If you’re in the position of the investors who would buy bonds from Virgin Trains you would. The utility of the system will determine its long term success. Tampa—Orlando—SoBe by itself lacks the potential of, say, the NEC. If it was fast enough, and it’s not and may never be with costly upgrades, and connected to the rest of the I-95 corridor, it could be a real rival to air travel in many markets like Atlanta, where ATL—MCO is the most flown domestic route (obviously many are connecting flights, but let’s be generous and say a third of the 1.5 million flights are passengers living in the Atlanta metro area, that’s not nothing).
But the core problem with how thIs country pursues HSR, and this isn’t real HSR, is this lack of connectivity. One route won’t determine the success or failure of a rail system; except when you’re looking to scam investors for money
. The interstate highway system isn’t judged on specific intercity routes, it’s about being comprehensive, easy to use and being able to efficiently meet the driver’s needs. This is why the fact that rail connections to Orlando exist doesn’t matter to most people, it’s not a viable solution to their needs. The other Brightline WDW thread links to a trip report on Theme Park Insider of a person who took Amtrak and it wasn’t exactly a pleasant experience.
The barrier to entry for the real extension they should be focusing on, MCO to Atlanta, is that that would require too much work and money because there aren’t established right of ways like Tampa Orlando and prior HSR efforts.
I dislike Virgin Trains because it’s very likely to fail and be a black mark on private sector efforts, or public bond sales, to rebuild passenger rail infrastructure in the US. A major point of frustration in these threads about transportation/urban planning is that these decision matter and they will have consequences 50-100 years from now and we should do our best to think long term about what we give future generations.