Coronavirus and Walt Disney World general discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

techgeek

Well-Known Member
I was just using TMD as an example of how much comparatively Disney is pouring into 50 plus new productions announced yesterday. For the shows, the per episode cost may not be the exact same, but that just shows how postponing or leaving one of those productions in development, just *one* could help these employees.

Disney's cash flow without the parks isn't great, but they will make it. The people who buy shares in Disney will make it (the 1 percent has gotten even richer during this pandemic). These 28000 employees may not. Central Florida is flirting with what will be probably a worse recession then what the nation is bracing for post-COVID

If Disney is so intent on doubling down on production and streaming, they should have moved production on some of these announced shows to Orlando and given displaced parks tech and talent a preferred shot at crewing them up. Put furloughed F&B cast to work on craft services. Opened up a few hotel wings to support productions and house people.

Yes, I know ‘theme park’ people aren’t ‘Hollywood’ people, but there’s a fair amount of crossover in the skill sets.
 

SamusAranX

Well-Known Member
Any amount of unnecessary gathering and/or travelling is a bad idea in the context of a pandemic. All the health experts are telling us this. I can’t for the life of me understand why people’s love of Disney is blinding them to something so self-evident.

Because if other businesses can operate safely and minimize risks enough, then they should be allowed to stay open. This has never been about eliminating risk completely; it's been about finding ways to keep economically what we can going, while minimizing risk to the smallest degree possible. For some businesses, or business operations, such as indoor dining, that isn't possible. But in lieu of a study showing massive risk and sizable levels of transmission at DW, they should be allowed to remain open.

It is it the job of the prosecution (i.e. the one making the accusation or assertion) that Disney is unsafe and too risky to provide proof. not on the defense ;)
 

DisneyDebRob

Well-Known Member
Please provide the studies proving it. Not circumstantial evidence or speculation as to the likes of "there has to be, it just hasn't been proven yet".
It’s the departing airport, the arrival airport.. it’s the transportation to the hotel.. it’s the thousands of people in the parks, restaurants and merch shops.. it’s the bus back to departing airport, then the arrival airport. You can say show me where a case can be linked to Disney, well that is tough to do. But to think with the virus spreading like wildfire, that all this unnecessary travel is ok I think you would be wrong. If almost one in 10 or 15 or 20.. for that matter let’s say one in a hundred has the virus, it’s there. Can’t be linked maybe, but it’s all around.
 
Last edited:

oceanbreeze77

Well-Known Member
Up until this point, it was also a regional problem. Northeast in the spring, south in the summer, and midwest in the fall. There were available healthcare workers, the ability to borrow other states resources, etc. Now, its a problem NATIONWIDE the whole nation is dark red. We are now going to have to work together as a nation to stop the spread whether we like it or not.
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
Because if other businesses can operate safely and minimize risks enough, then they should be allowed to stay open. This has never been about eliminating risk completely; it's been about finding ways to keep economically what we can going, while minimizing risk to the smallest degree possible. For some businesses, or business operations, such as indoor dining, that isn't possible. But in lieu of a study showing massive risk and sizable levels of transmission at DW, they should be allowed to remain open.

It is it the job of the prosecution (i.e. the one making the accusation or assertion) that Disney is unsafe and too risky to provide proof. not on the defense ;)
I’ve not framed it in terms of whether they should be “allowed” to operate. This is Florida we’re talking about—anything goes.

I’m disappointed in Disney itself for remaining open.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
A good read on what happened to one place that had wide open spaces with no masks needed, they thought. Most of this could have been helped. Still we argue in some circles about masks. Science is behind it. I say that last sentence before the “ magic mask” people start to comment.

For masks to be effective, people need to wear them and social distance when they are in close proximity to others for a significant length of time, especially indoors. I don't think this is being done. My state is one of the most restrictive, and has been from the beginning, yet we've seen two serious spikes. They weren't caused by lack of mask mandates - we've had them since May 1 with excellent compliance. My guess is that people are wearing them religiously under circumstances where the virus is less likely to be spread, and ignoring them where mask use can't be monitored.
 

SamusAranX

Well-Known Member
I’ve not framed it in terms of whether they should be “allowed” to operate. This is Florida we’re talking about—anything goes.

I’m disappointed in Disney itself for remaining open.

Don't me wrong morally, Disney staying open is questionable at best. But if they close again...god help central florida.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom