35 acre ish. and im not sure. just a hypothetical so im not sure it matters much, perhaps in smaller areas or cities as a sort of mini disneyland? and yeah some verticality but its not absolutely necesary. legoland billund is 30 acres and it crams in a whole bunch of rides without much verticalityWhere would a 30-acre Disney park even go? And I agree that we need to get vertical to maximize potential in the small space.
I do my research when it comes to the area of attractions, so i know what im talking about.35 acre ish. and im not sure. just a hypothetical so im not sure it matters much, perhaps in smaller areas or cities as a sort of mini disneyland? and yeah some verticality but its not absolutely necesary. legoland billund is 30 acres and it crams in a whole bunch of rides without much verticality
Your forgetting the big one. Super nintendo world.
It has 2 attractions, a handful of interactive experiences, a table service restaurant and 2 snack stands, 2 shops, and another ride on the way. must be a massive land right?
View attachment 636794
Nope.
Compare this to galaxys edge, a land drastically larger than this, but with about the same amount of offerings.
View attachment 636795
Yeah. But then again i also gave my example. The park doesn’t necessarily need to fully take advantage of multiple stories. I can imagine for queues and the fantasyland sure but legoland billund has 50 attractions and is 35 acres
Super Nintendo World is another example of having things on different levels. The reason they can fit so much is because things were built vertically. Yoshi's ride is like a nintendo version of a peoplemover.
Indeed. But now… which castle to use? Elsa’s ice palace? The Arendelle castle? Agrabah? Rapunzel’s castle? I think the Agrabah castle would work well for a hotel given its shape. The bulbous towers could be good to have rooms inside them.It would be pretty cool to see a Disney castle at the gate like the hotel in Disneyland Paris. You could even make this version a hotel too. This way normal people can finally stay in the castle during their vacation.
More compact rides seem like nice additions as well, to keep the park compact. I think that yes, Adventureland, Tomorrowland, and Fantasyland would be a good selection of lands. A few rides that lend themselves well to being compact are Space Mountain and Alice.@Miru any thoughts on my ideas
Indeed. But now… which castle to use? Elsa’s ice palace? The Arendelle castle? Agrabah? Rapunzel’s castle? I think the Agrabah castle would work well for a hotel given its shape. The bulbous towers could be good to have rooms inside them.
It could also work as a indoor theme park.
Where would it go?
I'm thinking a central U.S. area would be best. Somewhere where it's not too cold, not too hot and doesn't have tornadoes.
Denver is offering a spot for Disney.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.