I get that your upset about watever, but posting pics from inside a 15 billion dollar airport and saying why can't they build this in epcot is just bonkers.
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
News Big changes coming to EPCOT's Future World?
- Thread starter djkidkaz
- Start date
Sir_Cliff
Well-Known Member
Yes, how strange the design of a performance space and exhibition centre at a Disney theme park doesn't rival the scale of an airport built by an oil rich autocratic Gulf State.
Last edited:
they actually played the completed version of that track during the spaceship earth points of light show
Epcot81Fan
Well-Known Member
Apparently poor Disney can’t scrape enough pennies together to even keep up with the current architecture in public spaces.
It’s a long way down from the same company who once inspired the world with Spaceship Earth.
#lowexpectations
It’s a long way down from the same company who once inspired the world with Spaceship Earth.
#lowexpectations
aladdin2007
Well-Known Member
incredible how backwards we have gone since then
Epcot81Fan
Well-Known Member
While the rest of the world is doing this in free public spaces:
WDI is putting this in the center of their premier theme park:
“Absolutely amazing” indeed….
would you stop posting pictures of multibillion dollar airports and complaniing they arent getting built in epcot...You arent making any sense and its just getting weird. Your coming across unhinged
DreamfinderGuy
Well-Known Member
Obviously nobody is expecting multi-billion dollar structures at EPCOT, but the point of EPCOT failing to build anything architecturally interesting in the modern day is valid. EPCOT's architectural legacy in the 2020s so far is making one building from the 80s look significantly worse, a couple significantly better, some rectangles, and rebuilding an uglier version of a building they just tore down.
The two remotely unique buildings (Festival Center and new Earth Station) they had planned both got canceled. With all the money being spent they can and should do better than they are.
Bocabear
Well-Known Member
I agree... The comparisons to beautiful forward thinking architecture are valid... Scale might be off, but this particular park should have had a lot more in terms of beautiful architecture....and we basically got a corporate office campus park and a white cement building. The triangles are nice...thank God for them because they are the only things of interest...
The lack of a fountain or water feature in the large central garden is baffling, and the central promotion planter is borderline obscene....
The lack of a fountain or water feature in the large central garden is baffling, and the central promotion planter is borderline obscene....
Centauri Space Station
Well-Known Member
Yeah this was way better
Sir_Cliff
Well-Known Member
If no-one is expecting that kind of architecture, then the comparison really isn't valid. The airports of wealthy North American and Western European countries don't compare to those of small, rich, autocratic states like Qatar and Singapore, so why compare them to the central spine of Epcot?
It is certainly a valid argument that the architecture of these recent refurbishments is not interesting, is bad, etc. These comparisons suggest two related things to me, though. One is that no-one has any realistic idea what Epcot in the 2020s is supposed to look like. The other is that people have blown out of all proportion how innovative and futuristic the original EPCOT Center was when it first opened. So, people start scouting around for projects that aren't realistic comparisons like the Jewel at Singapore Airport that cost over $1 billion as a reasonable analogy for how 2020s Epcot should look and complain that spaces that are actually more in line with the scale and scope of the original EPCOT Center like Connections and Creations aren't like stepping through portals into a world no-one had previously been able to imagine. Again, you can critique the latter on their own merits, but critiquing them because they don't look like the airport terminal of an oil rich Gulf State is silly.
Last edited:
Disgruntled Walt
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
To me, it's less about who built the futuristic looking airport and more about the fact that Disney could have built something that looks cool, like those airports. Instead, we got what we got. I'm not asking for them to spend $1 billion, but if they're going to tear up the central spine of the park for YEARS, the end result should have been better than it is.
Bocabear
Well-Known Member
NO ONE is saying that it looked better with the 1990s shade nets...no one...
but I will say that the original configuration of this area was WAY better than what they did in the 90s.
more water...more greenery, less concrete.... The two central buildings looked better too.
Andrew25
Well-Known Member
Everyone has their own opinion, but the "hub" of Epcot has never really looked good until now (including opening day). Sure, it would have been better with their original plans... but it looks nice. Doesn't justify how long it took, but I'm happy to just move along and hope Figment gets worked on soon.
DreamfinderGuy
Well-Known Member
The sad part is no it wouldn't have lol, we got the better plan of the two
mattpeto
Well-Known Member
That's the thing though. I respect the passion, but the old days aren't coming back.
You don't have to love everything, but if you hate everything - it just might be you.
Mikomike12
Well-Known Member
Well, They tried I guess
