Odyssey is the new experience center.I'm sure In the Oddesy building
More like 4.7
Here's a better idea...
After today I can’t tell if this statement is even more funny or even more depressingI am assuming that they were discussing what can be torn down in future world to make room for more food and wine kiosks.
We're way past Epcot 2.0
These changes are clearly an upgrade. WDW is closing Innoventions, a large space with a poorly defined purpose, little coherent theming, and large amounts of open space punctuated by outdated kiosks. But to make up for that, they are going to repurpose Odyssey and WoL and build a new festival center, so we will have THREE NEW large spaces with a poorly defined purpose, little coherent theming, and large amounts of open space punctuated by outdated kiosks.
Oh, and the old festival center by the UK still exists, so maybe four?
EPCOT - come for the cavernous, decaying, pointless interiors, stay because you’re too drunk to find the exit
It makes me sad they can't use Marvel in the parks as I feel like having a true Stark Expo would be the only way management would be even remotely interested in keeping EPCOT's roots intact. I know many might just moan at the sound of Marvel, but we all know Disney only uses relevant IP's now so this would be the best case scenario for EPCOT. Ant-Man could easily host a ride similar to Adventure Thru Inner Space & they could fit in a Black Panther pavilion showcasing the technology they use in Wakanda as well. It would bring attendance in while keeping EPCOT's purpose. Much better plan than whatever they are doing with Guardians, which I'll enjoy but it really has nothing to do with EPCOT. To be honest, the rumored remodel doesn't look anything different that what they are doing to our local tired malls out in California. Add some pretty lounge areas, some alcohol, add a movie theater, make it pretty & call it a day. I'm sure it will look nice but not very inspiring like EPCOT is supposed to be
View attachment 385071
View attachment 385072
View attachment 385073
View attachment 385075
View attachment 385074
It makes me sad they can't use Marvel in the parks as I feel like having a true Stark Expo would be the only way management would be even remotely interested in keeping EPCOT's roots intact. I know many might just moan at the sound of Marvel, but we all know Disney only uses relevant IP's now so this would be the best case scenario for EPCOT. Ant-Man could easily host a ride similar to Adventure Thru Inner Space & they could fit in a Black Panther pavilion showcasing the technology they use in Wakanda as well. It would bring attendance in while keeping EPCOT's purpose. Much better plan than whatever they are doing with Guardians, which I'll enjoy but it really has nothing to do with EPCOT. To be honest, the rumored remodel doesn't look anything different that what they are doing to our local tired malls out in California. Add some pretty lounge areas, some alcohol, add a movie theater, make it pretty & call it a day. I'm sure it will look nice but not very inspiring like EPCOT is supposed to be
View attachment 385071
View attachment 385072
View attachment 385073
View attachment 385075
View attachment 385074
Small, simple dark rides in the buildings would be neat. Something along the lines of the Google Assistant "ride".The original Communicore and early Innoventions were essentially Stark Expos. The problem is what to put in there, since Disney is definitely not a tech company, and the real ones don’t seem interested in showcasing bleeding-edge tech to the general public.
Internet forums often claim that future tech changes too frequently to place in a theme park, and that people can see it at Best Buy anyway. But that doesn't stop annual trade shows from updating their latest, greatest products each year—many of which are astounding and never go into production, making them true small-scale attractions in their own right.
Those could’ve been the B and C tickets Epcot needs to round out its park. Instead, Disney is hiding the lack of activities by chopping up the large buildings into smaller ones.
You’re not getting anything new, folks. WDI is just making the gaps less noticeable.
The original Communicore was more a supplement to the attractions. You'd visit Universe of Energy to get an overview of the past, present and possible future of Energy. Then in CommunCore you could get more in-depth and hands-on information about Energy (and, of course, Exxon). There was the Future Choice Theater (instant polling), Backstage Magic showing computers, etc. The current Inventions were more stand-alone industry exhibits like you'd find at a tech convention.The original Communicore and early Innoventions were essentially Stark Expos. The problem is what to put in there, since Disney is definitely not a tech company, and the real ones don’t seem interested in showcasing bleeding-edge tech to the general public.
Internet forums often claim that future tech changes too frequently to place in a theme park, and that people can see it at Best Buy anyway. But that doesn't stop annual trade shows from updating their latest, greatest products each year—many of which are astounding and never go into production, making them true small-scale attractions in their own right.
Those could’ve been the B and C tickets Epcot needs to round out its park. Instead, Disney is hiding the lack of activities by chopping up the large buildings into smaller ones.
You’re not getting anything new, folks. WDI is just making the gaps less noticeable.
Yes, I know. And they showcased quite a bit of cutting-edge tech in the 80s and 90s.The original Communicore was more a supplement to the attractions. You'd visit Universe of Energy to get an overview of the past, present and possible future of Energy. Then in CommunCore you could get more in-depth and hands-on information about Energy (and, of course, Exxon). There was the Future Choice Theater (instant polling), Backstage Magic showing computers, etc. The current Inventions were more stand-alone industry exhibits like you'd find at a tech convention.
Exactly.Technology has made the original business model for Epcot obsolete. Disney could promise companies millions of annual visitors (with good disposable income) to which they could showcase their products and services by sponsoring a pavilion in Future World. Now those same companies can reach the same audiences via the Internet at a lower cost than investing millions annually with Disney.
The original Communicore and early Innoventions were essentially Stark Expos. The problem is what to put in there, since Disney is definitely not a tech company, and the real ones don’t seem interested in showcasing bleeding-edge tech to the general public.
Internet forums often claim that future tech changes too frequently to place in a theme park, and that people can see it at Best Buy anyway. But that doesn't stop annual trade shows from updating their latest, greatest products each year—many of which are astounding and never go into production, making them true small-scale attractions in their own right.
Those could’ve been the B and C tickets Epcot needs to round out its park. Instead, Disney is hiding the lack of activities by chopping up the large buildings into smaller ones.
You’re not getting anything new, folks. WDI is just making the gaps less noticeable.
Technology has made the original business model for Epcot obsolete. Disney could promise companies millions of annual visitors (with good disposable income) to which they could showcase their products and services by sponsoring a pavilion in Future World. Now those same companies can reach the same audiences via the Internet at a lower cost than investing millions annually with Disney.
I would hate to see Epcot lose its promise of showcasing new technology. Perhaps in the same way that they host "food and spirits" festivals for a couple of months at a time, they could host the theme-park equivalent of cutting edge trade shows. I'd be just as happy to schedule my visit during one of those times.
I was 38 when I first visited Epcot (72 now). I loved it. And there was the promise of updates to keep up with technology, which never happened quickly enough--in my opinion. Now they are in desperate need of a revamp in the Future World section. I'm not opposed to the use of Disney's IP in newly imagined pavilions, but The Seas is a perfect example of how NOT to use IP. If I want to see Finding Nemo, I can stream the movie. But I'd be happy to have Nemo and his friends help me better understand the ecosystem in which they live. That could capture the imagination of children and the kid inside of all of us by doing so.
I've never understood why Disney, one of the leaders in creativity, can't create a Journey Into Imagination that blows us all away. That's one instance where the original ride was better than its successors, but it could still be SO MUCH MORE!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.