It is a canonical setting from the Cars universe. None of the films in the series take place in the same location, so they have a lot of options to pick from, whereas the media involving Tiana and Moana have a consistent setting.
I wasn’t banned. Was of my own accord. wanted to come back to my original account, but I lost access. Used to be sneaky. Accs last name was streetway so, there ya go.
I really dislike the "Suggested By" VS setting a Cars attraction in the actual locations from the films we all know... I never saw Planes... have no idea who those characters are or the settings... If they were doing a "Planes" attraction I would not expect it to be located in Radiator Springs... It just feels off-model....and unnecessary...to me anyway...
The series bounces all over the place, even in the mainline films. A big part of both of the sequels is going to races in different locations (internationally in 2 in Japan, Italy, and the UK and within the US in 3 in California, Florida, Georgia, etc.). Even if you are not familiar with Planes: F&R, seeing Lightning on basically any racetrack is consistent with his film portrayal. Your attempt to draw a parallel with putting Tiana outside of New Orleans is not at all comparable.
Again, true. But the reality is the water is going away, and there's nothing to be done about it. There are 455 (and counting) pages in this thread bemoaning the loss of the water, with very little thought as to what could be done to make the best of it. This was an attempt.
And the other reality is that really good [themed] design is incorporated at such a fundamental level of things like building placement and form that you can’t just swap things out and get an equally strong outcome.
Soo u want to rip out roa over a new park got it
One does not necessitate the other. There are three existing underbuilt parks.
Got u a what baffles me is there ripping out one of if not the best parts of mk just to bulid something new and slap an ip on it and call it a day
MK is technically underbuilt too for the number of visitors it gets, and the Cars work is partially being tackled as it is because it is one of the easier ways to access a substantial expansion pad. For that reason, I don’t think it’s as reductive as “slap an IP on it and call it a day” since it’s actually “slap an IP on it and then develop the lands beyond”.
Central design elements aren’t usually considered an “expansion pad.” The east side of Main Street, USA isn’t an expansion pad even though it could make room for a nice sized show building.
I mean, I agree, but they’re intent on making it one. As you have pointed out, even on here, most folks still want to access that same area and reduce the Rivers to a puddle.
I guess? Villains just seem kind of faddish in their current push as misunderstood antiheroes, and a "dark" park feels really off-brand to me for Disney.
There are actual expansion pads available without tearing anything down.
I know, but they obviously want this to be one.
