That’s not how probabilities work and you know that.
It’s how they work when I’m concerned about vaccine side effects but not the other way around. Ironic
You have to look at the sample sizes.
34,380,019 cases, 608,403 deaths.
6,218,406 cases age 18-29, 2,732 deaths. Plus at least 1 double lung transplant.
163,025,726 fully vaccinated, 3 deaths from side effects.
1.7696, 0.0439, 0.0000018
So sure we can call the second two both “zero”, but the first one is 24 thousand times bigger.
That’s why the “but the vaccine risk” is discounted and the “young people are fine” is not. The lung one, assuming it’s the only one, is an exaggeration, it’s a risk but super low, more likely to just die.
This is also why there is so much vaccine safety testing. They know the vaccine sample size will be enormous. Large enough that even small things would impact an absolute number if there was an issue.
At even that very low rate, for the 2,732 people in that group, the impact was dramatic. Better to vaccinate and avoid even that small chance, since the impact is so severe.