71jason
Well-Known Member
Yes it has stopped.
Read that another balloon from the same manufacturer at Philly Zoo has shut down as well.
Yes it has stopped.
Yeah it seems like every other location with an Aerophile balloon is being shut down. Makes me think they already know the "issue" that caused it and determined it to be a production defect or something. I'm terrified of heights (unless I'm strapped in) so I've never done this and now I'm kind of glad I didn't. This is another one of those examples where sometimes buying an "off the shelf" ride can bite you in the rear end.Read that another balloon from the same manufacturer at Philly Zoo has shut down as well.
All the articles I'm reading almost imply that they may not reopen ever. I'm sure insurance would cover damage (either to the ride or bodily injury) but I doubt it covers the loss of income from not running the attraction. It could... I'm sure Disney would have the best insurance possible... but who knows!If they are shutting down all of their sites during this investigation how will the survive, would insurance cover something like this?
All the articles I'm reading almost imply that they may not reopen ever. I'm sure insurance would cover damage (either to the ride or bodily injury) but I doubt it covers the loss of income from not running the attraction. It could... I'm sure Disney would have the best insurance possible... but who knows!
It wasn't a Disney decision. Aerophile is a separate company and it was their decision, forced really by circumstances. Given the accident any company would have done this.I'm glad Disney put safety before profit. But I hope it reopens before my trip in August, as I was hoping to experience it for the first time!
Disney doesn't operate it, at this point no loss of income. Aerophile has to continue to pay if they wish to return the balloon after inspection. If Aerophile goes bankrupt because of this then bankruptcy claims will handle any remaining obligations in the contract at which point Disney would just look for a new tenant for the site.Disney probably has an insurance policy that covers loss of income for things like that. You would be amazed at what you can get insurance for.
While Aerophile is who made and operates it, I would think there has to be some benefit to Disney having it on their property (i.e. income from it). I'd bet that a certain percentage of each admission fee goes right to Disney.Disney doesn't operate it, at this point no loss of income. Aerophile has to continue to pay if they wish to return the balloon after inspection. If Aerophile goes bankrupt because of this then bankruptcy claims will handle any remaining obligations in the contract at which point Disney would just look for a new tenant for the site.
Just because it's at Disney doesn't mean it is Disney.
Think of Disney as a mall owner. Mall owners lease retail space. Percentage admissions is a poor business model for the mall owner since the mall owner's income would vary with the sales of the tenants. With space leasing the mall owner's income is constant and known. The mall owner only worries about operating the mall, getting new tenants etc. It's up to the tenants to keep up sales to meet the lease terms. The lease payments are how Disney makes money.While Aerophile is who made and operates it, I would think there has to be some benefit to Disney having it on their property (i.e. income from it). I'd bet that a certain percentage of each admission fee goes right to Disney.
Disney doesn't operate it, at this point no loss of income. Aerophile has to continue to pay if they wish to return the balloon after inspection. If Aerophile goes bankrupt because of this then bankruptcy claims will handle any remaining obligations in the contract at which point Disney would just look for a new tenant for the site.
Just because it's at Disney doesn't mean it is Disney.
I believe it's inflated but grounded.Is it closed? cause I still see it inflated at the webcam: http://www.orlando-webcams.com/
or is it an old pic?
All the articles I'm reading almost imply that they may not reopen ever. I'm sure insurance would cover damage (either to the ride or bodily injury) but I doubt it covers the loss of income from not running the attraction. It could... I'm sure Disney would have the best insurance possible... but who knows!
I never tried it because of the price, to be honest. I couldn't personally fathom how a six minute ride would be worth almost $20. But again, that's just my opinion. I didn't feel that the balloon was a bad attraction or "add" to Downtown Disney - I just personally agreed with the statement about not liking to be able to see it from different areas of the resort.
Is it closed? cause I still see it inflated at the webcam: http://www.orlando-webcams.com/
or is it an old pic?
All I am saying is that Disney may have an insurance policy out to cover loss of income for this. Its called business interruption insurance.
I'm sure they have some sort of 'loss of income' insurance. How long it lasts, who knows?
Is it closed? cause I still see it inflated at the webcam: http://www.orlando-webcams.com/ or is it an old pic?
It's a static publicity picture. The live cam was turned off ashortly after the accident.That website must be all fake. It's dark in Orlando tonight at 9:50pm and those pictures still show daylight. And the balloon isn't even there.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.