It’s a far better example. Is it perfect? No. I never claimed it was. But it certainly has more of an impact. Most everyone knows what a full pro football stadium looks like. Multiply that over 8 games. Yeah…pretty clear.
Total number of COVID deaths in the United States: 641,725 (CDC).
Average per game NFL attendance: 66,151 (2019).
Number of football games it would take to represent U.S. COVID deaths using those numbers: 9.7.
Stadium size and specific attendance figures would cause that number to fluctuate. Using Chicago’s Soldier Field at full attendance would give you a number of 10.43 games. Lambeau Field, with a capacity of around 81,441, would put the number at about 7.88 games. So there appears to be a bit of wiggle room there.
I’m not an NFL fan. The minor league team I root for had an average attendance of 5,497 in 2019. Small potatoes compared to the NFL, but our small stadium is packed with fans nonetheless.
Using that attendance number, U.S. deaths from COVID would represent attendance at
116.75 of our team’s games—
more than 7 years’ worth of home games in fact. So for a fan sitting in the stands at our home field, that seems like a ton of people and the perceived impact is far greater.
At the end of the day, the statistics used tend to reflect how the person using those statistics perceives the issue at hand.
A public health official concerned about the spread of a deadly virus might choose to use the number of war dead as a comparison. They might also use the statistic that
the number of U.S. deaths from COVID is now equivalent to more than 215 times the number of deaths in the September 11 attacks. And counting.
Someone else may or may not choose to use a different comparison.