"Chicken Little" critical for Disney reputation

speck76

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
"Chicken Little" critical for Disney reputation
Sun Oct 23, 2005 01:19 PM ET
By Gina Keating


LOS ANGELES, Oct 23 (Reuters) - Next month Walt Disney Co. hopes to prove the sky is no longer falling.

The adorably round-headed star of its computer-animated movie, "Chicken Little," will make the case that the storied studio has moved into the next generation of animation and can produce the type of hit films that once were its signature -- and an important profit center.

In the works for five years, "Chicken Little" is the first computer-generated feature film created by Disney animators and follows a string of traditionally animated films that failed to perform as well as many computer-made competitors.

Disney's new effort follows Chicken Little's travails in middle school a year after his disastrously incorrect observation that the sky was falling.

It debuts Nov. 4 in the midst of Disney's talks with Pixar Animation Studios Inc (PIXR.O: Quote, Profile, Research) over whether Disney will continue to distribute and share profits from Pixar's computer-generated, or CG, films and could prove an important factor if a deal is struck, analysts said.

Disney's studio has had a number of golden ages with hand-drawn animated features centering around hits such as the 1937 film, "Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs," and in 1994 "The Lion King." Partner Pixar has had animated hits since 1995.

Ryan Ball, a senior writer for the online Animation magazine said the studio, known for its "Disney Look" and classic story lines, may have to sacrifice both to tap into a more sophisticated audience that now includes young adults.

"Now that everything is going CG, everything is looking the same. That's the trend," Ball said. "(DreamWorks Animation's) 'Shrek' was kind of the first animation movie that went from being a matinee movie for kids to a Friday night date movie."

Analysts said the film must open big and perform well overseas for Disney to be considered a player in the new world of animation, where DreamWorks Animation SKG's (DWA.N: Quote, Profile, Research) "Antz" was not considered a success despite $170 million in worldwide ticket sales.

'A GENUINE DISNEY CARTOON'

"My gut instinct is they need to do something in the $350 million range to be seen as 'Disney's on its way back in animation,'" Rich Greenfield, an analyst at Fulcrum Global Partners, said. "If it does $200 million or $250 million worldwide, it will not be seen as the way to replace Pixar."

Disney dabbled in CG for its 2000 film, "Dinosaur," which featured animated characters on filmed backgrounds, but was slow to adopt the technology that generated blockbusters like "Finding Nemo" for Pixar and "Shrek" for DreamWorks.

Although about 150 animators had to be trained in CG to make "Chicken Little," the studio says it has closed the gap and is on track to release one CG animated film for each of the next three years: "Meet the Robinsons" in 2006, "American Dog" in 2007 and "Rapunzel Unbraided" in 2008.

Like "Chicken Little," the films offer modern takes on classic themes -- similar to the approach DreamWorks and Pixar used to appeal to a new generation of animation fans, including sought-after young males -- and plenty of nods to adult humor.

Time magazine writer Richard Corliss, one of the first critics to review the film, praised it as "a genuine Disney cartoon" and "one of the funniest, most charming and most exhilarating movie in years."

"Chicken Little" director Mark Dindal, who watched the transition from hand-drawn to CG animation at Disney during the making of his film, said studio founder Walt Disney, who championed new technology, would have been proud.

"It was like horses at the starting gate waiting to get their chance," Dindal said of the animators. "We just caught a wave of all this pent up excitement of people saying, 'We'll show you what we can do.'"
 

Connor002

Active Member
If this fails, they're in deep trouble...
This could be more than just "important" for them, it could likely turn out to be vital.
 

speck76

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Connor002 said:
If this fails, they're in deep trouble...
This could be more than just "important" for them, it could likely turn out to be vital.

The good news is that the only competition will be Harry Potter.....and that does not come out until 2 weeks later.

Last year, November had 3 animated releases....The Incredibles, Polar Express, and Spongebob, plus Shark Tale a month earlier....

This fall has been slow for animated films, so the demand could be up, as competition is down.
 

CTXRover

Well-Known Member
^^Beyond the demand for animated films, there's probably a lot of pent-up demand for just a good family movie. There hasn't been a good movie for parents and kids in a long while. Wallace and Gromit is one, but hasn't had mass appeal. That could be good for CL's prospects as well.

I think it looks really good and should do well. For Disney's sake, I hope it does.
 

KevinPage

Well-Known Member
I'm geniuly impressed by all th trailiers I've seen. My only concern is all the pop culture references. I don't mind a few, but I detested Shrek for it's blatant overuse of them. But Shrek never took any flack for it, seems like people use that AGAINST Disney though. You can never please people I guess.

I really think every analyst and fanboy is over stressing the importance of this movie. Disney isn't going bankrupt if the movie doesn't make $300 million. Yeah of course they want it to do well, but if this was a hand drawn movie like the past ones, no one would blinking an eyelash. Disney Management may overreact like most companies like to do these days, but the success/failure of this movie shouldn't mean too much.

Typical media and internet nootnick overreaction to everything these days.
 

catinthehat

New Member
It's true-- it's sad that Disney appears to have so much riding on this and everyone seems to be hyping that-- rather than the film itself. However, I am rather confident becasue I think the film has tons of potential. Like you said, all I've seen so far has been hysterical (including thatrap video I pasted above)-- if this is any reflection of the movie itself, I think people will be pleased and then be able to respect Disney (although it is unfortunate that this is the only thing they are using to judge DIsney). Regardless, I have faith and I, personally, can't wait!
 

luvorlando

New Member
catinthehat said:
Like you said, all I've seen so far has been hysterical (including thatrap video I pasted above)-- if this is any reflection of the movie itself, I think people will be pleased

The movie is filled with stuff like in the rap trailer. I laughed out loud a lot! Disney did an excellent job with this film.

:sohappy:
 

catinthehat

New Member
luvorlando said:
The movie is filled with stuff like in the rap trailer. I laughed out loud a lot! Disney did an excellent job with this film.

:sohappy:

Really?? I just thought those would be little marketing thingys-- great to know the film encompasses that great humor. Laughing out loud never hurt anybody! One more day (yes, I am counting...)
 

Pat X

New Member
I am kinda annoyed with the reviews, these same reviewers that praised films like Shrek for its contemporary gags knock CL.

Lets face it, Disney is in a no-win situation here. Unless the film opens to 70 million, which it won't (I will gladly eat my words if it does), all the pundits and commentators will talk about how this film is not as good as Pixar, Dreamworks and Disney is a failure.

Additionally, Shark Tale and Madagascar were rated horribly as well, and they still earned a lot of money. Sometimes, people aren't looking for Shakespeare, they just want to laugh.
 

catinthehat

New Member
Pat X said:
Lets face it, Disney is in a no-win situation here. Unless the film opens to 70 million, which it won't (I will gladly eat my words if it does), all the pundits and commentators will talk about how this film is not as good as Pixar, Dreamworks and Disney is a failure.

Well I am not as super sure as your are about it not opening that huge-- but I definitely agree with you on the issue of how people will be harsh if not. Disney has so much riding on this so critics will have a tough time just judging it as the good film that it will be-- they will want to pick out the few flaws that they believe Pixar's involvement could have fixed. Well I'll tell you what I think. I am confident it will be good regardless so they can critique all they want. I'll be seeing it and spreading the best word of mouth I can. Good luck Disney!
 

Pat X

New Member
catinthehat said:
Well I am not as super sure as your are about it not opening that huge-- but I definitely agree with you on the issue of how people will be harsh if not.

Hey man,

I am with ya, I WANT it to open huge. But I do think there are reviewers that have something against Disney for whatever reason...check out the review in the Atlanta Journal Constitution....the reviewer said that the story has been "Disneyfied." Whatever...

I guess we need to remember what Walt said, and I paraphrase, "I don't make films for the critics, I make them for the public."

I hope the public eats this up!

:wave:
 

Snapper Bean

Active Member
Unfortunately, Disney has invited criticism because they failed to stay the industry leader in animation production. When Little Mermaid, Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin and Lion King were released, I'm pretty sure that no critic said "it would have been better if produced at Paramount or Fox...." Right now Disney is a follower, not a leader and they appear to be "following" with substandard scripts (in general, I have not seen Chicken Little).
 

Connor002

Active Member
Pat X said:
Hey man,

I am with ya, I WANT it to open huge. But I do think there are reviewers that have something against Disney for whatever reason...check out the review in the Atlanta Journal Constitution....the reviewer said that the story has been "Disneyfied." Whatever...

I guess we need to remember what Walt said, and I paraphrase, "I don't make films for the critics, I make them for the public."

I hope the public eats this up!

:wave:

Critics love to make movies look bad. Their opinions are no better than ours[in most cases].
 

CTXRover

Well-Known Member
The reviews aren't going to help pack the theaters, but I don't know how badly they will affect opening weekend sales. Madagascar and Shark Tale got pretty bad reviews (54% and 35% at rottentomatoes, respectively) but still went on to have 40+ million dollar openings and grosses of 193.2 and 160.8 domestically. Chicken Little now stands at 37% at rottentomatoes on my last check with new reviews added that haven't been counted in the total yet on the site.

The one problem I have with the reviews is that many of them are not critiquing the film as a stand alone film, but rather as its not good enough to put Disney back on top and so its worthless, despite most reviews, even the bad, commenting on the fact that it is funny.

I'll see it this weekend. All the previews I've seen have made me interested in it. I'm hoping for a good weekend for Chicken Little, but most box office sites that predict weekend grosses are expecting Chicken Little to only make 35.7-37.0 million dollars this weekend. That's a good opening, but it won't be good enough to make a solid indication to the industry that Disney animation is back and if it makes less than 40 million, I fear it will be seen as a failure. Too bad....I just hope it doesn't get spirits down at Disney animation too much if it underperforms...I've always thought American Dog and A Day with Wilbur Robinson looked more interesting than Chicken Little anyways.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom