You're not wrong.You were doing so well until the last part.
A CEO is ethically and legally obligated to act in the best interest of the shareholders. That's his only job.
The argument against Iger, if you're going to make one, isn't "he only cares about the shareholders." It's "the things he's doing aren't in the best interest of the shareholders long-term."
I just find it disgusting how much people gushed when it was announced that he was coming back and replacing Chapek.
No CEO should ever be put up on a pedestal like that. They're evil.