Tony the Tigger
Well-Known Member
I don't mind the circle avatars. Nothing is permanent. Nice change for awhile.
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
New Feature Beyond "Like" - reactions
- Thread starter wdwmagic
- Start date
MinnieM123
Premium Member
I like the circles, too. 
Maybe in the future, there may be a way for people who like the squares, to have the option of a square or circle.
Maybe in the future, there may be a way for people who like the squares, to have the option of a square or circle.
Kram Sacul
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- Yes
Circle avatars and hard to distinguish wire-frame icons. The bad UI design store must've had a sale. I do like the different emoticons though. Lots of love heading your way.
PizzaPlanet
Well-Known Member
I love using the different reactions! Can we get a "confused" one? I feel like that would get plenty of use.
SirWillow
Well-Known Member
Now that I've had some time to play with them, liking the additions and the changes. shape of the avatar doesn't phase me one way or the other much, but I can see why people would have a preference. To bad there isn't a way to make an option for either square or circle.
also really like the "points" "reaction score" and other ways of seeing who is making worthy contributions.
also really like the "points" "reaction score" and other ways of seeing who is making worthy contributions.
No Name
Well-Known Member
I really don't think the angry reaction should add to a person's reaction score at all. There are some posts which deserve such a reaction but not if the poster gets something positive from it.
My other confusion always comes from whether to use the angry face only when I dislike the opinion expressed in a post or also when I dislike the factual content of the post. For example, if someone posts "I think Disney should build a Zootopia ride in DAK," they deserve a solid angry face. But let's say that becomes factual and someone shares the news, "Disney is building a Zootopia ride in DAK," I don't like it but it's nothing against the poster, so do I use that face? I didn't know what to do on Facebook and then I stopped using it. I would hate to stop using wdwmagic.com. Please help.
My other confusion always comes from whether to use the angry face only when I dislike the opinion expressed in a post or also when I dislike the factual content of the post. For example, if someone posts "I think Disney should build a Zootopia ride in DAK," they deserve a solid angry face. But let's say that becomes factual and someone shares the news, "Disney is building a Zootopia ride in DAK," I don't like it but it's nothing against the poster, so do I use that face? I didn't know what to do on Facebook and then I stopped using it. I would hate to stop using wdwmagic.com. Please help.
Every type of reaction is one reaction point. So, in order to up my reaction count, Ima gonna try to make everyone as angry as I can!!!
It's working!!!
EvilChameleon
Well-Known Member
Is it possible to add "informative" to the selection?