Tony Perkis
Well-Known Member
Well that's the big mistake period IMO. It's like 'artificial scarcity' - If you set out to do something because your end-game is to force the impact its supposed to have.. it's not organic and it never will be as impactful as something that was.
At face value, I don’t disagree. In most instances, I think that’s a fair assessment.
That said, Hollywood has been lagging behind in regard to gender opportunity, especially behind the camera. Sometimes, an artificial boost is required to jump start things.
Strength of the lead character? "Someone killed my dad/uncle/mom/whatever?" "I was in some horrible accident.. and now I'm different" whatever formulas? The term "bubblegum comic" is not synomous with shallow by chance..
Those are not character traits. Those are plot devices.
Steve Rogers’s going through a scientific experiment to become a super soldier isn’t who Captain America is. His strict moral compass and leadership traits helps define him.
Peter Parker getting bit by a radioactive spider isn’t why people like Spider-Man. People like him because he’s a relatable, quick-witted high school student that struggles through a lot of the same struggles we did.
The super suit isn’t why Iron Man is cool. He’s cool because Tony Stark is a deeply flawed character. He’s funny, snarky, clever, and an incredibly self-absorbed narcissist.
The hammer isn’t why Thor is a fan favorite. His arc from a spoiled brat to a noble leader, and his relationship with a flawed villain like Loki help define him. His loyalty to those both help and spurn him keeps him interesting.
Carol Danvers is.....who? She absorbed a ton of power in an accident. Then what? She didn’t fight between two worlds because she didn’t know one of the worlds. She didn’t have lasting friendships worth grounding her because she didn’t know people from her past. She’s got decent banter with Fury, but that’s just chemistry. I still have no clue who she is as a person because she didn’t have a character arc. She’s being established as the weapon to solve the outcome of the Snappening, and little else.
She then forgets everything and then doesn’t have the same hold back.We see plenty to establish how she was repeatedly told to hold back.. you are less.. and how she fights back against that notion and is driven to be more.
That resonates in her 'career choices' that lead her to Mar-Vell .. and in her resistance to her chains/bounds the kree put on her as they re-condition her.
That’s fair, but fairly simplistic in terms of character. Strong-willed isn’t a particularly unique character identifier.
The whole identity crisis stuff is pretty cliche.. but at least gives the story a twist the viewers have to weigh for a period as they try to decide who really is telling the truth... the kree or the skrulls.
This would have worked better if the script better connected her old self and her current self. The two are the same person technically, but having her old past told to her instead of her having a true emotional connection lessens any impact regarding the identify crisis. There is still a clear disconnect between the two parts of her life, and it fundamentally makes her two distinct characters instead of one complex character.
She is now given an opportunity advance an ideal a higher power exposed her to.. and help right some of the wrongs she sees the kree representing.
[/QUOTE]
Which is why that story works much better when told from the perspective of the Skrull, and not Danvers herself.