This is a philosophical issue, of course, but in my opinion is just another issue that should be handled and decided at home, not by the government. If youre willing to potentially affect your childs education (for better or for worse) then that should be up to you (thr parent). But I fear that lots of parents are not qualified to make such decisions .. Hence why the govt has to step in.
I take more issue with those that don't want the govt (ie school system) involving themselves in their business but then complain about the state of education in this country. Its tough to have both.
For me it is more of an attitude of "don't do things that are going to cost me and then expect me to pay for it."
Seatbelt laws spring to mind. For those that are old enough, remember the outrage when seat belt laws came into existence. People resisted them left and right. One of the arguments was, if I want to risk my life by not wearing a seat belt, then the government cannot make me.
OK, that's fine. But if you get in an accident and need a large amount of medical care, then insurance should not pay for it, because I don't want my premiums to go up because of your actions. If you get in an accident and die, then your family does not get to apply for government assistance (WIC, food stamps, welfare, etc.) because my tax dollars are not going to go pay for a situation you caused by your actions.
I have no problems with helping people who are victims of unfortunate circumstances - in fact I do it quite often - but when somebody flouts the rules established by society, and then things go wrong, and they expect society to bail them out, that’s where I have an issue.
So, if someone wants to take their kid out of school, fine. But, any extra hours that a teacher has to spend helping your kid out because of it, is taking time away from a student that actually went to school. Your kid needs make up work or help - you pay for it. If your kid can’t follow the lesson on the Monday they get back because it builds on what was taught the week they took off to go to WDW, then tough - don't disrupt the rest of the class with questions - go pay for a tutor to get you up to speed.
For kids in band, or on debate teams, or who are out sick, those are activities that have been approved by the BoE and District Administration, and by my vote and voice to those bodies I have given tacit approval to because I think they are in the long run good for the student body in general, and the community in which I live (and pay for public schooling). But to let someone go on vacation with their kid because they don't like heat, or don't want to go when it is busy, or their job only gives them 2 weeks of vacation, nope - I am not going to help pay for that.
There are plenty of times when I would like to do something or go somewhere and I can't because of scheduling reasons. It's called life. I have two choices. I can either be an adult and realize that I can't do everything that I want, or I can (sometimes) pay extra (either in money, time, or something else) to change the situation. What I do not do, is fly against the rules that the society that I live in has established, and then expect that same society to pay for my actions.