What feels like 1,000 posts ago, related to Vaccine Passports, someone suggested exceptions for the super small number of people who cannot get a vaccine."Disney Cruise Line is facing four federal lawsuits from Utah and Arizona tourists who claim they contacted the coronavirus while on board the Disney Fantasy ship last March, just before the cruise business docked during the pandemic.
This is an example of the problem with that plan.
Change allowing exceptions for customers to only allowing exceptions for employees and it's the same issue.
In a "vaccinated only venue" scenario, someone with a valid exception will eventually get sick and trace it back to the venue. They'll trace it back so someone who fibbed on being vaccinated to get the special thing that was allowed. The venue will be sued for all the money for failing to exclude the fibber. Doesn't matter if it's right, wrong, or whatever was displayed or agreed to. The suit will happen anyway.
That's the calculation being done by any group looking to use a vaccine passport. Can they take that liability.
There's some caveats to this. Insurance can shift the liability. If the vaccine passport issuing authority is willing to cover the liability of the exposure, that would shift the calculation. It wouldn't eliminate it, but it could shift the math some. It might just create more lawsuits as the issuer accuses the venue of not doing it right to avoid becoming the liable party.
The good news is, it looks like if they take 3 months to work this out (2 if you're optimistic), it will not matter anymore. Cases and spread will be down and it will not matter or be needed. At least domestically.
Internationally, where the end date is further out for many countries is a different matter. Fortunately, the government can afford the liability. They already manage the liability for anyone entering with a normal passport.