News Chapek FIRED, Iger New CEO

mightynine

Well-Known Member

So Disney had this response to an investor saying you should spin off ESPN and merge Hulu and D+, and honestly, here's why you should be afraid of this BOD and why they 💕 our bearded leader:

As to the board, the statement described the body as an “independent and experienced” group with “significant expertise in branded, consumer-facing and technology businesses as well as talent-driven enterprises.” It has also “benefited from continuous refreshment with an average tenure of four years,” the statement added.
Nothing makes me think magic more than "branded, consumer-facing and technology businesses" and "talent-driven enterprises*!"

*Wait, I thought the Enterprise was part of Paramount+? ;)
 

Slpy3270

Well-Known Member

So Disney had this response to an investor saying you should spin off ESPN and merge Hulu and D+, and honestly, here's why you should be afraid of this BOD and why they 💕 our bearded leader:


Nothing makes me think magic more than "branded, consumer-facing and technology businesses" and "talent-driven enterprises*!"

*Wait, I thought the Enterprise was part of Paramount+? ;)
In other words "thanks but no thanks". Honestly for once, kudos to the board for telling Loeb to eat . Dude likely thinks Netflix will be back to $400-$500 a share even though there's zero chance that will happen.
 

mightynine

Well-Known Member
In other words "thanks but no thanks". Honestly for once, kudos to the board for telling Loeb to eat ****. Dude likely thinks Netflix will be back to $400-$500 a share even though there's zero chance that will happen.
I agree that spinning off ESPN seems highly unlikely, as Chappie is probably hoping to make a big-time sportsbook deal to help pay for those sweet, sweet rights fees.

As for Hulu merging with D+, that's a when, rather than if, IMO. They simply don't need two services long-term.
 

Slpy3270

Well-Known Member
As for Hulu merging with D+, that's a when, rather than if, IMO. They simply don't need two services long-term.
Loeb's logic appears to be "get rid of ESPN, a reliable profit generator, and use the proceeds to buy full ownership of an asset that makes zero profit and likely never will".

It's as if he hasn't been paying attention to media stocks going all-in on streaming the last 8 months. Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery stock aren't worth crap while Comcast has been significantly downplaying Peacock lately.
 

PuertoRekinSam

Well-Known Member
Nothing makes me think magic more than "talent-driven enterprises*!":

Now I am not a fan of Bob C., but he’s using some Walt terminology there:

“And as I'd sit there while they rode the merry-go-round, did all these things, sit on a bench, you know, eating peanuts, I felt that there should be something built, some kind of an amusement enterprise built where that the parents and the children could have fun together.”
 

mightynine

Well-Known Member
I can't read EVERY thread, you anthropomorphized water-fowl!
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Mind if I check your hands for scissors and a human hair?

These? They're just for arts and craftskets.

1660593500106.png
 

DCBaker

Premium Member
Interview Chapek had with Variety co-editor in chief Cynthia Littleton today -

"You’ve said that we haven’t really seen Disney+ firing on all cylinders yet. With all the content unveiled the past two days at D23 Expo, is the volume planned for 2023 about where you want to be?

When we launched in 2019, we had no idea of the appetite of the Disney+ audience for new content. We underestimated what it was to become the new steady state. I think that realization came over the first year, and it came at a time where we were completely constrained about providing new content, because everything had shut down because of COVID. So the only thing we could do with the little that we had at the time was to repurpose content that was originally thought of for theaters and move it to Disney+, and after all, theaters were closed. But then we came to the realization that in order for us to have our full expression of Disney to our fans, and satiate all the demand that they have, we had to create for both distribution channels, we had to create for theaters, and we had to create for Disney plus. And that means we needed more content than ever. … Now this is the realization of that. Now these are not just title slides at an investor conference, but it’s the embodiment of it. Shows have been written, cast and produced, and they’re starting to come out. And this is the true realization of that.

What have you learned over the past three years of operating Disney+ in terms of the connection between new content and new subscribers signing on. Can you draw a line between a show’s launch and new subscribers joining in week 1, week 2, week 3? How do you calculate your ROI on individual titles in a subscription environment?

We do it in a way that is very thoughtful and very considered. That is the mission of the new distribution (Disney Media and Entertainment Distribution) organization. When we announced (DMED) people were thinking, what is that? It is distribution for the new modern entertainment world where you have to plan not only what comes into the system in terms of new types of storytelling, and how much of it, but also where it goes, when it goes, how it goes. And that is essentially what the mission of that new distribution organization is.

What are your key metrics for valuing Disney+ content and your ROI on individual titles?

We have more metrics, with Disney+, and our streaming businesses to gauge how people are consuming and when people are consuming than ever before. That provides a feedback loop for how much content we need. And remember, we’re only into this less than three years. We’re not even three years into the streaming business. But our sophistication has grown exponentially in terms of knowing how to program this business. You know, we’ve been in the broadcast business forever. We’ve been in the theatrical business forever, that we completely understand. With streaming, we were just getting our sea legs on in the first few years. Now with COVID sort of in the rearview mirror, we’re getting to full expression. Now we’re able to plan what is our full expression of theatrical and how much do we want? How much do we need? What is our full expression for broadcast? How much do we want? How much do we need? And what is our full expression? For our streaming services? How much do we want? How much do we need? And then if you’re a genius like (Marvel Studios chief) Kevin Feige, how do you tie the content that goes into each of those together with a mythology? There is an inextricable link not only the mythology, but the distribution platforms so that the timing of (release) is absolutely critical. It all has to be puzzle pieces that fit together. And that is the mission of that distribution organization.

Disney is facing calls from some prominent investors to shake things up even more. Investor Dan Loeb of Third Point has called for you to sell or spinoff ESPN and devote even more resources to streaming content. He’s not the only one to opine that sports is becoming an outlier for Disney given the unprecedented scope of entertainment content that you now produce. What do you say to those strategic suggestions?

The Disney of the next 100 years will be more expansive than the Disney of the first 100 years. The brand’s elasticity is amazing – the capital D Disney. Each of the components of our company — whether it’s Marvel, Lucasfilm, Pixar, ESPN, ABC — they have their own identity. But they all play into a much more expansive view of what Disney is. And the ultimate arbiter of what Disney can and can’t be is the fan, the viewer, the guest. They are the ultimate arbiter. Now, you can look at this from two different ways, from the guest standpoint or from a commercial standpoint or a shareholder standpoint. Does it actually make sense? And I think that in Dan’s case he was more asking the question, is this the right business combination for the company. Our investors only know what we’ve shared with them to date. They don’t really know what our plans are for the future. We’ve got very ambitious plans for sports. Something like 95 of the top 100 (most-viewed) shows in the past year on broadcast TV have been live sports. So, if you’re in an advertising business, if you’re in a business of talking to people, that’s kind of a big deal.

You feel confident that advertising and affiliate fees are still going to keep ESPN healthy even as sports rights continue to skyrocket?

The advertising demand for ESPN speaks volumes. But what else speaks volumes is that when the word was out on the street that will maybe Disney will spin off ESPN. We had no less than 100 inquiries of people that wanted to buy it. What does that tell you? That says we’ve got something really good. And if you have a strategic plan, a vision for where it fits into the company over the next 100 years, then you don’t exactly want to divest yourself of it. And we have that plan. We’ve not shared that plan.

Do you have a timetable for sharing that plan?

We have not yet divulged that….We we will, at some point, do another investor day. And we’ll have a more fulsome expression of not only that, but a more fulsome expression of our membership ambitions.

Can you give me a practical example of how ESPN and ESPN+ being together with Disney and Disney+ — how do all those entities benefit by being under the same roof?

Today’s expression of that value is through a bundle. And as you know, the bundle offers tremendous value and benefits to the consumer. But it also offers tremendous value and benefits to our shareholders because the churn is so extraordinarily low. You know the term soft bundle and hard bundle, right? Soft bundle is, hey, buy all three services for the low price of X. The hard bundle is when things become seamless, and without friction. Right now if you want to go from Hulu to ESPN+ to Disney+, you have to go in and other of one app to another app. In the future, we may have less friction (grins).

You also have a lot going on right now with Hulu. The service is coming off an incredible year with original content, but the larger question remains of how does Hulu fit into the emerging Disney bundle?

Well, the number one request that we have from Disney plus subscribers, is more general entertainment. We still have a lot of headroom to go from Marvel fans that have yet to subscribe. Lucas fans a lot of headroom to go, Pixar lot of headroom to go. But the number-one opportunity we have is to add more general entertainment. When people watched ‘Dumbo’ with their kids, and they put them to bed, and it’s now 7:30, those same very same people might not want to watch ‘Bambi,’ right? They want to watch something else, something that’s still capital D Disney. And the elasticity of that is much more broad than we ever could have imagined, as exhibited through our experience in Europe, on Disney+, where we have a lot more general entertainment on the (platform). The appetite for general entertainment is enormous. We have lots of general entertainment content within the Walt Disney Co. We just don’t have the full ability to use it because of the complicated ownership situation that we have (in Hulu), at least for the next 16 months.

To that end there’s an agreement in place for you to buy out Comcast’s remaining 33% share in Hulu by 2024. Are there any conversations going on now to accelerate that buyout timetable?

Chapek: It is possible. But that depends on the propensity for the other partner to be willing to have discussions that would bring that to fruition earlier. We would be absolutely willing to do it.

Are you in active negotiations now?

We’ve been in discussions for quite a long time. This is not a new idea. There have been ongoing, sporadic conversations for a long time.

I have many more questions but our time is tight. Let’s end on the parks division which is close to your heart as the division leader prior to your promotion to CEO in February 2020. We’ve heard a lot of agita from consumers about changes to the annual passholder program for Disney Parks. That obviously not what you want to hear. What’s your solution?

We like to make sure that we’re meeting the needs of all of our guests, and we absolutely love our superfans. The balancing factor is you also want to cater to the family from Topeka, Kansas that shows up with their family of four. And they want to be able to get into the park and experience the magic of Disney once every five years. We’ve got to make sure that we’ve got space in the park to deliver on their needs as well. So it’s a balancing act. And as demand for our parks exceeds our ability to, in a quality way, deliver on that experience because the demand is so much higher than our supply, we need to provide balancing factors over time to make sure that we not only meet the needs of the superfan, but meet the needs of the fans that can only come once every five years from a distant location."

 

JoeCamel

Well-Known Member
"We like to make sure that we’re meeting the needs of all of our guests, and we absolutely love our superfans. The balancing factor is you also want to cater to the family from Topeka, Kansas that shows up with their family of four. And they want to be able to get into the park and experience the magic of Disney once every five years. We’ve got to make sure that we’ve got space in the park to deliver on their needs as well. So it’s a balancing act. And as demand for our parks exceeds our ability to, in a quality way, deliver on that experience because the demand is so much higher than our supply, we need to provide balancing factors over time to make sure that we not only meet the needs of the superfan, but meet the needs of the fans that can only come once every five years from a distant location."


APs don't spend like Joe from Topeka - gee Bob make it a little plainer
 

Doberge

True Bayou Magic
Premium Member
Do you have a timetable for sharing that plan? (Note: sports plan specifically)

We have not yet divulged that….We we will, at some point, do another investor day. And we’ll have a more fulsome expression of not only that, but a more fulsome expression of our membership ambitions.

I have many more questions but our time is tight. Let’s end on the parks division which is close to your heart as the division leader prior to your promotion to CEO in February 2020. We’ve heard a lot of agita from consumers about changes to the annual passholder program for Disney Parks. That obviously not what you want to hear. What’s your solution?

The balancing factor is you also want to cater to the family from Topeka, Kansas that shows up with their family of four. And they want to be able to get into the park and experience the magic of Disney once every five years.... so it’s a balancing act ... the demand is so much higher than our supply, we need to provide balancing factors over time...

These are two parts that stood out. One, the phrase "fulsome expression of our membership ambitions." Yes, the question was sports related but "fulsome" indicates broad and sounds like more than limited to sports.

Then he said balance/balancing three times quickly but not in any way that is encouraging for the "superfans" he professes to loving. Disney's idea of balancing is not putting a finger on the needle but rather choking out people. Disney's idea, as we've seen, is to charge more and while the "intent" is to provide more we've seen it hasn't worked out in that way.
 

Sir_Cliff

Well-Known Member
"We like to make sure that we’re meeting the needs of all of our guests, and we absolutely love our superfans. The balancing factor is you also want to cater to the family from Topeka, Kansas that shows up with their family of four. And they want to be able to get into the park and experience the magic of Disney once every five years. We’ve got to make sure that we’ve got space in the park to deliver on their needs as well. So it’s a balancing act. And as demand for our parks exceeds our ability to, in a quality way, deliver on that experience because the demand is so much higher than our supply, we need to provide balancing factors over time to make sure that we not only meet the needs of the superfan, but meet the needs of the fans that can only come once every five years from a distant location."


APs don't spend like Joe from Topeka - gee Bob make it a little plainer
I gotta be fair and say that I don't think what he's saying here is unreasonable. It is a balancing act between super fans who come all the time and mostly do spend less per visit and those who come less often and may be spending a lot for their vacation. I don't think the business is sustainable in the longterm if the only people having a good time are the existing super fans.

Whether they have come up with the correct solutions is another issue.
 

WondersOfLife

Blink, blink. Breathe, breathe. Day in, day out.
The funny thing about "younger people" is that they eventually become older people.

This ran in the Oakland Tribune in 1905:

View attachment 659524

JacksonClarion-Ledger, 1955:

View attachment 659525

People have been writing about the imminent death of baseball for more than 100 years.
My 74 year old father has been working in schools for seeeveral years... And the teachers have ALWAYS said "back in my day, students were excited to get an education! They weren't lazy! They had longer attention spans!"

And in 2022, they're still saying the same things.

The only thing that changes in a generation is technology, and how we communicate. Otherwise, human beings have always been human beings. And classifying anyone into a specific category is always going to be utterly ridiculous...
 

JoeCamel

Well-Known Member
These are two parts that stood out. One, the phrase "fulsome expression of our membership ambitions." Yes, the question was sports related but "fulsome" indicates broad and sounds like more than limited to sports.

Then he said balance/balancing three times quickly but not in any way that is encouraging for the "superfans" he professes to loving. Disney's idea of balancing is not putting a finger on the needle but rather choking out people. Disney's idea, as we've seen, is to charge more and while the "intent" is to provide more we've seen it hasn't worked out in that way.
Exactly, I don't have a problem with premium pricing for a premium product but what they are turning the parks into is far from premium. I think the problem is that the "superfans" know what they are doing and Joe from Topeka won't notice. Bob underestimates people
 

fgmnt

Well-Known Member
I gotta be fair and say that I don't think what he's saying here is unreasonable. It is a balancing act between super fans who come all the time and mostly do spend less per visit and those who come less often and may be spending a lot for their vacation. I don't think the business is sustainable in the longterm if the only people having a good time are the existing super fans.

Whether they have come up with the correct solutions is another issue.

If the Parks business is not sustainable long-term, it will largely be a prison of Disney's own making. There will always be some strife from externalities outside of their direct control -- the ongoing climate crisis, socioeconomic and political instabilities, energy prices -- things that would also affect other F100 companies.

They have demand for a product that, for decades, consumers have considered it to have extreme value. The parks division, a nearly 70 year old enterprise, had its value built progressively over the first 2/3 of its existence. Since then, it has been Burbank's prerogative to extract that value predecessors built for them instead of continuing to be good stewards of the division.

It takes 2 hours to get from Magic Kingdom to your car because they don't have enough nighttime entertainment staggered at night. No one is having a good time in the cow corral for the boat or Monorail, be they a superfan or Dan and his family from Denver. Charging $6 for a Dole Whip annoys the person decked out in Orange Bird attire as much as it would someone from Ohio. Making it hard for an annual passholder to get on more than 4 or 5 attractions at Hollywood Studios because of a confluence of capacity and downtime does not mean it's becoming easier for Olive Onedayticket.

If it's such an in-demand product, quit screwing around and get shovels in the ground.
 

Indy_UK

Well-Known Member
I gotta be fair and say that I don't think what he's saying here is unreasonable. It is a balancing act between super fans who come all the time and mostly do spend less per visit and those who come less often and may be spending a lot for their vacation. I don't think the business is sustainable in the longterm if the only people having a good time are the existing super fans.

Whether they have come up with the correct solutions is another issue.

Totally agree.

I think once they’ve done all the work in California like the DVC tower, Avengers ride and toon town I think they need to just give those parks a rest for a while.

It’s mainly made up of locals and I expect the revenue from there is fairly steady, so just leave there alone for a period of time and don’t add anything new, divert some of that money then towards WDW
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom