GoofGoof
Premium Member
You are cherry picking a stat to make your point. I think someone in the Federal government once suggested our case numbers only look so bad because we test too much. That was wrong thinking then and still is. You need to look at everything. If a state like Idaho has a 25% positive or Texas at 12% they are clearly not doing enough testing and their cases per 100,000 is low compared to actual community spread.New York is constantly running commercials telling people to get tested weekly or biweekly even if they have recovered from Covid19 or been vaccinated. Why? The reason to get tested is to see if you have it. If you had ir in the past, you know your symptoms and should not get tested unless you are sick. So, why is NY encouraging people to get tested anyway? Is it to lower the percentage of positive results? Or maybe it's just to have the Federal Government pay for more testing and employment that is unnecessary. In either case the result is the same. If you want to know the true rate in each state conduct an independent sample. The way testing is done today is not comparable because each state is doing it differently. So I consider the cases per 100,000 number that scientists said anything over 10 is bad is what should be used. NY, NJ and RI are the 3 worst states for Covid19 according to the independent NY Times and NY and NJ have 48% more cases on Average than number 4 South Carolina.