RSoxNo1
Well-Known Member
I understand that moving "it's a small world" to Epcot is unlikely to increase attendance at Epcot. What it will do is allow them to further expand Fantasyland and add an attraction to Epcot that actually fits. For those of us that feel that Epcot should have limited use of movie based IPs in their attractions, there are other ways to help that park. It's why I've also suggested that if they have to rebuild Space Mountain from the ground up, why not put that in Epcot as well as part of a larger Space Pavilion?Moving IASW to EPCOT will not dramatically increase attendance at EPCOT. I doubt IMO that Disney will spend any resources moving it, never mind thinking about moving it? Any investment has to be able to have a return via additional guest counts, reduced operating costs, or other $-related efficiencies.
What people fail to realize is that many classic attractions have name/brand recognition that's as good as some movies. If Disney would allow themselves to think further than next quarters balance sheet they would realize that what separated them from everyone else is that all of the pieces in a park fit together. When they don't fit together they need to undertake a massive overhaul to fix it.
The time to make a pie in the sky move like relocating "it's a small world" is when there are other moving pieces involved. By itself, moving "it's a small world" doesn't fix Epcot, but as a piece in a larger puzzle it helps put the park in a better direction.
As for the overall $ related efficiencies/inefficiencies. Those would be generated by the additions to Fantasyland that would be easier to accomplish by removing "it's a small world".