. Drink alot of water and get some rest.
 

Polkadotdress

Well-Known Member
If we could get to a point where the guidance changed to "only test if symptomatic," and healthcare systems weren't at risk of being overrun, then we could care as little as the virus does.
Well, our FL Surgeon General was just at a presser yesterday touting this very idea, that we will soon be "testing for treatment" to reduce the volume of testing and demand for tests (likely because it's nearly impossible to find a test/test site).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Andrew C

You know what's funny?
I will admit to not following TX very directly. However, didn't the governor ask for a bunch of federal help to deal with COVID in just the last week? If things are back to normal, why is the help needed?

Not a debate on him, his prior actions, or federal actions, as none of that matters for how we got to here and now. But, "we need federal help" and "everything is normal" don't sound like the same thing. Which makes me think everything is not normal.
He asked for help with testing and treatment....like so many other states. One, testing shortage nationwide. Two, treatment allocation in many cases are controlled by the feds. The "everything is normal" point is probably in regards to no mitigation mandates by the state beyond the vaccine and recommendations/suggestions.
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
Unfortunately some do listen to what he says even when he stood defiant in regards to vaccine mandates.

Who are they listening to?

Governor Abbott is fully vaccinated and has said vaccines are the best way out of this.

“I will never ask any Texan to do something that I'm not willing to do myself," Abbott said moments before the injection. Once it was all over, Abbott added, "didn't feel a thing," and thanked the nurse who administered the shot.

You can be anti-mandate and still pro-vax.

Even Trump is vaccinated and tells people to get vaccinated. I’m not sure who people are listening to but it’s obviously not politicians.
 

Lilofan

Well-Known Member
Who are they listening to?

Governor Abbott is fully vaccinated and has said vaccines are the best way out of this.

“I will never ask any Texan to do something that I'm not willing to do myself," Abbott said moments before the injection. Once it was all over, Abbott added, "didn't feel a thing," and thanked the nurse who administered the shot.

You can be anti-mandate and still pro-vax.

Even Trump is vaccinated and tells people to get vaccinated. I’m not sure who people are listening to but it’s obviously not politicians.
It seemed apparent it is falling on some mislead and guillible deaf ears and even one you mentioned was met with catcalls, hisses, and boos. Mandate it and get them vaccinated.
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
It seemed apparent it is falling on some mislead and guillible deaf ears and even one you mentioned was met with catcalls, hisses, and boos. Mandate it and get them vaccinated.
There’s a bunch of media hacks making bank off misinformation but I don’t think a state can stop that.

States have a historical precedence to enact vaccine mandates, have any?

Many states have state employee mandates, health care employee mandates, etc but I can’t think of a single state that’s actually enacted a statewide Covid vaccine mandate. Not even New York (who’ve gone the furthest with passports) has enacted a statewide mandate.

This isn’t a red state blue state thing, no one’s done a mandate, a few states have banned mandates but none have enacted one. If it was so easy a mandate could end this why haven’t any done it yet?
 

Andrew C

You know what's funny?
But, Texas (and FL) have both been outwardly anti-vax mandate, making them illegal. So, it seems that one shouldn't be so blatantly "not listening to the federal experts" and then also cry for help.
The outcome/situation would have been the same whether the state supported federal vaccine mandates or not. I see treatment and testing as a separate issue.

And I fully support any state who wants to mandate vaccines for all of their citizens...but no one has...I guess they all see the consequences of doing so too great? 🤷‍♂️
 

Andrew C

You know what's funny?
Stating that there aren't enough tests because the feds haven't sent them. Same with the monoclonal antibodies.
This is accurate. Shortage of testing nationwide and the feds seem to want to control the monoclonal antibody treatments rather closely. I think they paused sending them out for a bit if I am not mistaken?
 

Lilofan

Well-Known Member
This is accurate. Shortage of testing nationwide and the feds seem to want to control the monoclonal antibody treatments rather closely. I think they paused sending them out for a bit if I am not mistaken?
Just like pretty much every product out there - supply chain constraints , you probably heard of that affects shipments.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Unsurprisingly for a Bloomberg article on health issues, the very text of the article that says this...

“When your denominator is very large because many, many people are getting infected, you still wind up having many people going to the hospital who need care,” Justman said. Higher case numbers will also still create disruption in work, travel and schooling

Contradicts their clickbait byline...

Data suggest hospitalizations are now decoupled from case numbers, and the variant causes less severe disease​

There is zero "decoupling" of cases v. hospitalization. They are very much *coupled*. Hospitalizations are spiking everywhere precisely because of Omicron. The good news is that Omicron leads to hospitalization less often (but not *decoupled*). The bad news is that Omicron is many times more infectious, leading to new record highs in hospitalization... due to that pesky "coupling."

1641324236297.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom