dstrawn9889
Well-Known Member
too much bat-flek, not enough BatBale... the new Batman doesnt look gritty enough.
too much bat-flek, not enough BatBale... the new Batman doesnt look gritty enough.
Wow, you baller! You had a VIP screening and didn't invite me? LOL.Well, just got back from a free pre-screening of the movie (one that was not in any way paid for by the studio, so probably a far better indication of public opinion).
Unfortunately - better than Star Wars and Avatar it was not.
The theatre actually boo'd after the credits. Granted it was do to the lack of tag. But yes, boo's. It's not Fantastic Four terrible, it's certainly watchable, but I do question whether Snyder will be allowed to direct Justice League.
LOL. I have to agree with you. After getting burned by BvS, I will now refrain from recommending certain movies before watching them.BvS was just a bad film. Batfleck was good. Only reason WW was good was because everything else was bad.
If they wanted to minimize the impact they could also go to toy story route with the extension. Build the new flume while the old ride operated, and when it was ready shut down Kali for a few months to make the connection. New, better ride with minimal downtime.I don't hate @Siren's idea for the Jungle Book overlay on Kali, but I really dislike that type of thinking in general. If it included a flume extension and the references were subtle (i.e. didn't try to retell the story, you'd just see the representations of the characters in animatronic form) I think I'd be on board.
Awww, thank you so much! Great minds & all that! And OMG, I can't believe the box office for this movie was $103.5 Million. Just wow.I love your Jungle Book idea for Kali. The ride is bad because the slow part has become completely boring and of course the good part is too short. If you make the first half interesting (your idea is a great fit for that) you have a much better ride, probably a must do.
I look forward to seeing the movie.
The Jungle Book replacing Kali would be a substantial upgrade and enhancement to an otherwise underwhelming ride experience.I don't hate @Siren's idea for the Jungle Book overlay on Kali, but I really dislike that type of thinking in general. If it included a flume extension and the references were subtle (i.e. didn't try to retell the story, you'd just see the representations of the characters in animatronic form) I think I'd be on board.
Currently, Civil War is tracking at $175 Million for it's opening weekend and growing! So we'll see.Civil War is coming and it's going to be a BEAST!!!!!!
Ugh. Star Wars is on fire right now, so if Cameron is concerned about competing with this franchise maybe he should just wait until 2020 or 2023 until things calm down. It's clear now that he is walking on eggshells and tap dancing around Disney. I think it's wise.The director also revealed his release plans for the new sequels, specifically tailored to avoid competition with a certain other major franchise. "My original plan was to release them a year apart, but we’re opening that up," he stated. "If for no other reason than that I don’t want to land on the same date as one of the Star Wars sequels."
"That wouldn’t be fair to them. [Laughs] No, that’s just good business. I don’t want to go head-to-head with Star Wars. That would be stupid. And hopefully they won’t want to go head-to-head with us."
how is that different from pushing the TFA movie into the 70mm digital imax and 3d formats?Avatar had a perfect storm of having people see the film multiple times and specifically seeing it in expensive/premium formats because the big selling point was the experience of seeing the film in theaters. This also had the impact on drawing people in to see who who might have otherwise "waited for the DVD".
It would be hard for any movie to replicate that because the uniqueness of why people were seeing Avatar in theaters. It was almost more akin to people riding POTC over and over to enjoy the details and participate in the "experience" than to a typical film.
Might be lower if the hype of TFA lowers.Can someone breakdown results based on 2009 dollar vs today's dollar in the world wide market. Currency deflation.
What would TFA do globally in 2009 before the increase in the American dollar?
The short of it...The US dollar has grown in strength, foreign currency less mighty in exchange rates.
Some have said it would be a 30% to 40% difference. That would put TFA around 2.5 billion worldwide. Still wouldnt catch Avatar but blows past Titanic.
TFA did amazing numbers in America, United Kingdom. As expected, it didn't gain traction in China. 125 million isn't terrible but furious 7 made 390 million in China.
Still, amazing global numbers for a 7th installment in a franchise.
Will be interesting to see how Rouge one does.
I'm expecting 700 to 1.2 billion globally.
Your thoughts?
how is that different from pushing the TFA movie into the 70mm digital imax and 3d formats?
Well, technically Avatar was about its amazing visuals and 3d.I'm not sure what you are saying. Avatar more than any movie I've ever seen had this word of mouth of "you need to see this in the theaters in 3D". The hype was all about the visuals and the need to appreciate them fully in theaters for the experience. People would see it repeatedly in the theaters because it was an experience you could not replicate in one's home.
The Force Awakens was nothing like that. Sure, there was the typical so and so scene looks awesome in 3D that you see with most every action movie, but the vast majority of hype was about the story and the characters.
That's not a dragon, that's Clifford the Big Red Dog after taking a swim in a swamp. Terrible redesign.Now on to Pete's Dragon -- this is the first concept.
After I expressed my disappointment and concerns about the first dragon -- Disney totally took my advice and headed right back to the drawing board and have now created this gorgeous masterpiece of a dragon. He is unlike any dragon I have ever seen.
Like, I don't even like dragons but I totally want to hug of this one. He is just so darn cute and adorable.
Disney, I *totally* approve. Like, I already love him
how so? Jungle book is themed to India. Kali is an indu godness.I think that The Jungle Book is one of the few ips that actually could go in the park, but if you retheme Kali with The Jungle Book, you are stripping Asia's identity, and really the entire park. I really hope that that won't happen.
It could go in the East side of Asia, but where it is is a place of realism. You feel immersed in Asia, and the story works with Everest, but The Jungle Book would make no sense there. Again in the other side of Asia it could work where there is currently nothing, but not there.how so? Jungle book is themed to India. Kali is an indu godness.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.