To be fair… none of those are in the USA.
I get what you're saying, but the tech is ... a car driving. You're not supposed to be in awe of the self-driving system; you're supposed to feel like one of the vehicles from Cars is driving you around. This seems a sensible means to achieve that. Whether or not the attraction is successful will have a lot more to do with the setting, potential show scenes, indoor sections, and thrill factor than whether or not people still find self-driving technology impressive in a couple decades.
That’s how I feel in radiator springs racers….
Yes, but that doesn't mean every Cars attraction has to use exactly that system. On top of that, I'm not even arguing about how well this will potentially work relative to RSR. It could very well be a poorer realization of the IP. I'm just saying that the perceived novelty of self-driving technology is not something that the attraction is centering; they're just trying to sell you on the illusion that the vehicles are sentient, which is something the technology can likely achieve no matter how commonplace it becomes.
God I miss that view.Personally I prefer the ones with BTM or Splash in the background.
Yes no doubt. Others have speculated as much too.
The fun in those activities is that you control the vehicle. They’re not much fun if you’re a rider with no input.
They just boxed in the speedway with Tron and dramatically limited what can be done in that spot.
I think they can find something that is a better use of the space but Stitch is right there and it sits plus Space needs work and I hear Buzz is fading (never did it). Lots of possibilities but will they find the money and a champion to set it on a new course
