Is that the excuse they're using in the rest of the world?We wouldn't be having these issues if Republicans had taken the pandemic seriously. We're reaping the fruits of their denial campaign now.
Is that the excuse they're using in the rest of the world?We wouldn't be having these issues if Republicans had taken the pandemic seriously. We're reaping the fruits of their denial campaign now.
You keep saying "vast majority of people are vaccinated" and "small percent of people are unvaccinated". I keep saying those numbers have no direct impact on use of mitigations. They only impact the cases and spread level. If the vast number never get's high enough to get the case and spread low enough, then it's all wasted effort.We can agree to disagree. I can tell you with 100% certainty that people will not continue following Covid safety protocols and mask wearing for very long once the vast majority of people are vaccinated. In no way will people accept that they have to wear a mask indefinitely because a small percent of people are unvaccinated. You think after 365+ days of lots of people doing whatever they want they will suddenly decide to contribute to a community solution?
Except those two things have no direct relationship. If there's no public interaction, might as well just have the unvaccinated not there. Then, at least it would be a completely vaccinated group interacting.I see no issue with employers requiring masks or vaccination as a stop gap until community spread is virtually gone and all protocols can be removed.
We're numb to the numbers. We're still over 1,000 people a day dying from COVID.Exactly. A lot of people are getting fed up with the whole thing and will start going back to "normal" whether conditions warrant it or not.
Agreed, which is not a good plan. We need to hang on a little while longer and I think the best way to get people to do that is dangle the big carrot of a return to normal once we all get vaccinated.
That would be DisneyFan32, who is either a bot or a troll. I blocked the account a while ago, but many people keep feeding the troll.
Agree 100% with the bolded. The flu, at large, is not generally a public health concern. An unabated outbreak in a hospital setting could prove catastrophic to the vulnerable patients and the ability to staff the hospital. Shot requirements are a reasonable measure in my place of work. It's also why I conditioned my statement with "once fully approved."I think hospitals are a special case because people who work there are in contact with an especially vulnerable population. Requiring masks in otherwise healthy populations may prove more difficult.
In my opinion, masks should be used for one reason only - to contain the pandemic. They should not be used as part of a carrot and stick approach to coerce/entice people into getting a vaccine that can’t be required because of their EUA status. Nor should they be used (as some posters suggested) as a means of signaling to others that we care about them.
If the CDC, governments and employers are going to implement rules that have unmasked, vaccinated people working or going to school next to masked, unvaccinated people, I hope there will be some very solid science showing how much of an effect those rules have on containing the pandemic.
Side note. I realize that 150 a day, 54,750 a year makes me a monster to some (maybe even myself) and makes me scared and hiding in my basement to others.I've said before, when the number get's below 150 a day nationally, I'm betting all mitigations everywhere will be removed for everything. Hopefully with some surveillance testing and tracing of cases to keep the cases and spread low enough that it stays at 150. Reductions in mitigations as we move from 1,000 to 150 not all at once at the end.
There’s no need to be insulting. It debases the quality of the discussion.
It was phrased in an insulting way.I wasn’t insulting anyone.. or at least not my intent. In response to someone saying they didn’t understand my point, I repeated my point as simply as possible.
And I know with certainty that I will continue to wear the mask and keep my distance, until further notice.Basically, people want answers that are absolute and certain.
It was phrased in an insulting way.
still comes across as a bit condescending at best. Maybe not your intent but it did to me no matter which word you used.I see how that could have been the take. I typed "simply" (or meant to), and my auto-correct changed it to "slowly"
I'll go back and edit to make the intent clear.
Agree 100% with the bolded. The flu, at large, is not generally a public health concern. An unabated outbreak in a hospital setting could prove catastrophic to the vulnerable patients and the ability to staff the hospital. Shot requirements are a reasonable measure in my place of work. It's also why I conditioned my statement with "once fully approved."
IF we get to July and the pandemic isn't declared over (very likely to still be going on, imo), school districts should announce that students who are eligible to receive the vaccine will have the requirement added to the list of required vaccines. Remote can be an option for students and teachers who opt out. Quite honestly, because of the known spread of flu in the school setting, that should be added, too. But one bird at a time, and this is the more dangerous bird. Again, assuming full approval.
In the above scenario, school staff and eligible aged students (I'll assume 12+ gets approval between now and then) will be vaccinated. At that point, classrooms can be mask free according to current guidelines set forth by the CDC and assuming small gatherings by 7/4 as previously telegraphed. If things improve greatly irt community spread, it would be great if a vaccinated teacher of the under 12 students could teach an unmasked classroom. Of course, we may be in such a great place come the start of next school year none of this matters. Or, the hyper-concerning variants raise Unholy Heck on us all and we're pitchforking each other for toilet paper and bacon again.
There has to be some correlation. If the vaccines work and if enough people take them its not likely that cases and deaths will not also drop. As I said before, if that turns out to be the case and the vaccines fail for whatever reason then we have to pivot the plan, but I’m confident the vaccines will work.You keep saying "vast majority of people are vaccinated" and "small percent of people are unvaccinated". I keep saying those numbers have no direct impact on use of mitigations. They only impact the cases and spread level. If the vast number never get's high enough to get the case and spread low enough, then it's all wasted effort.
Except those two things have no direct relationship. If there's no public interaction, might as well just have the unvaccinated not there. Then, at least it would be a completely vaccinated group interacting.
We're numb to the numbers. We're still over 1,000 people a day dying from COVID.
I've said before, when the number get's below 150 a day nationally, I'm betting all mitigations everywhere will be removed for everything. Hopefully with some surveillance testing and tracing of cases to keep the cases and spread low enough that it stays at 150. Reductions in mitigations as we move from 1,000 to 150 not all at once at the end.
I think some people are getting comfortable with 1,000 day. Roughly 365,000 a year dying. It's sad to say, but some people were comfortable with 1,500 or 2,000 too.
When masks will no longer in general public soon, maybe July or summer?There has to be some correlation. If the vaccines work and if enough people take them its not likely that cases and deaths will not also drop. As I said before, if that turns out to be the case and the vaccines fail for whatever reason then we have to pivot the plan, but I’m confident the vaccines will work.
The CDC has already altered mask and distancing guidance for fully vaccinated people only for private residence gathering and also for quarantine requirements and are looking at overall travel recommendation so there is some precedent for relaxing certain restrictions based solely on vaccination status. I agree that once we hit some date in May or June where we have vaccinated most of the population that there is no light switch to remove all public covid restrictions. Cases will factor in as well. I do think it’s possible to further relax mask and distancing requirements at least in non-public facing workplaces once the vaccine has been offered to all workers. So if for example a factory runs a JnJ vaccine clinic for the workers they would make a policy that any employee who is fully vaccinated doesn‘t need a mask anymore. Those with no vaccine still need to wear a mask until the time that masks are no longer needed in the general public. Would be a great incentive for everyone to take the jab.
Maybe not for youth. Previously Pfizer had stated an intent to file for full approval in April, and I assume that means for the initial EUA group (16+). Future age groups and their trials will be treated separately. Moderna, then, shouldn't be too far behind that target. Employer requirements (including teachers) for mask or shot could roll in soon after.Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination with a Covid-19 vaccine distributed under an EUA
As decision-makers at organizations decide on their Covid-19 vaccination policy, they should be careful to not let this passion lead the organization to run afoul of the law.www.statnews.com
Do you think full FDA approval will be given before school begins in the fall?
I'm scheduled for my first shot on March 31. Yay!I agree that we should continue to highlight the benefits of getting vaccinated.
Is it amazingly sad that people need to be offered a carrot to take a vaccine against a worldwide deadly pandemic? Live free or Die as they say.There has to be some correlation. If the vaccines work and if enough people take them its not likely that cases and deaths will not also drop. As I said before, if that turns out to be the case and the vaccines fail for whatever reason then we have to pivot the plan, but I’m confident the vaccines will work.
The CDC has already altered mask and distancing guidance for fully vaccinated people only for private residence gathering and also for quarantine requirements and are looking at overall travel recommendation so there is some precedent for relaxing certain restrictions based solely on vaccination status. I agree that once we hit some date in May or June where we have vaccinated most of the population that there is no light switch to remove all public covid restrictions. Cases will factor in as well. I do think it’s possible to further relax mask and distancing requirements at least in non-public facing workplaces once the vaccine has been offered to all workers. So if for example a factory runs a JnJ vaccine clinic for the workers they would make a policy that any employee who is fully vaccinated doesn‘t need a mask anymore. Those with no vaccine still need to wear a mask until the time that masks are no longer needed in the general public. Would be a great incentive for everyone to take the jab.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.