I think it’s pretty clear from the list that states that had a better plan have kept the cases lower overall and states with less restrictions not so much. I don’t think that’s the real argument though, the debate is does it matter. For example they went forward with a large motorcycle rally despite knowing it would be a big problem, but the argument was that the economic damage from not doing it would be worse than the virus damage. Similar to FL now. Nobody can say with a straight face they think removing all restrictions is a good move for FL from the public health perspective. The governor is saying the economy matters more so remove the restrictions.
My personal opinion is I’m not so sure that removing all restrictions is actually better for the economy in the medium to long term. I think it’s over simplifying things to say less limitations mean more business, especially with tourism. You need people to want to travel to an area. Lifting restrictions may attract the younger, bar crowd but is likely to sour the older crowd and families. So if I’m a bar owner it’s a no brainer for me to want no restrictions but if I’m WDW or a diner that relies on retirees I’m less happy with that plan because my demographics aren’t as happy with it.