Cinderellabration??

should-be-BELLE

Member
Original Poster
According to a past thread on this site..rumor went around that Cinderellabration would begin soft openings March 17...I did a search to see if anything recent was brought up and didnt find anything. I saw a pic of a sign with showtimes on it..so has anyone heard or have seen anything on it?

Thanks! :)
 

SpaceRacer2003

New Member
It rained all day 3/17 so I can't tell you if it ran then or not. Today's weather was much better, so maybe someone else can confirm if it ran today or not. It is scheduled for all of the next 2 weeks (don't know the times off the top of my head), along with all the other enhanced MK holiday entertainment.
 

Expo_Seeker40

Well-Known Member
I just saw some video clips of Cinderellabration...at laughingplace....they also have a quick video clip of the IASW clock in action and pictures of IASW from today...

As far as Cinderellabration goes.....ummm...budget issue :hammer: ...now I'm sure "kinks" are being worked out but my God I think I'll watch the tokyo disneyland version at night over and over and over again... :lol:

Yea...when I go to WDW I'll see cinderellabration and videotape it and take pics and stuff, but a daytime show?...nothing can compare [cause we got nothing else really] that can relate to anything like the long, but still well done toko disneyland version of Cinderellabration. :wave:

Hey if Cinderella is crowned a princess...is she called Princess Ella or Princess Cinderella? :p
 

TravisMT81

Well-Known Member
just watched it as well, glad they at least have the lift in this show. I really need to go watch it in person after work one day.
 

cherrynegra

Well-Known Member
Well, the clips were interesting, but of course, pale in comparison to Tokyo's version. I guess I was under the assumption they were lifting the entire night version and bringing it to Orlando. And it seems to be a shortened version of the TDL version. I'm sure it will amuse many people. Anything to draw people away from the rides is a good thing!! :sohappy:
 

justintheschola

New Member
minor spoilors -

a few comments on the show:

Most of the stage shows manage to walk the line of cheesey without going over the top. Cinderellabration, however, is just full blown Disney Cheese. If you like that sort of thing, you'll love this show.

I dig like the ending, however, there is a BIG ISSUE with the small amounts of pyro used. Both times I saw the show, I saw several kids crying afterwards, holding their eyes. I also got some stuff in my eye. They need to do something about that.

They were also filming today. Lots of cameras about, and one giant crane. Looks like they really plan on marketing this, despite the fact that this really isn't all that impressive. To me, if I walked by it, and could get a good view, I might stop to watch for a little bit. It is by no means anything to go out of your way to see.
 

Captain Hank

Well-Known Member
Wow, they REALLY cut from Tokyo. The limited/nearly non-existant plot still works, but you can really notice a difference if you've seen Tokyo's version. I do like that Cinderella actually has a speaking role (sappy as it is), and from the video she appears less like she just got out of a botox treatment. And from the description, they seem to have inserted a random moral, giving some purpose to the show.

I'm sad (though not a bit surprised) that they cut Lady Tremaine and the stepsisters from the show, as I've never seen them in the parks, outside of Tokyo's Cinderellabration. I was actually a bit surprised that they cut the Fab Five. It's also interesting that Tokyo has Beast, while WDW has the post-transformation prince. I do like that the Fairy Godmother has more of a presence, and is a face character as opposed to Tokyo's (freaky looking) mask character.

I'll probably only end up seeing this if I happen to be in the right place at the right time. I'm not going to go out of my way.
 

stitchcastle

Well-Known Member
They cut tooo much of the really good stuff from the Tokyo version..... I hate it, where's Cindy's big entrance in the carriage? and I liked the part in tokyo where the fairy god mother was at the tallest tower instead of the balcony....i'm really dissapointed....and what the heck happened to Beast!?!?!?!?!? it was soooo much better when he was still the Beast! and giving what they've done to Beast they could have at least included Ariel then!.....where's the fab five!?!?!?.....where are Lady tremaine and her kids?.....where are the Queen of Hearts and the White Rabbit?!?!?!?...darn....there are tooo many speeches, and Cindy arrives too soon, they were supposed to milk the wait time before the coronation....darn...rant over...
 

SpenceMan01

Well-Known Member
That looks like crap. They cut out soo much from the TDL version.... and I thought THAT one was a practical snooze-fest. Bring back CSC. I really wish I would have caught it in Jan. :(
 

wbboy29

Member
OK guys, i have sat by long enough and read all your negative posts. If you don't like the show that's fine, its your opinion, but lets not forget all of those performers who have worked there butt off for that last 6 weeks trying to put and good show together. And now they are on that stage trying to perform and make you all happy. Lets not forget that when yuo are ripping apart this fun show.
 

BoyXE

Member
Hmmm, funny the cuts they made from the Tokyo version (I have not seen the show yet on video) sound like they actually improve the story. I'm sure that the show is less grand, but that was inevitable from the start due to stage size, cast size, and the fact that it's done during the day. But cutting the stepsisters, tremaine, and the queen of hearts makes perfect sense to me. I never understood why the family that hates her would even be invited to the coronation let alone want to come, and QoH is just a villain that doesn't quite make sense either. Fab Five is perhaps an unnecessary cut, but frankly they are only in the Tokyo version because any show without Mickey in it---well that doesn't really exist, haha.

Live speaking Cindy and Fairy--good. Shorter version--VERY GOOD. Perhaps nothing special? Well the source material was fundamentally flawed so a scaled back version can't exactly be a whole heap better. But with so many showings it will make it easy to make the show a nice diversion and no time needs to be spoiled waiting in any queues or lotteries or sitting to hold a seat for hours on end for a disappointing product.

Seeing as how the castle shows have been less than spectacular anyway, this one seems like it's a pretty decent step in the right direction. Of course when I watch it in person I may want to change this post, haha, but let's show a little perspective...if they over-publicize the show it will be a mistake. If they allow it to be a pleasant diversion than it will serve it's purpose.

And as for the performers, I'm certain that they are all doing a fantastic job. I'm a performer as well and I rip up my show all the time, it's nothing against any of my fellow castmates or myself. We are only given what we are given. Personally, no human being should ever have to wear the costumes that I have to schlep into 5 times a day, let alone have to watch them as a guest. But that's not really my fault, haha...
 

CTXRover

Well-Known Member
So how many here have actually SEEN the show in its entirity before critiquing it? I haven't seen it (or the tokyo version, even on video), but the photos and short video of MK's show make it look nice enough. I know its a shorter, daytime, less frill version of the TDL show (for various reasons including a much smaller stage size and smaller (standing room only) viewing area necessitating multiple shows throughout the day vs just one at night), but how does it compare to previous castle shows at MK? How has the general guest reacted to it, again compared to previous castle shows?
 

aklodge

Active Member
CTXRover said:
So how many here have actually SEEN the show in its entirity before critiquing it? I haven't seen it (or the tokyo version, even on video), but the photos and short video of MK's show make it look nice enough. I know its a shorter, daytime, less frill version of the TDL show (for various reasons including a much smaller stage size and smaller (standing room only) viewing area necessitating multiple shows throughout the day vs just one at night), but how does it compare to previous castle shows at MK? How has the general guest reacted to it, again compared to previous castle shows?
I wish I was there to see it. It would be nice to see what it compares vs. the other show that appears in the daytime. (I'm not sure of the name, I went blank)
 

Captain Hank

Well-Known Member
I'm really sorry wbboy29, I didn't mean to seem like I was insulting the cast. On the contrary, I thought it was very well acted and choreographed. I just wish they'd given you a show closer to Tokyo's scale to work with. I understand they had to make cuts for various reasons, but wow.

I've also been part of several casts in various productions, and I understand the cohesiveness in a cast and the pride they take in their show. Looking back, I wouldn't want to be on the cast on other side of my comment (or any of the other ones) earlier. But, please understand, my quarrel is not with the cast or the directors of the show, it's with the people that wrote the budget. I really hope I didn't come off the wrong way, though I fear I did.

Finally, I don't necessarily think that I'd feel quite the way I do if I were an average park guest who had never seen the Tokyo version. It'll work as a fun castle show, though I think it has less of a plot than previous ones (especially CSC). Though, I wasn't too impressed with Tokyo's plot to begin with.
 

cherrynegra

Well-Known Member
wbboy29 said:
OK guys, i have sat by long enough and read all your negative posts. If you don't like the show that's fine, its your opinion, but lets not forget all of those performers who have worked there butt off for that last 6 weeks trying to put and good show together. And now they are on that stage trying to perform and make you all happy. Lets not forget that when yuo are ripping apart this fun show.

I think you misunderstand the comments that the majority have posted about their criticisms about the show. In no way did we disparage the performers but rather the overall show. When comparing the two versions, it is very clear that the Orlando version is a shortened version of the original lacking all of the bells and whistles that make the original show stand out. It is certainly possible to have hard working stellar performers in an underwhelming show. And that's what we were pointing out.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom