Coronavirus and Walt Disney World general discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

SamusAranX

Well-Known Member
I live in the Philly area and have family members and friends who are Philly cops and first responders so itā€™s not just some BS political talking point for me. I donā€™t see how what happened has anything to do with Covid and Disney World so maybe not the best place to talk about it.

no harm no foul I hope. Was just making some good natured ribbing šŸ˜‰
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Where are you generating these from? They are very good graphs.
 

dreday3

Well-Known Member
this greatly concerns me; why? Italy has mandated masks indoors and on public transportation since May. And they are not the only country with mandates experiencing surges. This is a disconcerting trend and something that bears watching

Italy and other countries in Europe have not been the poster children for mask compliance and social distancing over the summer, it was almost abandoned.

Not that we have either, but let's not think "oh they all were wearing masks, social distancing, restrictions and the virus still spread".
 

danlb_2000

Premium Member
What if people canā€™t work from home? What if they are a bus driver or cop or firefighter or work at the grocery store?

Even if people work from home what if they need to ride a bus or go to a doctorā€™s appointment or a grocery store? They need to be able to still leave their homes, in some cases to eat and in others to have a quality of life. Iā€™m not in the high risk group and not elderly but I donā€™t feel right telling people who are they need to stay home indefinitely.

I think we do need to protect the high risk group, but they have to have the ability to live and work or the economy will grind to a halt. We worry about restaurants and stores going under but if we tell a large portion of the population to isolate and avoid contact with others altogether thatā€™s a lot of people sitting out of the economy. So bars that have primarily young and healthy people as customers may thrive but a lot of other businesses would suffer and they would also be without some of their key employees which only makes things worse.

Just saw this in an article:

"The South Salt Lake City, Utah, woman canā€™t work at her special education job due to an autoimmune disease. Her husband, also a special ed teacher, recently quit because his school district would not allow him to work remotely to protect her and their 5-year-old son, who has asthma."

So not only do we need to talk about directly protecting at risk people, we would need protections for low-risk people who have to have contact with high-risk people.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I don't know what this means.

I agree. But the line of the conversation was that a national mask mandate could be implemented by the President. Both the current President and the guy who might take his place seem to believe it can't. That's all I was responding to.


Simple: you give a national ā€œstandardā€...purely optional.

Then the congress passes a package of measures that pay for the enforcement...the confederacy complains...but ultimately lines up and takes the money.

Then, you give them money through incentives on other things that are not subtlety contingent on towing the line.

This has been the way since about 1900

I agree with the part that says we donā€™t know for sure. I donā€™t think Disney is making its decisions right now based on polls of how guests feel about safety protocols.

I bet itā€™s straight up economy watching...they know they wonā€™t rake till things are on a huge upswing and that canā€™t be sustained with the public health issues.

@Tink242424 perhaps you'd like to share what's so funny about wearing a mask during a pandemic and discussing the science that proves that masks help reduce spread seeing as you continue to put laughing reactions on posts that aren't remotely funny.

Experience shows that the laugh emoji means ā€œI got nothingā€
 

Tink242424

Well-Known Member
I'm aware that the hospitalization rate goes down based on age groups, but it's not really a statistical analysis that shows that they aren't at risk if you don't know the medical history of those younger patients who were hospitalized compared with the medical history of people in the same group who weren't hospitalized. It also discounts that even those who are not at risk can come into contact with those who are at risk. Nursing home patients weren't all going down to the bars and spreading COVID-19. The virus was brought into those buildings from the outside by people you would say are not high risk. What about younger people with asthma or an autoimmune disorder? They may not be morbidly obese but they can be hospitalized or killed if they catch the virus - and eliminating restrictions increases their odds of catching the virus.
For the majority of nursing homes this is not true. The true root of spread is infected seniors being ordered to go back to these facilities where they spread it to other residents. This was evident in NY and NJ at the beginning of the pandemic where the all mighty Cuomo ordered the nursing homes to take the COVID positive patients and he is responsible for the large number of seniors that died as a result. There may be some exposure from visitors and a slightly greater percentage of the staff bringing in the virus. Most of these facilities were put on lock-downs and are still on lock-downs so only staff are going in and most likely are being tested regularly. My sister is a nurse at an assisted living facility here in NJ and the state mandated all residents and staff are tested on a weekly basis and I would guess many other facilities are following the same process.
 

Tink242424

Well-Known Member
Instead worrying about being "forced to wear a mask". Maybe we should focus on getting more businesses to offer sick time. People keep saying if your sick stay home but many won't as they can't afford it. If more businesses have out sick days it would help a lot.
Yes, that would be an excellent step to ensuring we curb the spread of the virus.
 

easyrowrdw

Well-Known Member
Simple: you give a national ā€œstandardā€...purely optional.

Then the congress passes a package of measures that pay for the enforcement...the confederacy complains...but ultimately lines up and takes the money.

Then, you give them money through incentives on other things that are not subtlety contingent on towing the line.
Can't say I'm a fan of that, but thank you for clarifying.
 

Tink242424

Well-Known Member
That user doesn't believe in mask mandates, either...even though we've got users on these forums who have admitted to not following the CDC recommendation to wear a mask until it was specifically mandated in their state.
No, I don't think it should be a mandate or a law. I support businesses and their right to require masks to enter their business. I have worn a mask long before they were required mainly because I got COVID in mid-March and even though I quarantined for 4 weeks and was likely no where near contagious I still wanted to ensure I wasn't spreading it to others.

I think the messaging has been wrong which is my right to my opinion. I'm not convinced masks are all that people think they are but I have no problem with using them as a tool. I guess my faith in humanity is greater then others. šŸ¤·ā€ā™€ļø
 

hopemax

Well-Known Member
For the majority of nursing homes this is not true. The true root of spread is infected seniors being ordered to go back to these facilities where they spread it to other residents. This was evident in NY and NJ at the beginning of the pandemic where the all mighty Cuomo ordered the nursing homes to take the COVID positive patients and he is responsible for the large number of seniors that died as a result. There may be some exposure from visitors and a slightly greater percentage of the staff bringing in the virus. Most of these facilities were put on lock-downs and are still on lock-downs so only staff are going in and most likely are being tested regularly. My sister is a nurse at an assisted living facility here in NJ and the state mandated all residents and staff are tested on a weekly basis and I would guess many other facilities are following the same process.
This is not true either. Most of the facilities had infections in their staff population before residents were returned and before anyone had a clue how much community spread had already occurred. Secondly, now that we know that people are not usually contagious after the 9th day, it should be obvious that by the time the residents were returned they were no longer infectious. Think about it. A person has to A. Get sick B. Get sick enough to need hospital care C. Recover enough so they no longer need hospital care. That takes time. But yet people believe patients were cycled fast enough to return while still infectious.
 

ImperfectPixie

Well-Known Member
No, I don't think it should be a mandate or a law. I support businesses and their right to require masks to enter their business. I have worn a mask long before they were required mainly because I got COVID in mid-March and even though I quarantined for 4 weeks and was likely no where near contagious I still wanted to ensure I wasn't spreading it to others.

I think the messaging has been wrong which is my right to my opinion. I'm not convinced masks are all that people think they are but I have no problem with using them as a tool. I guess my faith in humanity is greater then others. šŸ¤·ā€ā™€ļø
So what do you propose to do about all the jerks who don't give a crap if they spread a disease that could kill someone? Because even the mandates aren't enough for some of them.
 

Chip Chipperson

Well-Known Member
For the majority of nursing homes this is not true. The true root of spread is infected seniors being ordered to go back to these facilities where they spread it to other residents. This was evident in NY and NJ at the beginning of the pandemic where the all mighty Cuomo ordered the nursing homes to take the COVID positive patients and he is responsible for the large number of seniors that died as a result. There may be some exposure from visitors and a slightly greater percentage of the staff bringing in the virus. Most of these facilities were put on lock-downs and are still on lock-downs so only staff are going in and most likely are being tested regularly. My sister is a nurse at an assisted living facility here in NJ and the state mandated all residents and staff are tested on a weekly basis and I would guess many other facilities are following the same process.

I'm aware, but that wasn't the case in FL. DeSantis even mocked Cuomo for his handling of nursing home cases, but the virus still found its way to FL nursing homes.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom